Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(953)

Unified Diff: components/gcm_driver/gcm_client_impl.cc

Issue 2111973002: Add support for GCM subtypes to desktop Instance ID implementation (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@iid9push
Patch Set: Address review comments Created 4 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: components/gcm_driver/gcm_client_impl.cc
diff --git a/components/gcm_driver/gcm_client_impl.cc b/components/gcm_driver/gcm_client_impl.cc
index e5c238dad562ce68743bff49b7c935a4732c05d6..1fb948c66e83de157a8f428c7554a23c9dede962 100644
--- a/components/gcm_driver/gcm_client_impl.cc
+++ b/components/gcm_driver/gcm_client_impl.cc
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ const char kMessageTypeDeletedMessagesKey[] = "deleted_messages";
const char kMessageTypeKey[] = "message_type";
const char kMessageTypeSendErrorKey[] = "send_error";
const char kSendErrorMessageIdKey[] = "google.message_id";
+const char kSubtypeKey[] = "subtype";
const char kSendMessageFromValue[] = "gcm@chrome.com";
const int64_t kDefaultUserSerialNumber = 0LL;
const int kDestroyGCMStoreDelayMS = 5 * 60 * 1000; // 5 minutes.
@@ -238,6 +239,21 @@ void RecordResetStoreErrorToUMA(ResetStoreError error) {
UMA_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION("GCM.ResetStore", error, RESET_STORE_ERROR_COUNT);
}
+// Helper method for DCHECKs that prevent requesting the same token both with
+// and without subtypes.
+bool InstanceIDsDifferOnlyInUseSubtype(
+ const RegistrationInfo* registration_info_a,
+ const RegistrationInfo* registration_info_b) {
+ const InstanceIDTokenInfo* token_a =
+ InstanceIDTokenInfo::FromRegistrationInfo(registration_info_a);
+ const InstanceIDTokenInfo* token_b =
+ InstanceIDTokenInfo::FromRegistrationInfo(registration_info_b);
+ return token_a && token_b && token_a->use_subtype != token_b->use_subtype &&
+ token_a->app_id == token_b->app_id &&
+ token_a->authorized_entity == token_b->authorized_entity &&
+ token_a->scope == token_b->scope;
Peter Beverloo 2016/07/28 12:34:10 nit: Could we logically separate these checks for
johnme 2016/08/04 17:47:14 Done.
+}
+
} // namespace
GCMInternalsBuilder::GCMInternalsBuilder() {}
@@ -850,6 +866,11 @@ void GCMClientImpl::Register(
const linked_ptr<RegistrationInfo>& registration_info) {
DCHECK_EQ(state_, READY);
+ // Registrations should never pass as an app_id the special category used
+ // internally when registering with a subtype. See security note in
+ // GCMClientImpl::HandleIncomingMessage.
+ CHECK_NE(registration_info->app_id, chrome_build_info_.category_for_subtypes);
+
// Find and use the cached registration ID.
