Replace HeapNumber as doublebox with an explicit MutableHeapNumber.

test/cctest/test-heap-profiler.cc

Index: test/cctest/test-heap-profiler.cc
diff --git a/test/cctest/test-heap-profiler.cc b/test/cctest/test-heap-profiler.cc
index f1ccc571dabcfef9766da81c7f6a367cef469838..58a70c5abb4489acff94535468ff837711b162d7 100644
--- a/test/cctest/test-heap-profiler.cc
+++ b/test/cctest/test-heap-profiler.cc
@@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ TEST(GetHeapValueForNode) {
   v8::HandleScope scope(env->GetIsolate());
   v8::HeapProfiler* heap_profiler = env->GetIsolate()->GetHeapProfiler();
 
-  CompileRun("a = { s_prop: \'value\', n_prop: 0.1 };");
+  CompileRun("a = { s_prop: \'value\', n_prop: \'value2\' };");
   const v8::HeapSnapshot* snapshot =
       heap_profiler->TakeHeapSnapshot(v8_str("value"));
   CHECK(ValidateSnapshot(snapshot));
@@ -1623,10 +1623,9 @@ TEST(GetHeapValueForNode) {
   CHECK(js_s_prop == heap_profiler->FindObjectById(s_prop->GetId()));
   const v8::HeapGraphNode* n_prop =
       GetProperty(obj, v8::HeapGraphEdge::kProperty, "n_prop");
-  v8::Local<v8::Number> js_n_prop =
-      js_obj->Get(v8_str("n_prop")).As<v8::Number>();
-  CHECK(js_n_prop->NumberValue() ==
-        heap_profiler->FindObjectById(n_prop->GetId())->NumberValue());
+  v8::Local<v8::String> js_n_prop =
+      js_obj->Get(v8_str("n_prop")).As<v8::String>();
+  CHECK(js_n_prop == heap_profiler->FindObjectById(n_prop->GetId()));

[Igor Sheludko, 2014/03/31 11:19:05]

Probably it would be less confusing to check that number properties are not
visible to the heap profiler:
CHECK(n_prop == NULL) or something like that. 
Or just remove the n_prop because currently the test performs the same checks
for both s_prop and n_prop.

 }