| Index: third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/layout_tests/update_test_expectations.py
|
| diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/layout_tests/update_test_expectations.py b/third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/layout_tests/update_test_expectations.py
|
| index 101cd9bcd9d166e6ac8c3e28f8e5b8962b03e0c6..dd7b72253e3cca352e5415dca16502cdff2f7077 100644
|
| --- a/third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/layout_tests/update_test_expectations.py
|
| +++ b/third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/layout_tests/update_test_expectations.py
|
| @@ -60,7 +60,192 @@ class RemoveFlakesOMatic(object):
|
| self._host = host
|
| self._port = port
|
| self._expectations_factory = bot_test_expectations_factory
|
| - self.builder_results_by_path = {}
|
| + self._builder_results_by_path = {}
|
| +
|
| + def _can_delete_line(self, test_expectation_line):
|
| + """Returns whether a given line in the expectations can be removed.
|
| +
|
| + Uses results from builder bots to determine if a given line is stale and
|
| + can safely be removed from the TestExpectations file. (i.e. remove if
|
| + the bots show that it's not flaky.) There are also some rules about when
|
| + not to remove lines (e.g. never remove lines with Rebaseline
|
| + expectations, don't remove non-flaky expectations, etc.)
|
| +
|
| + Args:
|
| + test_expectation_line (TestExpectationLine): A line in the test
|
| + expectation file to test for possible removal.
|
| +
|
| + Returns:
|
| + True if the line can be removed, False otherwise.
|
| + """
|
| + expectations = test_expectation_line.expectations
|
| + if len(expectations) < 2:
|
| + return False
|
| +
|
| + # Don't check lines that have expectations like NeedsRebaseline or Skip.
|
| + if self._has_unstrippable_expectations(expectations):
|
| + return False
|
| +
|
| + # Don't check lines unless they're flaky. i.e. At least one expectation is a PASS.
|
| + if not self._has_pass_expectation(expectations):
|
| + return False
|
| +
|
| + # The line can be deleted if the only expectation on the line that appears in the actual
|
| + # results is the PASS expectation.
|
| + for config in test_expectation_line.matching_configurations:
|
| + builder_name = self._host.builders.builder_name_for_specifiers(config.version, config.build_type)
|
| +
|
| + if not builder_name:
|
| + _log.error('Failed to get builder for config [%s, %s, %s]',
|
| + config.version, config.architecture, config.build_type)
|
| + # TODO(bokan): Matching configurations often give us bots that don't have a
|
| + # builder in builders.py's exact_matches. Should we ignore those or be conservative
|
| + # and assume we need these expectations to make a decision?
|
| + return False
|
| +
|
| + if builder_name not in self._builder_results_by_path.keys():
|
| + _log.error('Failed to find results for builder "%s"' % builder_name)
|
| + return False
|
| +
|
| + results_by_path = self._builder_results_by_path[builder_name]
|
| +
|
| + # No results means the tests were all skipped or all results are passing.
|
| + if test_expectation_line.path not in results_by_path.keys():
|
| + continue
|
| +
|
| + results_for_single_test = results_by_path[test_expectation_line.path]
|
| +
|
| + if self._expectations_that_were_met(test_expectation_line, results_for_single_test) != set(['PASS']):
|
| + return False
|
| +
|
| + return True
|
| +
|
| + def _has_pass_expectation(self, expectations):
|
| + return 'PASS' in expectations
|
| +
|
| + def _expectations_that_were_met(self, test_expectation_line, results_for_single_test):
|
| + """Returns the set of expectations that appear in the given results.
|
| +
|
| + e.g. If the test expectations is "bug(test) fast/test.html [Crash Failure Pass]"
|
| + and the results are ['TEXT', 'PASS', 'PASS', 'TIMEOUT'], then this method would
|
| + return [Pass Failure] since the Failure expectation is satisfied by 'TEXT', Pass
|
| + by 'PASS' but Crash doesn't appear in the results.
|
| +
|
| + Args:
|
| + test_expectation_line: A TestExpectationLine object
|
| + results_for_single_test: A list of result strings.
|
| + e.g. ['IMAGE', 'IMAGE', 'PASS']
|
| +
|
| + Returns:
|
| + A set containing expectations that occured in the results.
|
| + """
|
| + # TODO(bokan): Does this not exist in a more central place?
|
| + def replace_failing_with_fail(expectation):
|
| + if expectation in ('TEXT', 'IMAGE', 'IMAGE+TEXT', 'AUDIO'):
|
| + return 'FAIL'
|
| + else:
|
| + return expectation
|
| +
|
| + actual_results = {replace_failing_with_fail(r) for r in results_for_single_test}
|
| +
|
| + return set(test_expectation_line.expectations) & actual_results
|
| +
|
| + def _has_unstrippable_expectations(self, expectations):
|
| + """Returns whether any of the given expectations are considered unstrippable.
|
| +
|
| + Unstrippable expectations are those which should stop a line from being
|
| + removed regardless of builder bot results.
|
| +
|
| + Args:
|
| + expectations: A list of string expectations.
