Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(135)

Unified Diff: src/compiler/simplified-lowering.cc

Issue 2154073002: [Turbofan]: Eliminate the check for -0 if it's not possible/observable. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git@master
Patch Set: Fixes. Created 4 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: src/compiler/simplified-lowering.cc
diff --git a/src/compiler/simplified-lowering.cc b/src/compiler/simplified-lowering.cc
index 0cc53ed9b48072796dcc8a44757edd3412ca4660..6fbd3130e6718a615394b1e47742af51b599f400 100644
--- a/src/compiler/simplified-lowering.cc
+++ b/src/compiler/simplified-lowering.cc
@@ -1077,6 +1077,10 @@ class RepresentationSelector {
return jsgraph_->simplified();
}
+ void ChangeToInt32MulWithOverflowOp(Node* node, CheckForMinusZeroMode kMode) {
+ NodeProperties::ChangeOp(node, simplified()->CheckedInt32Mul(kMode));
+ }
+
void ChangeToInt32OverflowOp(Node* node) {
NodeProperties::ChangeOp(node, Int32OverflowOp(node));
}
@@ -1334,6 +1338,22 @@ class RepresentationSelector {
// Try to use type feedback.
BinaryOperationHints::Hint hint = BinaryOperationHintOf(node->op());
+ // Determine if one of the inputs is a constant integer > 0.
+ Type* input0_type = NodeProperties::GetType(node->InputAt(0));
+ Type* input1_type = NodeProperties::GetType(node->InputAt(1));
Jarin 2016/07/17 18:24:41 You can use TypeOf here (instead of NodeProperties
mvstanton 2016/07/18 08:48:58 Done.
+ bool positive_range = false;
+ if ((input0_type->IsRange() && input0_type->AsRange()->Min() > 0) ||
+ (input1_type->IsRange() && input1_type->AsRange()->Min() > 0)) {
Jarin 2016/07/17 16:37:47 Maybe it is better to not refer to ranges here and
Benedikt Meurer 2016/07/17 17:44:07 Yes, please. And I'd prefer to have this inline be
mvstanton 2016/07/18 08:48:58 No problemo
mvstanton 2016/07/18 08:48:58 Done.
+ positive_range = true;
+ }
+
+ // If one of the inputs is positive and/or truncation is being applied,
+ // there is no need to return -0.
+ CheckForMinusZeroMode mz_mode =
+ (truncation.TruncatesToWord32() || positive_range)
+ ? CheckForMinusZeroMode::kDontCheckForMinusZero
+ : CheckForMinusZeroMode::kCheckForMinusZero;
Jarin 2016/07/17 18:24:41 Looking at this again, this logic is only used whe
mvstanton 2016/07/18 08:48:58 Good idea, done!
+
// Handle the case when no int32 checks on inputs are necessary
// (but an overflow check is needed on the output).
if (BothInputsAre(node, Type::Signed32())) {
@@ -1342,7 +1362,7 @@ class RepresentationSelector {
hint == BinaryOperationHints::kSigned32) {
VisitBinop(node, UseInfo::TruncatingWord32(),
MachineRepresentation::kWord32, Type::Signed32());
- if (lower()) ChangeToInt32OverflowOp(node);
+ if (lower()) ChangeToInt32MulWithOverflowOp(node, mz_mode);
return;
}
}
@@ -1351,7 +1371,7 @@ class RepresentationSelector {
hint == BinaryOperationHints::kSigned32) {
VisitBinop(node, UseInfo::CheckedSigned32AsWord32(),
MachineRepresentation::kWord32, Type::Signed32());
- if (lower()) ChangeToInt32OverflowOp(node);
+ if (lower()) ChangeToInt32MulWithOverflowOp(node, mz_mode);
return;
}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698