Index: src/parsing/pattern-rewriter.cc |
diff --git a/src/parsing/pattern-rewriter.cc b/src/parsing/pattern-rewriter.cc |
index 91d75495469b9f966641eec51f772d016a056dc6..808c0c096458cf7aa0f0c8a0809b5abe7e4e3423 100644 |
--- a/src/parsing/pattern-rewriter.cc |
+++ b/src/parsing/pattern-rewriter.cc |
@@ -677,9 +677,29 @@ void Parser::PatternRewriter::VisitAssignment(Assignment* node) { |
RelocInfo::kNoPosition); |
} |
+ // Two cases for scope rewriting the scope of default parameters: |
+ // - Eagerly parsed arrow functions are initially parsed as having |
+ // initializers in the enclosing scope, but when the arrow is encountered, |
+ // need to be in the scope of the function. |
+ // - When an extra declaration scope needs to be inserted to account for |
+ // a sloppy eval in a default parameter or function body, the initializer |
+ // needs to be in that new inner scope which was added after initial |
+ // parsing. |
+ // Each of these cases can be handled by rewriting the contents of the |
+ // initializer to the current scope. The source scope is typically the outer |
+ // scope when one case occurs; when both cases occur, both scopes need to |
+ // be included as the outer scope. (Both rewritings still need to be done |
+ // to account for lazily parsed arrow functions which hit the second case.) |
+ // TODO(littledan): Remove the outer_scope parameter of |
adamk
2016/06/22 17:55:39
How will removing this work? Is the idea to always
|
+ // RewriteParameterInitializerScope |
if (IsBindingContext() && |
descriptor_->declaration_kind == DeclarationDescriptor::PARAMETER && |
- scope()->is_arrow_scope()) { |
+ (scope()->is_arrow_scope() || scope()->is_block_scope())) { |
+ if (scope()->outer_scope()->is_arrow_scope() && scope()->is_block_scope()) { |
+ RewriteParameterInitializerScope(parser_->stack_limit(), initializer, |
+ scope()->outer_scope()->outer_scope(), |
+ scope()); |
+ } |
RewriteParameterInitializerScope(parser_->stack_limit(), initializer, |
scope()->outer_scope(), scope()); |
} |