Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(232)

Issue 2175273002: [ic] Don't call LookupIterator::GetStoreTarget() when receiver is not a JSReceiver. (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 5 months ago by Igor Sheludko
Modified:
4 years, 5 months ago
CC:
v8-reviews_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
v8
Visibility:
Public.

Description

[ic] Don't call LookupIterator::GetStoreTarget() when receiver is not a JSReceiver. BUG=chromium:619166, chromium:625155 Committed: https://crrev.com/5c8cb1689a543955cd1a47d3c323f8710b8b0f15 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38018}

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 2 : Addressing comments #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+28 lines, -4 lines) Patch
M src/lookup.h View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/objects.cc View 1 2 chunks +8 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download
M test/cctest/test-api-interceptors.cc View 1 chunk +19 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 16 (8 generated)
Igor Sheludko
PTAL
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-07-25 11:49:45 UTC) #4
jochen (gone - plz use gerrit)
lgtm https://codereview.chromium.org/2175273002/diff/1/src/lookup.h File src/lookup.h (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2175273002/diff/1/src/lookup.h#newcode179 src/lookup.h:179: DCHECK(receiver_->IsJSObject()); why not ISJSReceiver?
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-07-25 11:53:36 UTC) #5
jochen (gone - plz use gerrit)
alternatively, we could convert to a JSReceiver which we'll do for the interceptor anyways
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-07-25 11:57:10 UTC) #6
Igor Sheludko
https://codereview.chromium.org/2175273002/diff/1/src/lookup.h File src/lookup.h (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2175273002/diff/1/src/lookup.h#newcode179 src/lookup.h:179: DCHECK(receiver_->IsJSObject()); On 2016/07/25 11:53:36, jochen wrote: > why not ...
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-07-25 11:57:39 UTC) #7
Igor Sheludko
On 2016/07/25 11:57:10, jochen wrote: > alternatively, we could convert to a JSReceiver which we'll ...
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-07-25 11:58:44 UTC) #10
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.org/2175273002/20001
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-07-25 12:06:26 UTC) #13
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #2 (id:20001)
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-07-25 12:30:50 UTC) #14
commit-bot: I haz the power
4 years, 5 months ago (2016-07-25 12:33:05 UTC) #16
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/5c8cb1689a543955cd1a47d3c323f8710b8b0f15
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38018}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698