Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(309)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_visibility_observer.cc

Issue 2142983002: Add desktop engagement metrics. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: fix unittests Created 4 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_visibility_observer.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_visibility_observer.cc b/chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_visibility_observer.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3c072e542daec408915570d5f0d860ae252b11a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_visibility_observer.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_visibility_observer.h"
+
+#include "base/memory/singleton.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/metrics/desktop_engagement_service.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/ui/browser.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/ui/browser_list.h"
+
+namespace metrics {
+
+namespace {
+
+const int kVisibilityGapTolerance = 5; // seconds, can make it a finch param.
Patrick Monette 2016/07/13 16:06:24 constexpr base::TimeDelta kVisibilityGapTolerance
gayane -on leave until 09-2017 2016/07/20 20:22:02 Logic changed a bit. Please have a look/
+
+} // namespace
+
+ChromeVisibilityObserver::ChromeVisibilityObserver()
+ : weak_factory_(this) {}
+
+ChromeVisibilityObserver::~ChromeVisibilityObserver() {
+ BrowserList::RemoveObserver(this);
+}
+
+void ChromeVisibilityObserver::SendVisibilityChangeEvent(bool active) {
+ DesktopEngagementService::Get()->OnVisibilityChanged(active);
+}
+
+void ChromeVisibilityObserver::CancelVisibilityChange() {
+ weak_factory_.InvalidateWeakPtrs();
+}
+
+// static
+ChromeVisibilityObserver* ChromeVisibilityObserver::GetInstance() {
chrisha 2016/07/14 13:58:48 Does this need to be a singleton? Maybe this can s
gayane -on leave until 09-2017 2016/07/20 20:22:02 Agreed. It made more sense before. I have removed
+ return base::Singleton<ChromeVisibilityObserver>::get();
+}
+
+// static
+void ChromeVisibilityObserver::Initialize() {
+ BrowserList::AddObserver(GetInstance());
+}
+
+void ChromeVisibilityObserver::OnBrowserSetLastActive(Browser* browser) {
+ if (weak_factory_.HasWeakPtrs())
+ CancelVisibilityChange();
+ else
+ SendVisibilityChangeEvent(true);
+}
+
+void ChromeVisibilityObserver::OnBrowserNoLongerActive(Browser* browser) {
+ base::MessageLoop::current()->PostDelayedTask(
+ FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(&ChromeVisibilityObserver::SendVisibilityChangeEvent,
+ weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr(), false),
+ base::TimeDelta::FromSeconds(kVisibilityGapTolerance));
+}
+
+void ChromeVisibilityObserver::OnBrowserRemoved(Browser* browser) {
+ if (BrowserList::GetInstance()->empty()) {
+ CancelVisibilityChange();
+ SendVisibilityChangeEvent(false);
+ }
+}
+
+} // namespace metrics

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698