Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(21)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/chromeos/login/enrollment/enterprise_enrollment_helper_impl.cc

Issue 2186623002: Minimal attestation-based enrollment flow. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Made ZTE independent of enterprise enrollment. Created 4 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/chromeos/login/enrollment/enterprise_enrollment_helper_impl.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/chromeos/login/enrollment/enterprise_enrollment_helper_impl.cc b/chrome/browser/chromeos/login/enrollment/enterprise_enrollment_helper_impl.cc
index baec231eacd00abba756fe05d085c03b2f312396..bfd4aaed820580eb65dac33d603ee12e6ccb5677 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/chromeos/login/enrollment/enterprise_enrollment_helper_impl.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/chromeos/login/enrollment/enterprise_enrollment_helper_impl.cc
@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl(
: EnterpriseEnrollmentHelper(status_consumer),
enrollment_config_(enrollment_config),
enrolling_user_domain_(enrolling_user_domain),
- started_(false),
- finished_(false),
+ started_oauth_(false),
+ finished_oauth_(false),
success_(false),
auth_data_cleared_(false),
weak_ptr_factory_(this) {
@@ -84,15 +84,15 @@ EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl(
}
EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::~EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl() {
- DCHECK(g_browser_process->IsShuttingDown() || !started_ ||
- (finished_ && (success_ || auth_data_cleared_)));
+ DCHECK(g_browser_process->IsShuttingDown() || !started_oauth_ ||
+ (finished_oauth_ && (success_ || auth_data_cleared_)));
}
void EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::EnrollUsingAuthCode(
const std::string& auth_code,
bool fetch_additional_token) {
- DCHECK(!started_);
- started_ = true;
+ DCHECK(!started_oauth_);
+ started_oauth_ = true;
oauth_fetcher_.reset(policy::PolicyOAuth2TokenFetcher::CreateInstance());
oauth_fetcher_->StartWithAuthCode(
auth_code, g_browser_process->system_request_context(),
@@ -103,28 +103,38 @@ void EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::EnrollUsingAuthCode(
void EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::EnrollUsingToken(
const std::string& token) {
- DCHECK(!started_);
- started_ = true;
- DoEnrollUsingToken(token);
+ DCHECK(!started_oauth_);
+ started_oauth_ = true;
+ DoEnroll(token);
+}
+
+void EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::EnrollUsingAttestation() {
+ DCHECK(enrollment_config_.mode ==
pastarmovj 2016/08/19 10:29:18 I wonder if this should not even be a CHECK. Could
The one and only Dr. Crash 2016/08/19 17:49:29 Sounds reasonable.
+ policy::EnrollmentConfig::MODE_ATTESTATION ||
+ enrollment_config_.mode ==
+ policy::EnrollmentConfig::MODE_ATTESTATION_FORCED);
+ DoEnroll("");
}
void EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::ClearAuth(const base::Closure& callback) {
- // Do not revoke the additional token if enrollment has finished
- // successfully.
- if (!success_ && additional_token_.length())
- (new TokenRevoker())->Start(additional_token_);
-
- if (oauth_fetcher_) {
- if (!oauth_fetcher_->OAuth2AccessToken().empty())
- (new TokenRevoker())->Start(oauth_fetcher_->OAuth2AccessToken());
-
- if (!oauth_fetcher_->OAuth2RefreshToken().empty())
- (new TokenRevoker())->Start(oauth_fetcher_->OAuth2RefreshToken());
-
- oauth_fetcher_.reset();
- } else if (oauth_token_.length()) {
- // EnrollUsingToken was called.
- (new TokenRevoker())->Start(oauth_token_);
+ if (started_oauth_) {
+ // Do not revoke the additional token if enrollment has finished
+ // successfully.
+ if (!success_ && additional_token_.length())
+ (new TokenRevoker())->Start(additional_token_);
+
+ if (oauth_fetcher_) {
+ if (!oauth_fetcher_->OAuth2AccessToken().empty())
+ (new TokenRevoker())->Start(oauth_fetcher_->OAuth2AccessToken());
+
+ if (!oauth_fetcher_->OAuth2RefreshToken().empty())
+ (new TokenRevoker())->Start(oauth_fetcher_->OAuth2RefreshToken());
+
+ oauth_fetcher_.reset();
+ } else if (oauth_token_.length()) {
+ // EnrollUsingToken was called.
+ (new TokenRevoker())->Start(oauth_token_);
+ }
}
chromeos::ProfileHelper::Get()->ClearSigninProfile(
@@ -132,8 +142,7 @@ void EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::ClearAuth(const base::Closure& callback) {
weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr(), callback));
}
-void EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::DoEnrollUsingToken(
- const std::string& token) {
+void EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::DoEnroll(const std::string& token) {
DCHECK(token == oauth_token_ || oauth_token_.empty());
oauth_token_ = token;
policy::BrowserPolicyConnectorChromeOS* connector =
@@ -143,7 +152,7 @@ void EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::DoEnrollUsingToken(
LOG(ERROR) << "Trying to re-enroll to a different domain than "
<< connector->GetEnterpriseDomain();
UMA(policy::kMetricEnrollmentPrecheckDomainMismatch);
- finished_ = true;
+ finished_oauth_ = true;
status_consumer()->OnOtherError(OTHER_ERROR_DOMAIN_MISMATCH);
return;
}
@@ -200,13 +209,13 @@ void EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::OnTokenFetched(
const GoogleServiceAuthError& error) {
if (error.state() != GoogleServiceAuthError::NONE) {
ReportAuthStatus(error);
- finished_ = true;
+ finished_oauth_ = true;
status_consumer()->OnAuthError(error);
return;
}
if (!is_additional_token) {
- DoEnrollUsingToken(token);
+ EnrollUsingToken(token);
return;
}
@@ -225,7 +234,9 @@ void EnterpriseEnrollmentHelperImpl::OnEnrollmentFinished(
// TODO(pbond): remove this LOG once http://crbug.com/586961 is fixed.
LOG(WARNING) << "Enrollment finished";
ReportEnrollmentStatus(status);
- finished_ = true;
+ if (started_oauth_) {
+ finished_oauth_ = true;
+ }
if (status.status() == policy::EnrollmentStatus::STATUS_SUCCESS) {
success_ = true;
StartupUtils::MarkOobeCompleted();

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698