RegistrationInfoMap::const_iterator registrations_iter =
registrations_.find(registration_info);
@@ -870,6 +891,11 @@ void GCMClientImpl::Register(
cached_gcm_registration_info->sender_ids) {
matched = false;
}
+ } else {
+ DCHECK(!InstanceIDsDifferOnlyInUseSubtype(
+ registration_info.get(), registrations_iter->first.get()))
+ << "Registering the same Instance ID token both with and without "
+ "subtypes is not supported";
}
if (matched) {
@@ -916,10 +942,13 @@ void GCMClientImpl::Register(
instance_id_token_info->scope;
}
+ bool use_subtype =
+ instance_id_token_info && instance_id_token_info->use_subtype;
+
RegistrationRequest::RequestInfo request_info(
- device_checkin_info_.android_id,
- device_checkin_info_.secret,
- registration_info->app_id);
+ device_checkin_info_.android_id, device_checkin_info_.secret,
+ registration_info->app_id, use_subtype,
+ chrome_build_info_.category_for_subtypes);
std::unique_ptr<RegistrationRequest> registration_request(
new RegistrationRequest(
@@ -1002,6 +1031,7 @@ void GCMClientImpl::Unregister(
NOTREACHED();
return;
}
+
request_handler.reset(new InstanceIDDeleteTokenRequestHandler(
instance_id_iter->second.first,
instance_id_token_info->authorized_entity,
@@ -1049,6 +1079,8 @@ void GCMClientImpl::Unregister(
delegate_->OnUnregisterFinished(registration_info, INVALID_PARAMETER);
return;
}
+ DCHECK(!InstanceIDsDifferOnlyInUseSubtype(registration_info.get(),
+ iter->first.get()));
registrations_.erase(iter);
gcm_store_->RemoveRegistration(
@@ -1057,10 +1089,13 @@ void GCMClientImpl::Unregister(
weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr()));
}
+ bool use_subtype =
+ instance_id_token_info && instance_id_token_info->use_subtype;
+
UnregistrationRequest::RequestInfo request_info(
- device_checkin_info_.android_id,
- device_checkin_info_.secret,
- registration_info->app_id);
+ device_checkin_info_.android_id, device_checkin_info_.secret,
+ registration_info->app_id, use_subtype,
+ chrome_build_info_.category_for_subtypes);
std::unique_ptr<UnregistrationRequest> unregistration_request(
new UnregistrationRequest(
@@ -1260,49 +1295,76 @@ void GCMClientImpl::HandleIncomingMessage(const gcm::MCSMessage& message) {
message.GetProtobuf());
DCHECK_EQ(data_message_stanza.device_user_id(), kDefaultUserSerialNumber);
- // Copying all the data from the stanza to a MessageData object. When present,
- // keys like kMessageTypeKey or kSendErrorMessageIdKey will be filtered out
- // later.
+ // Copy all the data from the stanza to a MessageData object. When present,
+ // keys like kSubtypeKey, kMessageTypeKey or kSendErrorMessageIdKey will be
+ // filtered out later.
MessageData message_data;
for (int i = 0; i < data_message_stanza.app_data_size(); ++i) {
std::string key = data_message_stanza.app_data(i).key();
message_data[key] = data_message_stanza.app_data(i).value();
}
+ std::string subtype;
+ auto subtype_iter = message_data.find(kSubtypeKey);
+ if (subtype_iter != message_data.end()) {
+ subtype = subtype_iter->second;
+ message_data.erase(subtype_iter);
+ }
+
+ // SECURITY NOTE: Subtypes that we receive from GCM *cannot* be trusted for
+ // registrations without a subtype (as the sender can pass any subtype they
+ // want). They can however be trusted for registrations that are known to have
+ // a subtype (as GCM overwrites anything passed by the sender).
+ //
+ // TODO(johnme): Get FCM to send the subtype as a trusted google.subtype key.
Peter Beverloo 2016/07/28 12:34:10 This is rather passive-aggressive :-) What about:
johnme 2016/08/04 17:47:14 I clicked on that crbug link! Done.
+ //
+ // So a given Chrome profile always passes a fixed string called
+ // |category_for_subtypes| (of the form "com.chrome.stable.macosx") as the
+ // category when registering with a subtype, and incoming subtypes are only
+ // trusted for that category.
+ //
+ // (On Android, all registrations made by Chrome on behalf of third-party
+ // apps/extensions/websites have always had a subtype, so we don't need such a
+ // check, indeed we cannot, since category is fixed to the true package name).
