Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1055)

Unified Diff: third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/layout_tests/update_test_expectations.py

Issue 2125633002: Fill out implementation of UpdateTestExpectations script (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@updateTestExpectations2
Patch Set: Quinten's Review Created 4 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/layout_tests/update_test_expectations.py
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/layout_tests/update_test_expectations.py b/third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/layout_tests/update_test_expectations.py
index 101cd9bcd9d166e6ac8c3e28f8e5b8962b03e0c6..dd7b72253e3cca352e5415dca16502cdff2f7077 100644
--- a/third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/layout_tests/update_test_expectations.py
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/layout_tests/update_test_expectations.py
@@ -60,7 +60,192 @@ class RemoveFlakesOMatic(object):
self._host = host
self._port = port
self._expectations_factory = bot_test_expectations_factory
- self.builder_results_by_path = {}
+ self._builder_results_by_path = {}
+
+ def _can_delete_line(self, test_expectation_line):
+ """Returns whether a given line in the expectations can be removed.
+
+ Uses results from builder bots to determine if a given line is stale and
+ can safely be removed from the TestExpectations file. (i.e. remove if
+ the bots show that it's not flaky.) There are also some rules about when
+ not to remove lines (e.g. never remove lines with Rebaseline
+ expectations, don't remove non-flaky expectations, etc.)
+
+ Args:
+ test_expectation_line (TestExpectationLine): A line in the test
+ expectation file to test for possible removal.
+
+ Returns:
+ True if the line can be removed, False otherwise.
+ """
+ expectations = test_expectation_line.expectations
+ if len(expectations) < 2:
+ return False
+
+ # Don't check lines that have expectations like NeedsRebaseline or Skip.
+ if self._has_unstrippable_expectations(expectations):
+ return False
+
+ # Don't check lines unless they're flaky. i.e. At least one expectation is a PASS.
+ if not self._has_pass_expectation(expectations):
+ return False
+
+ # The line can be deleted if the only expectation on the line that appears in the actual
+ # results is the PASS expectation.
+ for config in test_expectation_line.matching_configurations:
+ builder_name = self._host.builders.builder_name_for_specifiers(config.version, config.build_type)
+
+ if not builder_name:
+ _log.error('Failed to get builder for config [%s, %s, %s]',
+ config.version, config.architecture, config.build_type)
+ # TODO(bokan): Matching configurations often give us bots that don't have a
+ # builder in builders.py's exact_matches. Should we ignore those or be conservative
+ # and assume we need these expectations to make a decision?
+ return False
+
+ if builder_name not in self._builder_results_by_path.keys():
+ _log.error('Failed to find results for builder "%s"' % builder_name)
+ return False
+
+ results_by_path = self._builder_results_by_path[builder_name]
+
+ # No results means the tests were all skipped or all results are passing.
+ if test_expectation_line.path not in results_by_path.keys():
+ continue
+
+ results_for_single_test = results_by_path[test_expectation_line.path]
+
+ if self._expectations_that_were_met(test_expectation_line, results_for_single_test) != set(['PASS']):
+ return False
+
+ return True
+
+ def _has_pass_expectation(self, expectations):
+ return 'PASS' in expectations
+
+ def _expectations_that_were_met(self, test_expectation_line, results_for_single_test):
+ """Returns the set of expectations that appear in the given results.
+
+ e.g. If the test expectations is "bug(test) fast/test.html [Crash Failure Pass]"
+ and the results are ['TEXT', 'PASS', 'PASS', 'TIMEOUT'], then this method would
+ return [Pass Failure] since the Failure expectation is satisfied by 'TEXT', Pass
+ by 'PASS' but Crash doesn't appear in the results.
+
+ Args:
+ test_expectation_line: A TestExpectationLine object
+ results_for_single_test: A list of result strings.
+ e.g. ['IMAGE', 'IMAGE', 'PASS']
+
+ Returns:
+ A set containing expectations that occured in the results.
+ """
+ # TODO(bokan): Does this not exist in a more central place?
+ def replace_failing_with_fail(expectation):
+ if expectation in ('TEXT', 'IMAGE', 'IMAGE+TEXT', 'AUDIO'):
+ return 'FAIL'
+ else:
+ return expectation
+
+ actual_results = {replace_failing_with_fail(r) for r in results_for_single_test}
+
+ return set(test_expectation_line.expectations) & actual_results
