Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(125)

Unified Diff: components/offline_pages/background/request_picker.cc

Issue 2113383002: More detailed implementation of the RequestPicker (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: second round of CR comments Created 4 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: components/offline_pages/background/request_picker.cc
diff --git a/components/offline_pages/background/request_picker.cc b/components/offline_pages/background/request_picker.cc
index 665b39fee53977fd875c138db8e3e7bbe4729b4f..ed3c3b6a7c2023a3ad163161859188ecfbf72338 100644
--- a/components/offline_pages/background/request_picker.cc
+++ b/components/offline_pages/background/request_picker.cc
@@ -8,25 +8,37 @@
#include "base/logging.h"
#include "components/offline_pages/background/save_page_request.h"
+namespace {
+const int kEquiavalentRequest = 0;
dougarnett 2016/07/19 20:49:10 spelling
dougarnett 2016/07/19 20:49:11 Consider defining enum
Pete Williamson 2016/07/19 22:35:18 Changed to enum, renamed it.
Pete Williamson 2016/07/19 22:35:18 Done.
+const int kBetterRequest = 1;
+const int kWorseRequest = 2;
+} // namespace
+
namespace offline_pages {
RequestPicker::RequestPicker(
- RequestQueue* requestQueue)
+ RequestQueue* requestQueue, OfflinerPolicy* policy)
: queue_(requestQueue),
+ policy_(policy),
weak_ptr_factory_(this) {}
RequestPicker::~RequestPicker() {}
+// Entry point for the async operation to choose the next request.
void RequestPicker::ChooseNextRequest(
RequestCoordinator::RequestPickedCallback picked_callback,
- RequestCoordinator::RequestQueueEmptyCallback empty_callback) {
+ RequestCoordinator::RequestQueueEmptyCallback empty_callback,
+ DeviceConditions* device_conditions) {
picked_callback_ = picked_callback;
empty_callback_ = empty_callback;
+ current_conditions_.reset(new DeviceConditions(*device_conditions));
// Get all requests from queue (there is no filtering mechanism).
queue_->GetRequests(base::Bind(&RequestPicker::GetRequestResultCallback,
weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr()));
}
+// When we get contents from the queue, use them to pick the next
+// request to operate on (if any).
void RequestPicker::GetRequestResultCallback(
RequestQueue::GetRequestsResult,
const std::vector<SavePageRequest>& requests) {
@@ -37,11 +49,160 @@ void RequestPicker::GetRequestResultCallback(
}
// Pick the most deserving request for our conditions.
- const SavePageRequest& picked_request = requests[0];
+ const SavePageRequest* picked_request = nullptr;
+
+ // Iterate once through the requests, keeping track of best candidate.
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < requests.size(); ++i) {
+ if (!RequestConditionsSatisfied(requests[i])) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (IsNewRequestBetter(picked_request, &(requests[i])))
+ picked_request = &(requests[i]);
+ }
+
+ // If we have a best request to try next, get the request coodinator to
+ // start it. Otherwise return that we have no candidates.
+ if (picked_request != nullptr) {
+ picked_callback_.Run(*picked_request);
+ } else {
+ empty_callback_.Run();
+ }
+}
+
+// Filter out requests that don't meet the current conditions. For instance, if
+// this is a predictive request, and we are not on WiFi, it should be ignored
+// this round.
+bool RequestPicker::RequestConditionsSatisfied(const SavePageRequest& request) {
+ // If the user did not request the page directly, make sure we are connected
+ // to power and have WiFi and sufficient battery remaining before we take this
+ // reqeust.
+ // TODO(petewil): We may later want to configure whether to allow 2G for non
+ // user_requested items, add that to policy.
+ if (!request.user_requested()) {
+ if (!current_conditions_->IsPowerConnected())
+ return false;
+
+ if (current_conditions_->GetNetConnectionType() !=
+ net::NetworkChangeNotifier::ConnectionType::CONNECTION_WIFI) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (current_conditions_->GetBatteryPercentage() <
+ policy_->GetMinimumBatteryPercentageForNonUserRequestOfflining()) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // If we have already tried this page the max number of times, it is not
+ // eligible to try again.
