Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(56)

Unified Diff: openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl

Issue 2072073002: Delete bundled copy of OpenSSL and replace with README. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/deps/openssl@master
Patch Set: Delete bundled copy of OpenSSL and replace with README. Created 4 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9.pl ('k') | openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-thumb.pl » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl
diff --git a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl
deleted file mode 100644
index e65291bbd9791fe7c990cd45c51c01fa30988dde..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,601 +0,0 @@
-#!/usr/bin/env perl
-
-# ====================================================================
-# Written by Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se> for the OpenSSL
-# project. The module is, however, dual licensed under OpenSSL and
-# CRYPTOGAMS licenses depending on where you obtain it. For further
-# details see http://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/.
-# ====================================================================
-
-# January 2009
-#
-# Provided that UltraSPARC VIS instructions are pipe-lined(*) and
-# pairable(*) with IALU ones, offloading of Xupdate to the UltraSPARC
-# Graphic Unit would make it possible to achieve higher instruction-
-# level parallelism, ILP, and thus higher performance. It should be
-# explicitly noted that ILP is the keyword, and it means that this
-# code would be unsuitable for cores like UltraSPARC-Tx. The idea is
-# not really novel, Sun had VIS-powered implementation for a while.
-# Unlike Sun's implementation this one can process multiple unaligned
-# input blocks, and as such works as drop-in replacement for OpenSSL
-# sha1_block_data_order. Performance improvement was measured to be
-# 40% over pure IALU sha1-sparcv9.pl on UltraSPARC-IIi, but 12% on
-# UltraSPARC-III. See below for discussion...
-#
-# The module does not present direct interest for OpenSSL, because
-# it doesn't provide better performance on contemporary SPARCv9 CPUs,
-# UltraSPARC-Tx and SPARC64-V[II] to be specific. Those who feel they
-# absolutely must score on UltraSPARC-I-IV can simply replace
-# crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9.pl with this module.
-#
-# (*) "Pipe-lined" means that even if it takes several cycles to
-# complete, next instruction using same functional unit [but not
-# depending on the result of the current instruction] can start
-# execution without having to wait for the unit. "Pairable"
-# means that two [or more] independent instructions can be
-# issued at the very same time.
-
-$bits=32;
-for (@ARGV) { $bits=64 if (/\-m64/ || /\-xarch\=v9/); }
-if ($bits==64) { $bias=2047; $frame=192; }
-else { $bias=0; $frame=112; }
-
-$output=shift;
-open STDOUT,">$output";
-
-$ctx="%i0";
-$inp="%i1";
-$len="%i2";
-$tmp0="%i3";
-$tmp1="%i4";
-$tmp2="%i5";
-$tmp3="%g5";
-
-$base="%g1";
-$align="%g4";
-$Xfer="%o5";
-$nXfer=$tmp3;
-$Xi="%o7";
-
-$A="%l0";
-$B="%l1";
-$C="%l2";
-$D="%l3";
-$E="%l4";
-@V=($A,$B,$C,$D,$E);
-
-$Actx="%o0";
-$Bctx="%o1";
-$Cctx="%o2";
-$Dctx="%o3";
-$Ectx="%o4";
-
-$fmul="%f32";
-$VK_00_19="%f34";
-$VK_20_39="%f36";
-$VK_40_59="%f38";
-$VK_60_79="%f40";
-@VK=($VK_00_19,$VK_20_39,$VK_40_59,$VK_60_79);
-@X=("%f0", "%f1", "%f2", "%f3", "%f4", "%f5", "%f6", "%f7",
- "%f8", "%f9","%f10","%f11","%f12","%f13","%f14","%f15","%f16");
-
-# This is reference 2x-parallelized VIS-powered Xupdate procedure. It
-# covers even K_NN_MM addition...