+
+ def _has_unstrippable_expectations(self, expectations):
+ """Returns whether any of the given expectations are considered unstrippable.
+
+ Unstrippable expectations are those which should stop a line from being
+ removed regardless of builder bot results.
+
+ Args:
+ expectations: A list of string expectations.
+ E.g. ['PASS', 'FAIL' 'CRASH']
+
+ Returns:
+ True if at least one of the expectations is unstrippable. False
+ otherwise.
+ """
+ unstrippable_expectations = ('REBASELINE', 'NEEDSREBASELINE',
+ 'NEEDSMANUALREBASELINE', 'SLOW',
+ 'SKIP')
+ return any(s in expectations for s in unstrippable_expectations)
+
+ def _get_builder_results_by_path(self):
+ """Returns a dictionary of results for each builder.
+
+ Returns a dictionary where each key is a builder and value is a dictionary containing
+ the distinct results for each test. E.g.
+
+ {
+ 'WebKit Linux': {
+ 'test1.html': ['PASS', 'IMAGE'],
+ 'test2.html': ['PASS'],
+ },
+ 'WebKit Mac10.10': {
+ 'test1.html': ['PASS', 'IMAGE'],
+ 'test2.html': ['PASS', 'TEXT'],
+ }
+ }
+ """
+ builder_results_by_path = {}
+ for builder_name in self._host.builders.all_builder_names():
+ expectations_for_builder = (
+ self._expectations_factory.expectations_for_builder(builder_name)
+ )
+
+ if not expectations_for_builder:
+ # This is not fatal since we may not need to check these
+ # results. If we do need these results we'll log an error later
+ # when trying to check against them.
+ _log.warn('Downloaded results are missing results for builder "%s"' % builder_name)
+ continue
+
+ builder_results_by_path[builder_name] = (
+ expectations_for_builder.all_results_by_path()
+ )
+ return builder_results_by_path
+
+ def _remove_associated_comments_and_whitespace(self, expectations, removed_index):
+ """Removes comments and whitespace from an empty expectation block.
+
+ If the removed expectation was the last in a block of expectations, this method
+ will remove any associated comments and whitespace.
+
+ Args:
+ expectations: A list of TestExpectationLine objects to be modified.
+ removed_index: The index in the above list that was just removed.
+ """
+ was_last_expectation_in_block = (removed_index == len(expectations)
+ or expectations[removed_index].is_whitespace()
+ or expectations[removed_index].is_comment())
+
+ # If the line immediately below isn't another expectation, then the block of
+ # expectations definitely isn't empty so we shouldn't remove their associated comments.
+ if not was_last_expectation_in_block:
+ return
+
+ did_remove_whitespace = False
+
+ # We may have removed the last expectation in a block. Remove any whitespace above.
+ while removed_index > 0 and expectations[removed_index - 1].is_whitespace():
+ removed_index -= 1
+ expectations.pop(removed_index)
+ did_remove_whitespace = True
+
+ # If we did remove some whitespace then we shouldn't remove any comments above it
+ # since those won't have belonged to this expectation block. For example, commented
+ # out expectations, or a section header.
+ if did_remove_whitespace:
+ return
+
+ # Remove all comments above the removed line.
+ while removed_index > 0 and expectations[removed_index - 1].is_comment():
+ removed_index -= 1
+ expectations.pop(removed_index)
+
+ # Remove all whitespace above the comments.
+ while removed_index > 0 and expectations[removed_index - 1].is_whitespace():
+ removed_index -= 1
+ expectations.pop(removed_index)
def get_updated_test_expectations(self):
"""Filters out passing lines from TestExpectations file.
@@ -72,8 +257,25 @@ class RemoveFlakesOMatic(object):
Returns:
A TestExpectations object with the passing lines filtered out.
"""
+
+ self._builder_results_by_path = self._get_builder_results_by_path()
+
+ expectations_to_remove = []
test_expectations = TestExpectations(self._port, include_overrides=False).expectations()
- # TODO: Filter the expectations based on results.
+
+ for expectation in test_expectations:
+ if self._can_delete_line(expectation):
+ expectations_to_remove.append(expectation)
+
+ for expectation in expectations_to_remove:
+ index = test_expectations.index(expectation)
+ test_expectations.remove(expectation)
+
+ # Remove associated comments and whitespace if we've removed the last expectation under
+ # a comment block. Only remove a comment block if it's not separated from the test
+ # expectation line by whitespace.
+ self._remove_associated_comments_and_whitespace(test_expectations, index)
+
return test_expectations
def write_test_expectations(self, test_expectations, test_expectations_file):

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698