Index: components/offline_pages/background/request_picker.cc |
diff --git a/components/offline_pages/background/request_picker.cc b/components/offline_pages/background/request_picker.cc |
index 665b39fee53977fd875c138db8e3e7bbe4729b4f..ed3c3b6a7c2023a3ad163161859188ecfbf72338 100644 |
--- a/components/offline_pages/background/request_picker.cc |
+++ b/components/offline_pages/background/request_picker.cc |
@@ -8,25 +8,37 @@ |
#include "base/logging.h" |
#include "components/offline_pages/background/save_page_request.h" |
+namespace { |
+const int kEquiavalentRequest = 0; |
dougarnett
2016/07/19 20:49:10
spelling
dougarnett
2016/07/19 20:49:11
Consider defining enum
Pete Williamson
2016/07/19 22:35:18
Changed to enum, renamed it.
Pete Williamson
2016/07/19 22:35:18
Done.
|
+const int kBetterRequest = 1; |
+const int kWorseRequest = 2; |
+} // namespace |
+ |
namespace offline_pages { |
RequestPicker::RequestPicker( |
- RequestQueue* requestQueue) |
+ RequestQueue* requestQueue, OfflinerPolicy* policy) |
: queue_(requestQueue), |
+ policy_(policy), |
weak_ptr_factory_(this) {} |
RequestPicker::~RequestPicker() {} |
+// Entry point for the async operation to choose the next request. |
void RequestPicker::ChooseNextRequest( |
RequestCoordinator::RequestPickedCallback picked_callback, |
- RequestCoordinator::RequestQueueEmptyCallback empty_callback) { |
+ RequestCoordinator::RequestQueueEmptyCallback empty_callback, |
+ DeviceConditions* device_conditions) { |
picked_callback_ = picked_callback; |
empty_callback_ = empty_callback; |
+ current_conditions_.reset(new DeviceConditions(*device_conditions)); |
// Get all requests from queue (there is no filtering mechanism). |
queue_->GetRequests(base::Bind(&RequestPicker::GetRequestResultCallback, |
weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr())); |
} |
+// When we get contents from the queue, use them to pick the next |
+// request to operate on (if any). |
void RequestPicker::GetRequestResultCallback( |
RequestQueue::GetRequestsResult, |
const std::vector<SavePageRequest>& requests) { |
@@ -37,11 +49,160 @@ void RequestPicker::GetRequestResultCallback( |
} |
// Pick the most deserving request for our conditions. |
- const SavePageRequest& picked_request = requests[0]; |
+ const SavePageRequest* picked_request = nullptr; |
+ |
+ // Iterate once through the requests, keeping track of best candidate. |
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < requests.size(); ++i) { |
+ if (!RequestConditionsSatisfied(requests[i])) { |
+ continue; |
+ } |
+ if (IsNewRequestBetter(picked_request, &(requests[i]))) |
+ picked_request = &(requests[i]); |
+ } |
+ |
+ // If we have a best request to try next, get the request coodinator to |
+ // start it. Otherwise return that we have no candidates. |
+ if (picked_request != nullptr) { |
+ picked_callback_.Run(*picked_request); |
+ } else { |
+ empty_callback_.Run(); |
+ } |
+} |
+ |
+// Filter out requests that don't meet the current conditions. For instance, if |
+// this is a predictive request, and we are not on WiFi, it should be ignored |
+// this round. |
+bool RequestPicker::RequestConditionsSatisfied(const SavePageRequest& request) { |
+ // If the user did not request the page directly, make sure we are connected |
+ // to power and have WiFi and sufficient battery remaining before we take this |
+ // reqeust. |
+ // TODO(petewil): We may later want to configure whether to allow 2G for non |
+ // user_requested items, add that to policy. |
+ if (!request.user_requested()) { |
+ if (!current_conditions_->IsPowerConnected()) |
+ return false; |
+ |
+ if (current_conditions_->GetNetConnectionType() != |
+ net::NetworkChangeNotifier::ConnectionType::CONNECTION_WIFI) { |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ |
+ if (current_conditions_->GetBatteryPercentage() < |
+ policy_->GetMinimumBatteryPercentageForNonUserRequestOfflining()) { |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ } |
+ |
+ // If we have already tried this page the max number of times, it is not |
+ // eligible to try again. |
+ // TODO(petewil): Instead, we should have code to remove the page from the |
+ // queue after the last retry. |
+ if (request.attempt_count() >= policy_->GetMaxRetries()) |
+ return false; |
+ |
+ // If this request is not active yet, return false. |
+ if (request.activation_time() > base::Time::Now()) |
+ return false; |
+ |
+ return true; |
+} |
+ |
+// Look at policies to decide which requests to prefer. |
+bool RequestPicker::IsNewRequestBetter( |
+ const SavePageRequest* oldRequest, const SavePageRequest* newRequest) { |
+ |
+ // If there is no old request, the new one is better. |
+ if (oldRequest == nullptr) |
+ return true; |
+ |
+ // User requested pages get priority. |
+ if (newRequest->user_requested() && !oldRequest->user_requested()) |
+ return true; |
+ |
+ int preference = kEquiavalentRequest; |
+ // First, see if we can decide based on the retry count. |
+ if (policy_->RetryCountIsMoreImportantThanRecency()) { |
dougarnett
2016/07/19 20:49:11
As we discussed, still more complicated than we'd
Pete Williamson
2016/07/19 22:35:18
Done.
