Chromium Code Reviews| Index: src/interpreter/bytecodes.cc |
| diff --git a/src/interpreter/bytecodes.cc b/src/interpreter/bytecodes.cc |
| index 825014e465613ecb0073f5511ae333931e481ec2..21ec29f4b614473110e459dceeca64e73b9cdec5 100644 |
| --- a/src/interpreter/bytecodes.cc |
| +++ b/src/interpreter/bytecodes.cc |
| @@ -569,6 +569,32 @@ bool Bytecodes::IsRegisterOutputOperandType(OperandType operand_type) { |
| } |
| // static |
| +bool Bytecodes::IsStarLookahead(Bytecode bytecode, OperandScale operand_scale) { |
| + if (operand_scale == OperandScale::kSingle) { |
| + switch (bytecode) { |
| + case Bytecode::kLdaZero: |
|
oth
2016/07/18 08:05:40
Is there data driving the selected bytecodes here?
klaasb
2016/07/18 09:48:54
Some experiments are in the earlier patchsets (alt
|
| + case Bytecode::kLdaSmi: |
| + case Bytecode::kLdaNull: |
| + case Bytecode::kLdaConstant: |
| + case Bytecode::kMov: |
|
rmcilroy
2016/07/18 11:07:51
kMov seems an unusual one since it doesn't update
klaasb
2016/07/18 15:15:28
I thought about that too. It is the top 10-20 for
|
| + case Bytecode::kAdd: |
| + case Bytecode::kSub: |
| + case Bytecode::kMul: |
| + case Bytecode::kAddSmi: |
| + case Bytecode::kSubSmi: |
| + case Bytecode::kInc: |
| + case Bytecode::kDec: |
| + case Bytecode::kCall: |
| + case Bytecode::kNew: |
| + return true; |
| + default: |
| + return false; |
| + } |
| + } |
| + return false; |
| +} |
| + |
| +// static |
| int Bytecodes::GetNumberOfRegistersRepresentedBy(OperandType operand_type) { |
| switch (operand_type) { |
| case OperandType::kMaybeReg: |