+ // TODO(petewil): Instead, we should have code to remove the page from the
+ // queue after the last retry.
+ if (request.attempt_count() >= policy_->GetMaxRetries())
+ return false;
+
+ // If this request is not active yet, return false.
+ if (request.activation_time() > base::Time::Now())
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+// Look at policies to decide which requests to prefer.
+bool RequestPicker::IsNewRequestBetter(
+ const SavePageRequest* oldRequest, const SavePageRequest* newRequest) {
+
+ // If there is no old request, the new one is better.
+ if (oldRequest == nullptr)
+ return true;
+
+ // User requested pages get priority.
+ if (newRequest->user_requested() && !oldRequest->user_requested())
+ return true;
+
+ int preference = kEquiavalentRequest;
+ // First, see if we can decide based on the retry count.
+ if (policy_->RetryCountIsMoreImportantThanRecency()) {
dougarnett 2016/07/19 20:49:11 As we discussed, still more complicated than we'd
Pete Williamson 2016/07/19 22:35:18 Done.
+ // Check retry count first, then recency.
+ preference = IsNewRequestRetryCountBetter(oldRequest, newRequest);
+ if (preference == kBetterRequest) {
+ return true;
+ } else if (preference == kWorseRequest) {
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ preference = IsNewRequestRecencyBetter(oldRequest, newRequest);
+ if (preference == kBetterRequest) {
+ return true;
+ } else if (preference == kWorseRequest) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+ } else {
+ // Check recency first, then retry count.
+ preference = IsNewRequestRecencyBetter(oldRequest, newRequest);
+ if (preference == kBetterRequest) {
+ return true;
+ } else if (preference == kWorseRequest) {
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ preference = IsNewRequestRetryCountBetter(oldRequest, newRequest);
+ if (preference == kBetterRequest) {
+ return true;
+ } else if (preference == kWorseRequest) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // If we have no preference, defailt to prefering the old request.
+ return false;
+}
+
+// Is the new request better as regards retry count?
+int RequestPicker::IsNewRequestRetryCountBetter(
+ const SavePageRequest* oldRequest, const SavePageRequest* newRequest) {
+ // If the retry counts are equal, we have no preference.
+ if (newRequest->attempt_count() == oldRequest->attempt_count())
+ return kEquiavalentRequest;
+
+ // Check the policy to see if we should prefer more tried or less tried
+ // requests.
+ if (policy_->ShouldPreferTriedRequests()) {
+ // We prefer more-tried requests.
+ if (newRequest->attempt_count() > oldRequest->attempt_count())
+ return kBetterRequest;
+ } else {
+ // We prefer less-tried requests.
+ if (newRequest->attempt_count() < oldRequest->attempt_count())
+ return kBetterRequest;
+ }
+
+ // If we found that this wasn't as good in the area of request count,
+ // then we prefer the old request, and exit now.
+ return kWorseRequest;
+
+}
+
+// Is the new request better in regard to how long ago it was created?
+int RequestPicker::IsNewRequestRecencyBetter(
+ const SavePageRequest* oldRequest, const SavePageRequest* newRequest) {
+ // In theory requests should not have the same creation time, but if they do,
+ // we call them equivalent.
+ if (newRequest->creation_time() == oldRequest->creation_time())
+ return kEquiavalentRequest;
+
+ // Should we prefer earlier requests or later ones?
+ if (policy_->ShouldPreferEarlierRequests()) {
+ // We prefer requests made earlier.
+ if (newRequest->creation_time() < oldRequest->creation_time()) {
+ return kBetterRequest;
+ }
+ } else {
+ // We prefer requests made more recently.
+ if (newRequest->creation_time() < oldRequest->creation_time())
+ return kBetterRequest;
+ }
- // When we have a best request to try next, get the request coodinator to
- // start it.
- picked_callback_.Run(picked_request);
+ return kWorseRequest;
}
} // namespace offline_pages
« no previous file with comments | « components/offline_pages/background/request_picker.h ('k') | components/offline_pages/background/request_picker_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698