Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(145)

Side by Side Diff: content/test/data/media/image_capture_test.html

Issue 2190523004: ImageCapture: content_browsertest WebRtcImageCaptureBrowserTest CreateAndGetCapabilities (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Rebase Created 4 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « content/content_tests.gypi ('k') | content/test/webrtc_content_browsertest_base.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
(Empty)
1 <!DOCTYPE html>
2 <html>
3 <head>
4 <!-- Image Capture Browser Test -->
5 </head>
6 <body>
7 <video id='video' autoplay></video>
8 <script type="text/javascript" src="webrtc_test_utilities.js"></script>
9 <script>
10
11 // Runs an ImageCapture.getPhotoCapabilities().
12 function testCreateAndGetCapabilities() {
13 var hasVideoInputDevice = false;
14 navigator.mediaDevices.enumerateDevices()
15 .then(devices => {
16 devices.forEach(function(device) {
17 if (device.kind === "videoinput")
18 hasVideoInputDevice = true;
19 });
20
21 if (!hasVideoInputDevice)
22 return Promise.reject("no video devices");
23 })
24 .catch(err => {
25 return failTest('Error enumerating devices: ' + err.toString());
26 });
27
28
29 navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia({"video" : true})
30 .then(stream => {
31 document.getElementById('video').src = URL.createObjectURL(stream);
32 assertEquals('video', stream.getVideoTracks()[0].kind);
33
34 return new ImageCapture(stream.getVideoTracks()[0]);
35 })
36 .then(capturer => {
37 // getUserMedia() returns relatively fast, allowing for ImageCapture to
38 // be constructed, but the underlying VideoCaptureDevice is still under
39 // construction in its own thread. Need to wait yikes!
phoglund_chromium 2016/07/28 14:07:49 This _will_ be flaky. I recommend you write this
mcasas 2016/07/29 00:00:50 Actually, I've have a deeper thought: a user would
40 setTimeout(function() {
41 capturer.getPhotoCapabilities()
42 .then(capabilities => {
43 assertNotEquals(0, capabilities.imageHeight.min);
44 assertNotEquals(0, capabilities.imageHeight.current);
45 assertNotEquals(0, capabilities.imageHeight.max);
46 assertNotEquals(0, capabilities.imageWidth.min);
47 assertNotEquals(0, capabilities.imageWidth.current);
48 assertNotEquals(0, capabilities.imageWidth.max);
49 assertNotEquals(0, capabilities.zoom.min);
50 assertNotEquals(0, capabilities.zoom.current);
51 assertNotEquals(0, capabilities.zoom.max);
52 reportTestSuccess();
53 })
54 .catch(err => {
55 return failTest(err.toString());
56 });
57 }, 500);
58 })
59 .catch(err => {
60 return failTest(err.toString());
61 });
62 }
63
64 </script>
65 </body>
66 </html>
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « content/content_tests.gypi ('k') | content/test/webrtc_content_browsertest_base.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698