Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(81)

Unified Diff: base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc

Issue 2177373005: Revert "Allow SequencedTaskRunnerHandle::Get() while running unsequenced tasks." (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: merge up to r408965 Created 4 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
diff --git a/base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc b/base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
index 55f1249cf28adc85b6d5a4e02c348d73b619bb8d..18270a6f4f913bea794be5c70d4c710f8b291212 100644
--- a/base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
+++ b/base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
@@ -14,11 +14,9 @@
#include "base/macros.h"
#include "base/memory/ref_counted.h"
#include "base/message_loop/message_loop.h"
-#include "base/sequence_checker_impl.h"
#include "base/stl_util.h"
#include "base/synchronization/condition_variable.h"
#include "base/synchronization/lock.h"
-#include "base/synchronization/waitable_event.h"
#include "base/test/sequenced_task_runner_test_template.h"
#include "base/test/sequenced_worker_pool_owner.h"
#include "base/test/task_runner_test_template.h"
@@ -897,140 +895,47 @@ TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, FlushForTesting) {
pool()->FlushForTesting();
}
-// Helper method for VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunner() and
-// VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunnerForUnsequencedTask().
-void VerifySequencedTaskRunnerRunsOnCurrentThread(
- SequencedTaskRunner* task_runner,
- bool should_run_on_current_thread,
- const Closure& callback) {
- EXPECT_EQ(should_run_on_current_thread,
- task_runner->RunsTasksOnCurrentThread());
- callback.Run();
-}
-
-void VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunner(
- SequencedTaskRunner* expected_task_runner,
- bool expected_equal,
- const Closure& callback) {
- scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> task_runner =
- SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequencedTaskRunnerForCurrentThread();
-
- EXPECT_TRUE(task_runner->RunsTasksOnCurrentThread());
-
- // SequencedTaskRunner does not allow directly checking for equality, but we
- // can post a task to one task runner and verify that the other task runner
- // is on the same sequence.
- task_runner->PostTask(
- FROM_HERE,
- Bind(&VerifySequencedTaskRunnerRunsOnCurrentThread,
- base::Unretained(expected_task_runner), expected_equal, callback));
-}
-
-void VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunnerForUnsequencedTask(
- SequencedWorkerPool* pool,
- const Closure& callback) {
- EXPECT_FALSE(
- SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequenceTokenForCurrentThread().IsValid());
-
- scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> task_runner =
- SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequencedTaskRunnerForCurrentThread();
-
- EXPECT_TRUE(task_runner->RunsTasksOnCurrentThread());
-
- scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> expected_task_runner =
- SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequencedTaskRunnerForCurrentThread();
+namespace {
- // The pool should now be running a sequence. This also verifies that no other
- // thread will start running tasks with this sequence token.
- const SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken sequence_token =
+void CheckWorkerPoolAndSequenceToken(
+ const scoped_refptr<SequencedWorkerPool>& expected_pool,
+ SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken expected_token) {
+ SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken token =
SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequenceTokenForCurrentThread();
- ASSERT_TRUE(sequence_token.IsValid());
- EXPECT_TRUE(pool->IsRunningSequence(sequence_token));
-
- // The two sequenced task runners should be the same. See
- // VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunner() above for why the check is implemented
- // this way.
- const bool expected_equal = true;
- task_runner->PostTask(FROM_HERE,
- Bind(&VerifySequencedTaskRunnerRunsOnCurrentThread,
- RetainedRef(std::move(expected_task_runner)),
- expected_equal, callback));
-}
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_token.ToString(), token.ToString());
-TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, GetSequencedTaskRunnerForCurrentThread) {
- EnsureAllWorkersCreated();
-
- // The current thread should not have a sequenced task runner from a
- // worker pool.
- scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> local_task_runner =
- SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequencedTaskRunnerForCurrentThread();
- EXPECT_FALSE(local_task_runner);
-
- WaitableEvent event(WaitableEvent::ResetPolicy::AUTOMATIC,
- WaitableEvent::InitialState::NOT_SIGNALED);
- Closure signal = Bind(&WaitableEvent::Signal, Unretained(&event));
- scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> task_runner_1 =
- pool()->GetSequencedTaskRunner(SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequenceToken());
- scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> task_runner_2 =
- pool()->GetSequencedTaskRunner(SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequenceToken());
- task_runner_1->PostTask(
- FROM_HERE, Bind(&VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunner,
- base::Unretained(task_runner_1.get()), true, signal));
- event.Wait();
- task_runner_2->PostTask(
- FROM_HERE, Bind(&VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunner,
- base::Unretained(task_runner_2.get()), true, signal));
- event.Wait();
-
- task_runner_1->PostTask(
- FROM_HERE, Bind(&VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunner,
- base::Unretained(task_runner_2.get()), false, signal));
- event.Wait();
-
- pool()->PostWorkerTask(
- FROM_HERE, Bind(&VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunnerForUnsequencedTask,
- RetainedRef(pool()), signal));
- event.Wait();
+ scoped_refptr<SequencedWorkerPool> pool =
+ SequencedWorkerPool::GetWorkerPoolForCurrentThread();
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_pool, pool);
}
-class ChecksSequenceOnDestruction
- : public RefCountedThreadSafe<ChecksSequenceOnDestruction> {
- public:
- void DoNothing() {}
-
- private:
- friend class RefCountedThreadSafe<ChecksSequenceOnDestruction>;
-
- ~ChecksSequenceOnDestruction() {
- EXPECT_TRUE(sequence_checker_.CalledOnValidSequence());
- }
-
- SequenceCheckerImpl sequence_checker_;
-};
+} // namespace
-void VerifySequenceOnDestruction(const Closure& callback) {
- scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> task_runner =
- SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequencedTaskRunnerForCurrentThread();
- scoped_refptr<ChecksSequenceOnDestruction> check_sequence(
- new ChecksSequenceOnDestruction);
+TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, GetWorkerPoolAndSequenceTokenForCurrentThread) {
+ EnsureAllWorkersCreated();
- // Post a task to an empty method. This will keep the only reference to the
- // object, so it will be destroyed right after running the task.
- task_runner->PostTask(FROM_HERE, Bind(&ChecksSequenceOnDestruction::DoNothing,
- std::move(check_sequence)));
+ // The current thread should have neither a worker pool nor a sequence token.
+ SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken local_token =
+ SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequenceTokenForCurrentThread();
+ scoped_refptr<SequencedWorkerPool> local_pool =
+ SequencedWorkerPool::GetWorkerPoolForCurrentThread();
+ EXPECT_FALSE(local_token.IsValid()) << local_token.ToString();
+ EXPECT_FALSE(local_pool);
- // Post the callback afterwards, so we can be sure the first task completed.
- task_runner->PostTask(FROM_HERE, callback);
-}
+ SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken token1 = pool()->GetSequenceToken();
+ SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken token2 = pool()->GetSequenceToken();
+ pool()->PostSequencedWorkerTask(
+ token1, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&CheckWorkerPoolAndSequenceToken, pool(), token1));
+ pool()->PostSequencedWorkerTask(
+ token2, FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&CheckWorkerPoolAndSequenceToken, pool(), token2));
-TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, CheckSequenceOnDestruction) {
- EnsureAllWorkersCreated();
+ pool()->PostWorkerTask(FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&CheckWorkerPoolAndSequenceToken, pool(),
+ SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken()));
- WaitableEvent event(WaitableEvent::ResetPolicy::AUTOMATIC,
- WaitableEvent::InitialState::NOT_SIGNALED);
- Closure signal = Bind(&WaitableEvent::Signal, Unretained(&event));
- pool()->PostWorkerTask(FROM_HERE, Bind(&VerifySequenceOnDestruction, signal));
- event.Wait();
+ pool()->FlushForTesting();
}
TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, ShutsDownCleanWithContinueOnShutdown) {
« no previous file with comments | « base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698