Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(830)

Issue 2188403002: Revert "fix #26141, add support for type arguments to constants" (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 4 months ago by Jennifer Messerly
Modified:
4 years, 4 months ago
Reviewers:
Paul Berry
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org
Base URL:
git@github.com:dart-lang/sdk.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/heads/master
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Revert "fix #26141, add support for type arguments to constants" This reverts commit 5d155000af4285db51976d0722989081e27a415f. Seems to have lost an error regarding type literals used in non-strong mode. Probably an easy fix, but reverting for simplicity. Committed: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/commit/bd6669ee114bd9cc2eb0d8efd00e15eb329455b4

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+47 lines, -192 lines) Patch
M pkg/analyzer/lib/src/dart/ast/utilities.dart View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
M pkg/analyzer/lib/src/dart/constant/evaluation.dart View 13 chunks +27 lines, -112 lines 0 comments Download
M pkg/analyzer/lib/src/dart/constant/value.dart View 4 chunks +15 lines, -12 lines 0 comments Download
M pkg/analyzer/lib/src/generated/error_verifier.dart View 3 chunks +4 lines, -6 lines 0 comments Download
M pkg/analyzer/test/src/dart/constant/evaluation_test.dart View 2 chunks +0 lines, -9 lines 0 comments Download
M pkg/analyzer/test/src/task/strong/checker_test.dart View 1 chunk +0 lines, -52 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5 (2 generated)
Jennifer Messerly
Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as bd6669ee114bd9cc2eb0d8efd00e15eb329455b4 (presubmit successful).
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-07-28 23:52:11 UTC) #2
Jennifer Messerly
FYI to you Paul, I should have a follow up shortly. All checks in ErrorVerifier ...
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-07-28 23:54:21 UTC) #4
Jennifer Messerly
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-07-28 23:55:38 UTC) #5
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2016/07/28 23:54:21, John Messerly wrote:
> FYI to you Paul, I should have a follow up shortly. All checks in
ErrorVerifier
> were guarded with !strongMode, so I'm guessing that perhaps it's because we
> implement visitTypeName now.

Oh, and this was caught by the bots. I had run Analyzer's package tests but not
the full suite of lang tests. Usually strong mode changes can't affect them, but
this one appears to have done so unintentionally.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698