-sub Xupdate {
-my ($i)=@_;
-my $K=@VK[($i+16)/20];
-my $j=($i+16)%16;
-
-# [ provided that GSR.alignaddr_offset is 5, $mul contains
-# 0x100ULL<<32|0x100 value and K_NN_MM are pre-loaded to
-# chosen registers... ]
-$code.=<<___;
- fxors @X[($j+13)%16],@X[$j],@X[$j] !-1/-1/-1:X[0]^=X[13]
- fxors @X[($j+14)%16],@X[$j+1],@X[$j+1]! 0/ 0/ 0:X[1]^=X[14]
- fxor @X[($j+2)%16],@X[($j+8)%16],%f18! 1/ 1/ 1:Tmp=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
- fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 2/ 4/ 3:X[0,1]^=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
- faligndata @X[$j],@X[$j],%f18 ! 3/ 7/ 5:Tmp=X[0,1]>>>24
- fpadd32 @X[$j],@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 4/ 8/ 6:X[0,1]<<=1
- fmul8ulx16 %f18,$fmul,%f18 ! 5/10/ 7:Tmp>>=7, Tmp&=1
- ![fxors %f15,%f2,%f2]
- for %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 8/14/10:X[0,1]|=Tmp
- ![fxors %f0,%f3,%f3] !10/17/12:X[0] dependency
- fpadd32 $K,@X[$j],%f20
- std %f20,[$Xfer+`4*$j`]
-___
-# The numbers delimited with slash are the earliest possible dispatch
-# cycles for given instruction assuming 1 cycle latency for simple VIS
-# instructions, such as on UltraSPARC-I&II, 3 cycles latency, such as
-# on UltraSPARC-III&IV, and 2 cycles latency(*), respectively. Being
-# 2x-parallelized the procedure is "worth" 5, 8.5 or 6 ticks per SHA1
-# round. As [long as] FPU/VIS instructions are perfectly pairable with
-# IALU ones, the round timing is defined by the maximum between VIS
-# and IALU timings. The latter varies from round to round and averages
-# out at 6.25 ticks. This means that USI&II should operate at IALU
-# rate, while USIII&IV - at VIS rate. This explains why performance
-# improvement varies among processors. Well, given that pure IALU
-# sha1-sparcv9.pl module exhibits virtually uniform performance of
-# ~9.3 cycles per SHA1 round. Timings mentioned above are theoretical
-# lower limits. Real-life performance was measured to be 6.6 cycles
-# per SHA1 round on USIIi and 8.3 on USIII. The latter is lower than
-# half-round VIS timing, because there are 16 Xupdate-free rounds,
-# which "push down" average theoretical timing to 8 cycles...
-
-# (*) SPARC64-V[II] was originally believed to have 2 cycles VIS
-# latency. Well, it might have, but it doesn't have dedicated
-# VIS-unit. Instead, VIS instructions are executed by other
-# functional units, ones used here - by IALU. This doesn't
-# improve effective ILP...
-}
-
-# The reference Xupdate procedure is then "strained" over *pairs* of
-# BODY_NN_MM and kind of modulo-scheduled in respect to X[n]^=X[n+13]
-# and K_NN_MM addition. It's "running" 15 rounds ahead, which leaves
-# plenty of room to amortize for read-after-write hazard, as well as
-# to fetch and align input for the next spin. The VIS instructions are
-# scheduled for latency of 2 cycles, because there are not enough IALU
-# instructions to schedule for latency of 3, while scheduling for 1
-# would give no gain on USI&II anyway.
-
-sub BODY_00_19 {
-my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
-my $j=$i&~1;
-my $k=($j+16+2)%16; # ahead reference
-my $l=($j+16-2)%16; # behind reference
-my $K=@VK[($j+16-2)/20];
-
-$j=($j+16)%16;
-
-$code.=<<___ if (!($i&1));
- sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i
- and $c,$b,$tmp3
- ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
- fxors @X[($j+14)%16],@X[$j+1],@X[$j+1]! 0/ 0/ 0:X[1]^=X[14]
- srl $a,27,$tmp1
- add $tmp0,$e,$e
- fxor @X[($j+2)%16],@X[($j+8)%16],%f18! 1/ 1/ 1:Tmp=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
- sll $b,30,$tmp2
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- andn $d,$b,$tmp1
- add $Xi,$e,$e
- fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 2/ 4/ 3:X[0,1]^=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
- srl $b,2,$b
- or $tmp1,$tmp3,$tmp1
- or $tmp2,$b,$b
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- faligndata @X[$j],@X[$j],%f18 ! 3/ 7/ 5:Tmp=X[0,1]>>>24
-___
-$code.=<<___ if ($i&1);
- sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i
- and $c,$b,$tmp3
- ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
- fpadd32 @X[$j],@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 4/ 8/ 6:X[0,1]<<=1
- srl $a,27,$tmp1
- add $tmp0,$e,$e
- fmul8ulx16 %f18,$fmul,%f18 ! 5/10/ 7:Tmp>>=7, Tmp&=1
- sll $b,30,$tmp2
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- fpadd32 $K,@X[$l],%f20 !
- andn $d,$b,$tmp1
- add $Xi,$e,$e
- fxors @X[($k+13)%16],@X[$k],@X[$k] !-1/-1/-1:X[0]^=X[13]
- srl $b,2,$b
- or $tmp1,$tmp3,$tmp1
- fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 8/14/10:X[0,1]|=Tmp
- or $tmp2,$b,$b
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
-___
-$code.=<<___ if ($i&1 && $i>=2);
- std %f20,[$Xfer+`4*$l`] !
