Fix VM implementation of CastError not to extend TypeError (issue 5280).

tests/language/generic_test.dart

Index: tests/language/generic_test.dart
===================================================================
--- tests/language/generic_test.dart	(revision 25753)
+++ tests/language/generic_test.dart	(working copy)
@@ -54,16 +54,12 @@
     Expect.equals(true, c.b_.isT(const AX()));
     try {
       E e = new E();  // Throws a type error, if type checks are enabled.
-    } on TypeError catch (error) {
+    } on TypeError catch (error, stacktrace) {

[siva, 2013/08/05 17:57:52]

I have noticed that you have introduced the stacktrace variable to validate the
stacktrace. The error objects already have a stack trace in them it is not
necessary to add a stacktrace object to the catch
block.

For instance:
Expect.isTrue(error.stackTrace().contains(...));
should also work.

What you have is also fine, I am not asking you to change the code, just an
observation.

[regis, 2013/08/05 18:34:44]

Done.

       result = 1;
-      int pos = error.url.lastIndexOf("/", error.url.length);
-      if (pos == -1) {
-        pos = error.url.lastIndexOf("\\", error.url.length);
-      }
-      String subs = error.url.substring(pos + 1, error.url.length);
-      Expect.equals("generic_test.dart", subs);
-      Expect.equals(31, error.line);  // new B<T>(t); AX does not extend A.
-      Expect.equals(21, error.column);
+      // Location of malformed error: T extends A, but AX does not extend A.
+      Expect.isTrue(error.toString().contains("line 20 pos 9"));
+      // Location of failed type check: new B<T>(t)/
+      Expect.isTrue(stacktrace.toString().contains("generic_test.dart:31:21"));
     }
     return result;
   }