Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(388)

Unified Diff: mojo/public/cpp/system/tests/data_pipe_unittest.cc

Issue 2102263003: Split mojo/public/cpp/system/tests/core_unittest.cc, part 1. (Closed) Base URL: https://github.com/domokit/mojo.git@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « mojo/public/cpp/system/tests/core_unittest.cc ('k') | mojo/public/cpp/system/tests/handle_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: mojo/public/cpp/system/tests/data_pipe_unittest.cc
diff --git a/mojo/public/cpp/system/tests/data_pipe_unittest.cc b/mojo/public/cpp/system/tests/data_pipe_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b75eca030bc2187df23bd13d980a82da66a98d12
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mojo/public/cpp/system/tests/data_pipe_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+// This file tests the C++ wrappers in mojo/public/cpp/system/data_pipe.h.
+
+#include "mojo/public/cpp/system/data_pipe.h"
+
+#include "mojo/public/cpp/system/handle.h"
+#include "mojo/public/cpp/system/macros.h"
+#include "mojo/public/cpp/system/wait.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace mojo {
+namespace {
+
+TEST(DataPipe, Basic) {
+ // Cursory compilation tests of |MakeScopedHandle()| with data pipe handles.
+ EXPECT_FALSE(MakeScopedHandle(DataPipeProducerHandle()).is_valid());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(MakeScopedHandle(DataPipeConsumerHandle()).is_valid());
+
+ ScopedDataPipeProducerHandle ph;
+ ScopedDataPipeConsumerHandle ch;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, CreateDataPipe(nullptr, &ph, &ch));
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ph.get().is_valid());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ch.get().is_valid());
+
+ uint32_t read_threshold = 123u;
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK,
+ GetDataPipeConsumerOptions(ch.get(), &read_threshold));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0u, read_threshold);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, SetDataPipeConsumerOptions(ch.get(), 2u));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK,
+ GetDataPipeConsumerOptions(ch.get(), &read_threshold));
+ EXPECT_EQ(2u, read_threshold);
+
+ // Write a byte.
+ static const char kA = 'A';
+ uint32_t num_bytes = 1u;
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK,
+ WriteDataRaw(ph.get(), &kA, &num_bytes, MOJO_WRITE_DATA_FLAG_NONE));
+
+ // Waiting for "read threshold" should fail. (Wait a nonzero amount, in case
+ // there's some latency.)
+ MojoHandleSignalsState state;
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_DEADLINE_EXCEEDED,
+ Wait(ch.get(), MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READ_THRESHOLD, 1000, &state));
+ // ... but it should be readable.
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READABLE, state.satisfied_signals);
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READABLE | MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_PEER_CLOSED |
+ MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READ_THRESHOLD,
+ state.satisfiable_signals);
+
+ // Do a two-phase write of another byte.
+ void* write_buffer = nullptr;
+ num_bytes = 0u;
+ ASSERT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK,
+ BeginWriteDataRaw(ph.get(), &write_buffer, &num_bytes,
+ MOJO_WRITE_DATA_FLAG_NONE));
+ ASSERT_TRUE(write_buffer);
+ ASSERT_GT(num_bytes, 0u);
+ static_cast<char*>(write_buffer)[0] = 'B';
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, EndWriteDataRaw(ph.get(), 1u));
+
+ // Now waiting for "read threshold" should succeed. (Wait a nonzero amount, in
+ // case there's some latency.)
+ state = MojoHandleSignalsState();
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK,
+ Wait(ch.get(), MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READ_THRESHOLD, 1000, &state));
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READABLE | MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READ_THRESHOLD,
+ state.satisfied_signals);
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READABLE | MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_PEER_CLOSED |
+ MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READ_THRESHOLD,
+ state.satisfiable_signals);
+
+ // Read a byte.
+ char read_byte = 'x';
+ num_bytes = 1u;
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, ReadDataRaw(ch.get(), &read_byte, &num_bytes,
+ MOJO_READ_DATA_FLAG_NONE));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1u, num_bytes);
+ EXPECT_EQ('A', read_byte);
+
+ // Waiting for "read threshold" should now fail.
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_DEADLINE_EXCEEDED,
+ Wait(ch.get(), MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READ_THRESHOLD, 0, nullptr));
+
+ // Reset the read threshold/options.
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, SetDataPipeConsumerOptionsToDefault(ch.get()));
+
+ // Waiting for "read threshold" should now succeed.
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK,
+ Wait(ch.get(), MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READ_THRESHOLD, 0, nullptr));
+
+ // Do a two-phase read.
+ const void* read_buffer = nullptr;
+ num_bytes = 0u;
+ ASSERT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, BeginReadDataRaw(ch.get(), &read_buffer, &num_bytes,
+ MOJO_READ_DATA_FLAG_NONE));
+ ASSERT_TRUE(read_buffer);
+ ASSERT_EQ(1u, num_bytes);
+ EXPECT_EQ('B', static_cast<const char*>(read_buffer)[0]);
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, EndReadDataRaw(ch.get(), 1u));
+
+ // Waiting for "read" should now fail (time out).
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_DEADLINE_EXCEEDED,
+ Wait(ch.get(), MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READ_THRESHOLD, 1000, nullptr));
+
+ // Close the producer.
+ ph.reset();
+
+ // Waiting for "read" should now fail.
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_FAILED_PRECONDITION,
+ Wait(ch.get(), MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READ_THRESHOLD, 1000, nullptr));
+}
+
+} // namespace mojo
+} // namespace
« no previous file with comments | « mojo/public/cpp/system/tests/core_unittest.cc ('k') | mojo/public/cpp/system/tests/handle_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698