Add BlimpClientContext and factory with real and dummy implementation

blimp/client/core/blimp_client_context_impl_unittest.cc

Index: blimp/client/core/blimp_client_context_impl_unittest.cc
diff --git a/blimp/client/core/blimp_client_context_impl_unittest.cc b/blimp/client/core/blimp_client_context_impl_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b4204b107367409fffe07324c186b52238f8426
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blimp/client/core/blimp_client_context_impl_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "blimp/client/core/blimp_client_context_impl.h"
+
+#include "blimp/client/public/blimp_client_context_delegate.h"
+#include "blimp/client/public/blimp_contents.h"
+#include "blimp/client/test/test_blimp_client_context_delegate.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace blimp {
+namespace client {
+namespace {
+
+TEST(BlimpClientContextImpl, CreatedBlimpContentsGetsHelpersAttached) {
+  BlimpClientContextImpl blimp_client_context;
+  TestBlimpClientContextDelegate delegate;
+  blimp_client_context.SetDelegate(&delegate);
+
+  std::unique_ptr<BlimpContents> blimp_contents =
+      blimp_client_context.CreateBlimpContents();
+  DCHECK(blimp_contents);
+  DCHECK_EQ(blimp_contents.get(),
+            delegate.GetBlimpContentsWithLastAttachedHelpers());

[David Trainor- moved to gerrit, 2016/07/14 19:07:13]

Should we use gmock for this?

[nyquist, 2016/07/14 22:56:50]

I would love to! I'm not sure it's possible though, since the blimp_contents I
want to DCHECK against (or ... in the mock case, EXPECT_CALL against), is in
fact the return value. So I'm not sure how to correctly set up the expectations
before I call the CreateBlimpContents() method.

+}
+
+}  // namespace
+}  // namespace client
+}  // namespace blimp