Peter Beverloo 2016/07/28 12:34:10 nit: avoid use of "we" (3x) in comments... All of
johnme 2016/08/04 17:47:14 Removed we's. I can't find ways to shorten these c
+ bool subtype_is_trusted = data_message_stanza.category() ==
+ chrome_build_info_.category_for_subtypes;
+ bool use_subtype = subtype_is_trusted && !subtype.empty();
+ std::string app_id = use_subtype ? subtype : data_message_stanza.category();
+
MessageType message_type = DATA_MESSAGE;
- MessageData::iterator iter = message_data.find(kMessageTypeKey);
- if (iter != message_data.end()) {
- message_type = DecodeMessageType(iter->second);
- message_data.erase(iter);
+ MessageData::iterator type_iter = message_data.find(kMessageTypeKey);
+ if (type_iter != message_data.end()) {
+ message_type = DecodeMessageType(type_iter->second);
+ message_data.erase(type_iter);
}
switch (message_type) {
case DATA_MESSAGE:
- HandleIncomingDataMessage(data_message_stanza, message_data);
+ HandleIncomingDataMessage(app_id, use_subtype, data_message_stanza,
+ message_data);
break;
case DELETED_MESSAGES:
- recorder_.RecordDataMessageReceived(data_message_stanza.category(),
- data_message_stanza.from(),
- data_message_stanza.ByteSize(),
- true,
+ recorder_.RecordDataMessageReceived(app_id, data_message_stanza.from(),
+ data_message_stanza.ByteSize(), true,
GCMStatsRecorder::DELETED_MESSAGES);
- delegate_->OnMessagesDeleted(data_message_stanza.category());
+ delegate_->OnMessagesDeleted(app_id);
break;
case SEND_ERROR:
- HandleIncomingSendError(data_message_stanza, message_data);
+ HandleIncomingSendError(app_id, data_message_stanza, message_data);
break;
case UNKNOWN:
default: // Treat default the same as UNKNOWN.
DVLOG(1) << "Unknown message_type received. Message ignored. "
- << "App ID: " << data_message_stanza.category() << ".";
+ << "App ID: " << app_id << ".";
break;
}
}
void GCMClientImpl::HandleIncomingDataMessage(
+ const std::string& app_id,
+ bool use_subtype,
const mcs_proto::DataMessageStanza& data_message_stanza,
MessageData& message_data) {
- std::string app_id = data_message_stanza.category();
std::string sender = data_message_stanza.from();
// Drop the message when the app is not registered for the sender of the
@@ -1329,15 +1391,23 @@ void GCMClientImpl::HandleIncomingDataMessage(
// Then, find among all InstanceID registrations.
if (!registered) {
- std::unique_ptr<InstanceIDTokenInfo> instance_id_token(
- new InstanceIDTokenInfo);
+ linked_ptr<InstanceIDTokenInfo> instance_id_token(new InstanceIDTokenInfo);
instance_id_token->app_id = app_id;
+ instance_id_token->use_subtype = use_subtype;
instance_id_token->authorized_entity = sender;
instance_id_token->scope = kGCMScope;
- auto instance_id_token_iter = registrations_.find(
- make_linked_ptr<RegistrationInfo>(instance_id_token.release()));
- if (instance_id_token_iter != registrations_.end())
- registered = true;
+
+ auto instance_id_token_iter = registrations_.find(instance_id_token);
+ if (instance_id_token_iter != registrations_.end()) {
+ if (InstanceIDsDifferOnlyInUseSubtype(
+ instance_id_token.get(), instance_id_token_iter->first.get())) {
+ DLOG(ERROR) << "Incoming GCM message for " << app_id
+ << " had use_subtype = " << use_subtype
+ << " which conflicts with stored registration";
+ } else {
+ registered = true;
+ }
+ }
}
recorder_.RecordDataMessageReceived(app_id, sender,
@@ -1357,6 +1427,7 @@ void GCMClientImpl::HandleIncomingDataMessage(
}
void GCMClientImpl::HandleIncomingSendError(
+ const std::string& app_id,
const mcs_proto::DataMessageStanza& data_message_stanza,
MessageData& message_data) {
SendErrorDetails send_error_details;
@@ -1370,12 +1441,9 @@ void GCMClientImpl::HandleIncomingSendError(
send_error_details.additional_data.erase(iter);
}
- recorder_.RecordIncomingSendError(
- data_message_stanza.category(),
- data_message_stanza.to(),
- data_message_stanza.id());
- delegate_->OnMessageSendError(data_message_stanza.category(),
- send_error_details);
+ recorder_.RecordIncomingSendError(app_id, data_message_stanza.to(),
+ data_message_stanza.id());
+ delegate_->OnMessageSendError(app_id, send_error_details);
}
bool GCMClientImpl::HasStandaloneRegisteredApp() const {

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698