Chromium Code Reviews| Index: src/IceInst.def |
| diff --git a/src/IceInst.def b/src/IceInst.def |
| index 6bd2efbf1c8463f69bb9dcd9ea969f82209c72f9..72ad03dbf7238627f30a5be7b18729e63cd62071 100644 |
| --- a/src/IceInst.def |
| +++ b/src/IceInst.def |
| @@ -88,17 +88,17 @@ |
| //#define X(tag, str) |
| #define ICEINSTICMP_TABLE \ |
| - /* enum value, printable string */ \ |
| - X(Eq, "eq") \ |
| - X(Ne, "ne") \ |
| - X(Ugt, "ugt") \ |
| - X(Uge, "uge") \ |
| - X(Ult, "ult") \ |
| - X(Ule, "ule") \ |
| - X(Sgt, "sgt") \ |
| - X(Sge, "sge") \ |
| - X(Slt, "slt") \ |
| - X(Sle, "sle") |
| -//#define X(tag, str) |
| + /* enum value, inverse, printable string */ \ |
|
John
2016/07/08 18:21:08
this is not the inverse of the condition... I woul
Jim Stichnoth
2016/07/10 13:25:32
Yeah, I think I would agree.
My suggestion now is
manasijm
2016/07/11 22:27:04
Done.
|
| + X(Eq, InstIcmp::ICond::Eq, "eq") \ |
| + X(Ne, InstIcmp::ICond::Ne, "ne") \ |
| + X(Ugt, InstIcmp::ICond::Ult, "ugt") \ |
| + X(Uge, InstIcmp::ICond::Ule, "uge") \ |
| + X(Ult, InstIcmp::ICond::Ugt, "ult") \ |
| + X(Ule, InstIcmp::ICond::Uge, "ule") \ |
| + X(Sgt, InstIcmp::ICond::Slt, "sgt") \ |
| + X(Sge, InstIcmp::ICond::Sle, "sge") \ |
| + X(Slt, InstIcmp::ICond::Sgt, "slt") \ |
| + X(Sle, InstIcmp::ICond::Sge, "sle") |
| +//#define X(tag, inverse, str) |
| #endif // SUBZERO_SRC_ICEINST_DEF |