Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(347)

Unified Diff: src/parsing/parser.cc

Issue 2109733003: Add errors for declarations which conflict with catch parameters. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git@master
Patch Set: correct loop index Created 4 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: src/parsing/parser.cc
diff --git a/src/parsing/parser.cc b/src/parsing/parser.cc
index 24df10cb9d7a4021d1541c90c77e09caee97ed6a..0192f11d85bc3a377512343fb69ac052c0640221 100644
--- a/src/parsing/parser.cc
+++ b/src/parsing/parser.cc
@@ -1929,11 +1929,10 @@ Statement* Parser::ParseStatementAsUnlabelled(
VariableProxy* Parser::NewUnresolved(const AstRawString* name,
VariableMode mode) {
- // If we are inside a function, a declaration of a var/const variable is a
+ // If we are inside a function, a declaration of a 'var' variable is a
// truly local variable, and the scope of the variable is always the function
// scope.
- // Let/const variables in harmony mode are always added to the immediately
- // enclosing scope.
+ // Let/const variables are always added to the immediately enclosing scope.
Scope* scope =
IsLexicalVariableMode(mode) ? scope_ : scope_->DeclarationScope();
return scope->NewUnresolved(factory(), name, Variable::NORMAL,
@@ -2326,11 +2325,11 @@ Block* Parser::ParseVariableStatement(VariableDeclarationContext var_context,
// VariableStatement ::
// VariableDeclarations ';'
- // The scope of a var/const declared variable anywhere inside a function
+ // The scope of a var declared variable anywhere inside a function
// is the entire function (ECMA-262, 3rd, 10.1.3, and 12.2). Thus we can
- // transform a source-level var/const declaration into a (Function)
- // Scope declaration, and rewrite the source-level initialization into an
- // assignment statement. We use a block to collect multiple assignments.
+ // transform a source-level var declaration into a (Function) Scope
+ // declaration, and rewrite the source-level initialization into an assignment
+ // statement. We use a block to collect multiple assignments.
//
// We mark the block as initializer block because we don't want the
// rewriter to add a '.result' assignment to such a block (to get compliant
@@ -3028,6 +3027,8 @@ TryStatement* Parser::ParseTryStatement(bool* ok) {
Expect(Token::RPAREN, CHECK_OK);
+ ZoneList<const AstRawString*> bound_names(1, zone());
+
if (!is_simple) {
DeclarationDescriptor descriptor;
descriptor.declaration_kind = DeclarationDescriptor::NORMAL;
@@ -3045,20 +3046,34 @@ TryStatement* Parser::ParseTryStatement(bool* ok) {
Block* init_block =
factory()->NewBlock(nullptr, 8, true, kNoSourcePosition);
PatternRewriter::DeclareAndInitializeVariables(
- init_block, &descriptor, &decl, nullptr, CHECK_OK);
+ init_block, &descriptor, &decl, &bound_names, CHECK_OK);
catch_block->statements()->Add(init_block, zone());
+ } else {
+ bound_names.Add(name, zone());
}
- // TODO(adamk): This should call ParseBlock in order to properly
- // add an additional block scope for the catch body.
- Expect(Token::LBRACE, CHECK_OK);
- while (peek() != Token::RBRACE) {
- Statement* stat = ParseStatementListItem(CHECK_OK);
- if (stat && !stat->IsEmpty()) {
- catch_block->statements()->Add(stat, zone());
+ Block* inner_block = ParseBlock(nullptr, CHECK_OK);
+ catch_block->statements()->Add(inner_block, zone());
+
+ // Check for `catch(e) { let e; }` and similar errors.
+ Scope* inner_block_scope = inner_block->scope();
+ if (inner_block_scope != nullptr) {
+ Declaration* decl =
+ inner_block_scope->CheckLexDeclarationsConflictingWith(
+ &bound_names);
+ if (decl != nullptr) {
+ const AstRawString* name = decl->proxy()->raw_name();
+ int position = decl->proxy()->position();
+ Scanner::Location location =
+ position == kNoSourcePosition
adamk 2016/07/01 19:14:04 When does this hold?
+ ? Scanner::Location::invalid()
+ : Scanner::Location(position, position + 1);
+ ParserTraits::ReportMessageAt(
+ location, MessageTemplate::kVarRedeclaration, name);
+ *ok = false;
+ return nullptr;
}
}
- Consume(Token::RBRACE);
}
block_scope->set_end_position(scanner()->location().end_pos);
block_scope = block_scope->FinalizeBlockScope();
@@ -3558,7 +3573,8 @@ Statement* Parser::ParseForStatement(ZoneList<const AstRawString*>* labels,
bool* ok) {
int stmt_pos = peek_position();
Statement* init = NULL;
- ZoneList<const AstRawString*> lexical_bindings(1, zone());
+ ZoneList<const AstRawString*> bound_names(1, zone());
+ bool bound_names_are_lexical = false;
// Create an in-between scope for let-bound iteration variables.
Scope* for_scope = NewScope(scope_, BLOCK_SCOPE);
@@ -3609,10 +3625,12 @@ Statement* Parser::ParseForStatement(ZoneList<const AstRawString*>* labels,
}
Block* init_block = nullptr;
+ bound_names_are_lexical =
+ IsLexicalVariableMode(parsing_result.descriptor.mode);
- // special case for legacy for (var/const x =.... in)
- if (!IsLexicalVariableMode(parsing_result.descriptor.mode) &&
- decl.pattern->IsVariableProxy() && decl.initializer != nullptr) {
+ // special case for legacy for (var ... = ... in ...)
