Prepare animation-effect-timing-easing for upstreaming

Prepare animation-effect-timing-easing for upstreaming

BUG=623437

[dstockwell, 2016-07-12 00:25:57]

dstockwell@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ alancutter@chromium.org, suzyh@chromium.org

[suzyh_UTC10 (ex-contributor), 2016-07-12 00:30:06]

lgtm

[alancutter (OOO until 2018), 2016-07-12 01:59:35]

I think these are already covered by interfaces/Animatable/animate.html, see
keyframe-utils.js.

https://codereview.chromium.org/2137063004/diff/1/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTe...
File
third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/web-animations-api/animation-effect-timing-easing.html
(right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2137063004/diff/1/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTe...
third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/web-animations-api/animation-effect-timing-easing.html:26:
};
We should make these regular functions rather than vars.

[dstockwell, 2016-07-12 02:11:45]

On 2016/07/12 at 01:59:35, alancutter wrote:
> I think these are already covered by interfaces/Animatable/animate.html, see
keyframe-utils.js.

But these are tests of AnimationEffectTiming.easing?
 
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/2137063004/diff/1/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTe...
> File
third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/web-animations-api/animation-effect-timing-easing.html
(right):
> 
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/2137063004/diff/1/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTe...
>
third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/web-animations-api/animation-effect-timing-easing.html:26:
};
> We should make these regular functions rather than vars.

Meh.

[suzyh_UTC10 (ex-contributor), 2016-07-13 07:05:06]

The CQ bit was checked by suzyh@chromium.org

[suzyh_UTC10 (ex-contributor), 2016-07-13 07:05:06]

lgtm

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-07-13 07:05:36]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-07-13 08:10:15]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-07-13 08:10:16]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  win_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_...)

[suzyh_UTC10 (ex-contributor), 2016-07-13 22:41:16]

On 2016/07/13 at 08:10:16, commit-bot wrote:
> Try jobs failed on following builders:
>   win_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_...)

Doug, since test is now failing on Chrome (because the special linear case has
not been removed yet), this test needs an -expected file in order for this patch
to land. Can you add one, please?

[suzyh_UTC10 (ex-contributor), 2016-07-14 01:06:04]

On 2016/07/13 at 22:41:16, suzyh wrote:
> On 2016/07/13 at 08:10:16, commit-bot wrote:
> > Try jobs failed on following builders:
> >   win_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_...)
> 
> Doug, since test is now failing on Chrome (because the special linear case has
not been removed yet), this test needs an -expected file in order for this patch
to land. Can you add one, please?

Closing in favour of https://codereview.chromium.org/2143973003