|
| + E.g. ['PASS', 'FAIL' 'CRASH']
|
| +
|
| + Returns:
|
| + True if at least one of the expectations is unstrippable. False
|
| + otherwise.
|
| + """
|
| + unstrippable_expectations = ('REBASELINE', 'NEEDSREBASELINE',
|
| + 'NEEDSMANUALREBASELINE', 'SLOW',
|
| + 'SKIP')
|
| + return any(s in expectations for s in unstrippable_expectations)
|
| +
|
| + def _get_builder_results_by_path(self):
|
| + """Returns a dictionary of results for each builder.
|
| +
|
| + Returns a dictionary where each key is a builder and value is a dictionary containing
|
| + the distinct results for each test. E.g.
|
| +
|
| + {
|
| + 'WebKit Linux': {
|
| + 'test1.html': ['PASS', 'IMAGE'],
|
| + 'test2.html': ['PASS'],
|
| + },
|
| + 'WebKit Mac10.10': {
|
| + 'test1.html': ['PASS', 'IMAGE'],
|
| + 'test2.html': ['PASS', 'TEXT'],
|
| + }
|
| + }
|
| + """
|
| + builder_results_by_path = {}
|
| + for builder_name in self._host.builders.all_builder_names():
|
| + expectations_for_builder = (
|
| + self._expectations_factory.expectations_for_builder(builder_name)
|
| + )
|
| +
|
| + if not expectations_for_builder:
|
| + # This is not fatal since we may not need to check these
|
| + # results. If we do need these results we'll log an error later
|
| + # when trying to check against them.
|
| + _log.warn('Downloaded results are missing results for builder "%s"' % builder_name)
|
| + continue
|
| +
|
| + builder_results_by_path[builder_name] = (
|
| + expectations_for_builder.all_results_by_path()
|
| + )
|
| + return builder_results_by_path
|
| +
|
| + def _remove_associated_comments_and_whitespace(self, expectations, removed_index):
|
| + """Removes comments and whitespace from an empty expectation block.
|
| +
|
| + If the removed expectation was the last in a block of expectations, this method
|
| + will remove any associated comments and whitespace.
|
| +
|
| + Args:
|
| + expectations: A list of TestExpectationLine objects to be modified.
|
| + removed_index: The index in the above list that was just removed.
|
| + """
|
| + was_last_expectation_in_block = (removed_index == len(expectations)
|
| + or expectations[removed_index].is_whitespace()
|
| + or expectations[removed_index].is_comment())
|
| +
|
| + # If the line immediately below isn't another expectation, then the block of
|
| + # expectations definitely isn't empty so we shouldn't remove their associated comments.
|
| + if not was_last_expectation_in_block:
|
| + return
|
| +
|
| + did_remove_whitespace = False
|
| +
|
| + # We may have removed the last expectation in a block. Remove any whitespace above.
|
| + while removed_index > 0 and expectations[removed_index - 1].is_whitespace():
|
| + removed_index -= 1
|
| + expectations.pop(removed_index)
|
| + did_remove_whitespace = True
|
| +
|
| + # If we did remove some whitespace then we shouldn't remove any comments above it
|
| + # since those won't have belonged to this expectation block. For example, commented
|
| + # out expectations, or a section header.
|
| + if did_remove_whitespace:
|
| + return
|
| +
|
| + # Remove all comments above the removed line.
|
| + while removed_index > 0 and expectations[removed_index - 1].is_comment():
|
| + removed_index -= 1
|
| + expectations.pop(removed_index)
|
| +
|
| + # Remove all whitespace above the comments.
|
| + while removed_index > 0 and expectations[removed_index - 1].is_whitespace():
|
| + removed_index -= 1
|
| + expectations.pop(removed_index)
|
|
|
| def get_updated_test_expectations(self):
|
| """Filters out passing lines from TestExpectations file.
|
| @@ -72,8 +257,25 @@ class RemoveFlakesOMatic(object):
|
| Returns:
|
| A TestExpectations object with the passing lines filtered out.
|
| """
|
| +
|
| + self._builder_results_by_path = self._get_builder_results_by_path()
|
| +
|
| + expectations_to_remove = []
|
| test_expectations = TestExpectations(self._port, include_overrides=False).expectations()
|
| - # TODO: Filter the expectations based on results.
|
| +
|
| + for expectation in test_expectations:
|
| + if self._can_delete_line(expectation):
|
| + expectations_to_remove.append(expectation)
|
| +
|
| + for expectation in expectations_to_remove:
|
| + index = test_expectations.index(expectation)
|
| + test_expectations.remove(expectation)
|
| +
|
| + # Remove associated comments and whitespace if we've removed the last expectation under
|
| + # a comment block. Only remove a comment block if it's not separated from the test
|
| + # expectation line by whitespace.
|
| + self._remove_associated_comments_and_whitespace(test_expectations, index)
|
| +
|
| return test_expectations
|
|
|
| def write_test_expectations(self, test_expectations, test_expectations_file):
|
|
|