|
+ // Check retry count first, then recency. |
+ preference = IsNewRequestRetryCountBetter(oldRequest, newRequest); |
+ if (preference == kBetterRequest) { |
+ return true; |
+ } else if (preference == kWorseRequest) { |
+ return false; |
+ } else { |
+ preference = IsNewRequestRecencyBetter(oldRequest, newRequest); |
+ if (preference == kBetterRequest) { |
+ return true; |
+ } else if (preference == kWorseRequest) { |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ } |
+ } else { |
+ // Check recency first, then retry count. |
+ preference = IsNewRequestRecencyBetter(oldRequest, newRequest); |
+ if (preference == kBetterRequest) { |
+ return true; |
+ } else if (preference == kWorseRequest) { |
+ return false; |
+ } else { |
+ preference = IsNewRequestRetryCountBetter(oldRequest, newRequest); |
+ if (preference == kBetterRequest) { |
+ return true; |
+ } else if (preference == kWorseRequest) { |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ } |
+ } |
+ |
+ // If we have no preference, defailt to prefering the old request. |
+ return false; |
+} |
+ |
+// Is the new request better as regards retry count? |
+int RequestPicker::IsNewRequestRetryCountBetter( |
+ const SavePageRequest* oldRequest, const SavePageRequest* newRequest) { |
+ // If the retry counts are equal, we have no preference. |
+ if (newRequest->attempt_count() == oldRequest->attempt_count()) |
+ return kEquiavalentRequest; |
+ |
+ // Check the policy to see if we should prefer more tried or less tried |
+ // requests. |
+ if (policy_->ShouldPreferTriedRequests()) { |
+ // We prefer more-tried requests. |
+ if (newRequest->attempt_count() > oldRequest->attempt_count()) |
+ return kBetterRequest; |
+ } else { |
+ // We prefer less-tried requests. |
+ if (newRequest->attempt_count() < oldRequest->attempt_count()) |
+ return kBetterRequest; |
+ } |
+ |
+ // If we found that this wasn't as good in the area of request count, |
+ // then we prefer the old request, and exit now. |
+ return kWorseRequest; |
+ |
+} |
+ |
+// Is the new request better in regard to how long ago it was created? |
+int RequestPicker::IsNewRequestRecencyBetter( |
+ const SavePageRequest* oldRequest, const SavePageRequest* newRequest) { |
+ // In theory requests should not have the same creation time, but if they do, |
+ // we call them equivalent. |
+ if (newRequest->creation_time() == oldRequest->creation_time()) |
+ return kEquiavalentRequest; |
+ |
+ // Should we prefer earlier requests or later ones? |
+ if (policy_->ShouldPreferEarlierRequests()) { |
+ // We prefer requests made earlier. |
+ if (newRequest->creation_time() < oldRequest->creation_time()) { |
+ return kBetterRequest; |
+ } |
+ } else { |
+ // We prefer requests made more recently. |
+ if (newRequest->creation_time() < oldRequest->creation_time()) |
+ return kBetterRequest; |
+ } |
- // When we have a best request to try next, get the request coodinator to |
- // start it. |
- picked_callback_.Run(picked_request); |
+ return kWorseRequest; |
} |
} // namespace offline_pages |