Ignore failure on more GTX660 GMs

expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu12-ShuttleA-GTX660-x86-Release/expected-results.json

Index: expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu12-ShuttleA-GTX660-x86-Release/expected-results.json
diff --git a/expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu12-ShuttleA-GTX660-x86-Release/expected-results.json b/expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu12-ShuttleA-GTX660-x86-Release/expected-results.json
index 5cadbcab5bcce7f37fb650ed21992ae41c1caade..b6bcdaea5d0618601d26ce3ab3460c7482c7e5f1 100644
--- a/expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu12-ShuttleA-GTX660-x86-Release/expected-results.json
+++ b/expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu12-ShuttleA-GTX660-x86-Release/expected-results.json
@@ -13537,10 +13537,10 @@
           10769322296615755298
         ]
       ], 
-      "ignore-failure": true,
       "bugs": [
         2354
       ], 
+      "ignore-failure": true, 
       "reviewed-by-human": false
     }, 
     "megalooper_0x0_nvprmsaa4.png": {
@@ -13551,8 +13551,9 @@
         ]
       ], 
       "bugs": [
-        2325
+        2354
       ], 
+      "ignore-failure": true, 
       "reviewed-by-human": false
     }, 
     "megalooper_0x0_pdf-poppler.png": {
@@ -13610,10 +13611,10 @@
           10769322296615755298
         ]
       ], 
-      "ignore-failure": true,
       "bugs": [
         2354
       ], 
+      "ignore-failure": true, 
       "reviewed-by-human": false
     }, 
     "megalooper_1x4_nvprmsaa4.png": {
@@ -13624,8 +13625,9 @@
         ]
       ], 
       "bugs": [
-        2325
+        2354
       ], 
+      "ignore-failure": true, 
       "reviewed-by-human": false
     }, 
     "megalooper_1x4_pdf-poppler.png": {
@@ -13683,10 +13685,10 @@
           10769322296615755298
         ]
       ], 
-      "ignore-failure": true,
       "bugs": [
         2354
       ], 
+      "ignore-failure": true, 
       "reviewed-by-human": false
     }, 
     "megalooper_4x1_nvprmsaa4.png": {
@@ -13696,10 +13698,10 @@
           10769322296615755298
         ]
       ], 
-      "ignore-failure": true,
       "bugs": [
         2354
       ], 
+      "ignore-failure": true, 
       "reviewed-by-human": false
     }, 
     "megalooper_4x1_pdf-poppler.png": {
@@ -13751,10 +13753,10 @@
           7068817626419515805
         ]
       ], 
-      "ignore-failure": true,
       "bugs": [
         2354
       ], 
+      "ignore-failure": true, 
       "reviewed-by-human": false
     }, 
     "mixed_xfermodes_nvprmsaa4.png": {
@@ -15192,10 +15194,10 @@
           12915657818379420968
         ]
       ], 
-      "ignore-failure": true,
       "bugs": [
         2354
       ], 
+      "ignore-failure": true, 
       "reviewed-by-human": false
     }, 
     "poly2poly_nvprmsaa4.png": {
@@ -19649,6 +19651,7 @@
       "bugs": [
         2325

[epoger, 2014/03/31 15:37:03]

Should this one be bug 2354?  Or does it matter?

[borenet, 2014/03/31 16:19:38]

Yes, it should, thanks.  It's "we need baselines" vs "these are flaky".

       ], 
+      "ignore-failure": true, 
       "reviewed-by-human": false
     }, 
     "verttext_nvprmsaa4.png": {