+ if (!bound_names_are_lexical && decl.pattern->IsVariableProxy() &&
+ decl.initializer != nullptr) {
DCHECK(!allow_harmony_for_in());
++use_counts_[v8::Isolate::kForInInitializer];
const AstRawString* name =
@@ -3685,11 +3703,44 @@ Statement* Parser::ParseForStatement(ZoneList<const AstRawString*>* labels,
descriptor.initialization_pos = kNoSourcePosition;
decl.initializer = factory()->NewVariableProxy(temp);
+ bool is_for_var_of =
+ mode == ForEachStatement::ITERATE &&
+ parsing_result.descriptor.mode == VariableMode::VAR;
+
PatternRewriter::DeclareAndInitializeVariables(
each_initialization_block, &descriptor, &decl,
- IsLexicalVariableMode(descriptor.mode) ? &lexical_bindings
- : nullptr,
+ bound_names_are_lexical || is_for_var_of ? &bound_names
+ : nullptr,
CHECK_OK);
+
+ // Annex B.3.5 prohibits the form
+ // `try {} catch(e) { for (var e of {}); }`
+ // So if we are parsing a statement like `for (var ... of ...)`
+ // we need to walk up the scope chain and look for catch scopes
+ // which have a simple binding, then compare their binding against
+ // all of the names declared in the init of the for-of we're
+ // parsing.
+ if (is_for_var_of) {
+ Scope* catch_scope = scope_;
+ while (catch_scope != nullptr &&
+ !catch_scope->is_declaration_scope()) {
+ if (catch_scope->is_catch_scope()) {
+ auto name = catch_scope->catch_variable_name();
+ if (name !=
+ ast_value_factory()
+ ->dot_catch_string()) { // i.e. is a simple binding
+ if (bound_names.Contains(name)) {
+ ParserTraits::ReportMessageAt(
+ parsing_result.bindings_loc,
+ MessageTemplate::kVarRedeclaration, name);
+ *ok = false;
+ return nullptr;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ catch_scope = catch_scope->outer_scope();
+ }
+ }
}
body_block->statements()->Add(each_initialization_block, zone());
@@ -3704,18 +3755,17 @@ Statement* Parser::ParseForStatement(ZoneList<const AstRawString*>* labels,
body_block->set_scope(body_scope);
// Create a TDZ for any lexically-bound names.
- if (IsLexicalVariableMode(parsing_result.descriptor.mode)) {
+ if (bound_names_are_lexical) {
DCHECK_NULL(init_block);
init_block =
factory()->NewBlock(nullptr, 1, false, kNoSourcePosition);
- for (int i = 0; i < lexical_bindings.length(); ++i) {
+ for (int i = 0; i < bound_names.length(); ++i) {
// TODO(adamk): This needs to be some sort of special
// INTERNAL variable that's invisible to the debugger
// but visible to everything else.
- VariableProxy* tdz_proxy =
- NewUnresolved(lexical_bindings[i], LET);
+ VariableProxy* tdz_proxy = NewUnresolved(bound_names[i], LET);
Declaration* tdz_decl = factory()->NewVariableDeclaration(
tdz_proxy, LET, scope_, kNoSourcePosition);
Variable* tdz_var = Declare(
@@ -3742,11 +3792,10 @@ Statement* Parser::ParseForStatement(ZoneList<const AstRawString*>* labels,
return final_loop;
}
} else {
+ bound_names_are_lexical =
+ IsLexicalVariableMode(parsing_result.descriptor.mode);
init = parsing_result.BuildInitializationBlock(
- IsLexicalVariableMode(parsing_result.descriptor.mode)
- ? &lexical_bindings
- : nullptr,
- CHECK_OK);
+ bound_names_are_lexical ? &bound_names : nullptr, CHECK_OK);
}
} else {
int lhs_beg_pos = peek_position();
@@ -3827,7 +3876,7 @@ Statement* Parser::ParseForStatement(ZoneList<const AstRawString*>* labels,
// If there are let bindings, then condition and the next statement of the
// for loop must be parsed in a new scope.
Scope* inner_scope = scope_;
- if (lexical_bindings.length() > 0) {
+ if (bound_names_are_lexical && bound_names.length() > 0) {
inner_scope = NewScope(for_scope, BLOCK_SCOPE);
inner_scope->set_start_position(scanner()->location().beg_pos);
}
@@ -3849,11 +3898,11 @@ Statement* Parser::ParseForStatement(ZoneList<const AstRawString*>* labels,
}
Statement* result = NULL;
- if (lexical_bindings.length() > 0) {
+ if (bound_names_are_lexical && bound_names.length() > 0) {
BlockState block_state(&scope_, for_scope);
result = DesugarLexicalBindingsInForStatement(
- inner_scope, parsing_result.descriptor.mode, &lexical_bindings, loop,
- init, cond, next, body, CHECK_OK);
+ inner_scope, parsing_result.descriptor.mode, &bound_names, loop, init,
+ cond, next, body, CHECK_OK);
for_scope->set_end_position(scanner()->location().end_pos);
} else {
for_scope->set_end_position(scanner()->location().end_pos);
« src/ast/scopes.cc ('K') | « src/ast/scopes.cc ('k') | src/parsing/pattern-rewriter.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698