-___
-}
-
-sub BODY_20_39 {
-my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
-my $j=$i&~1;
-my $k=($j+16+2)%16; # ahead reference
-my $l=($j+16-2)%16; # behind reference
-my $K=@VK[($j+16-2)/20];
-
-$j=($j+16)%16;
-
-$code.=<<___ if (!($i&1) && $i<64);
- sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i
- ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
- fxors @X[($j+14)%16],@X[$j+1],@X[$j+1]! 0/ 0/ 0:X[1]^=X[14]
- srl $a,27,$tmp1
- add $tmp0,$e,$e
- fxor @X[($j+2)%16],@X[($j+8)%16],%f18! 1/ 1/ 1:Tmp=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
- xor $c,$b,$tmp0
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- sll $b,30,$tmp2
- xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1
- fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 2/ 4/ 3:X[0,1]^=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
- srl $b,2,$b
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- or $tmp2,$b,$b
- add $Xi,$e,$e
- faligndata @X[$j],@X[$j],%f18 ! 3/ 7/ 5:Tmp=X[0,1]>>>24
-___
-$code.=<<___ if ($i&1 && $i<64);
- sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i
- ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
- fpadd32 @X[$j],@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 4/ 8/ 6:X[0,1]<<=1
- srl $a,27,$tmp1
- add $tmp0,$e,$e
- fmul8ulx16 %f18,$fmul,%f18 ! 5/10/ 7:Tmp>>=7, Tmp&=1
- xor $c,$b,$tmp0
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- fpadd32 $K,@X[$l],%f20 !
- sll $b,30,$tmp2
- xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1
- fxors @X[($k+13)%16],@X[$k],@X[$k] !-1/-1/-1:X[0]^=X[13]
- srl $b,2,$b
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 8/14/10:X[0,1]|=Tmp
- or $tmp2,$b,$b
- add $Xi,$e,$e
- std %f20,[$Xfer+`4*$l`] !
-___
-$code.=<<___ if ($i==64);
- sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i
- ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
- fpadd32 $K,@X[$l],%f20
- srl $a,27,$tmp1
- add $tmp0,$e,$e
- xor $c,$b,$tmp0
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- sll $b,30,$tmp2
- xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1
- std %f20,[$Xfer+`4*$l`]
- srl $b,2,$b
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- or $tmp2,$b,$b
- add $Xi,$e,$e
-___
-$code.=<<___ if ($i>64);
- sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i
- ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
- srl $a,27,$tmp1
- add $tmp0,$e,$e
- xor $c,$b,$tmp0
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- sll $b,30,$tmp2
- xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1
- srl $b,2,$b
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- or $tmp2,$b,$b
- add $Xi,$e,$e
-___
-}
-
-sub BODY_40_59 {
-my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
-my $j=$i&~1;
-my $k=($j+16+2)%16; # ahead reference
-my $l=($j+16-2)%16; # behind reference
-my $K=@VK[($j+16-2)/20];
-
-$j=($j+16)%16;
-
-$code.=<<___ if (!($i&1));
- sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i
- ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
- fxors @X[($j+14)%16],@X[$j+1],@X[$j+1]! 0/ 0/ 0:X[1]^=X[14]
- srl $a,27,$tmp1
- add $tmp0,$e,$e
- fxor @X[($j+2)%16],@X[($j+8)%16],%f18! 1/ 1/ 1:Tmp=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
- and $c,$b,$tmp0
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- sll $b,30,$tmp2
- or $c,$b,$tmp1
- fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 2/ 4/ 3:X[0,1]^=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
- srl $b,2,$b
- and $d,$tmp1,$tmp1
- add $Xi,$e,$e
- or $tmp1,$tmp0,$tmp1
- faligndata @X[$j],@X[$j],%f18 ! 3/ 7/ 5:Tmp=X[0,1]>>>24
- or $tmp2,$b,$b
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- fpadd32 @X[$j],@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 4/ 8/ 6:X[0,1]<<=1
-___
-$code.=<<___ if ($i&1);
- sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i
- ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
- srl $a,27,$tmp1
- add $tmp0,$e,$e
- fmul8ulx16 %f18,$fmul,%f18 ! 5/10/ 7:Tmp>>=7, Tmp&=1
- and $c,$b,$tmp0
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- fpadd32 $K,@X[$l],%f20 !
- sll $b,30,$tmp2
- or $c,$b,$tmp1
- fxors @X[($k+13)%16],@X[$k],@X[$k] !-1/-1/-1:X[0]^=X[13]
- srl $b,2,$b
- and $d,$tmp1,$tmp1
- fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 8/14/10:X[0,1]|=Tmp
- add $Xi,$e,$e
- or $tmp1,$tmp0,$tmp1
- or $tmp2,$b,$b
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- std %f20,[$Xfer+`4*$l`] !
-___
-}
-
-# If there is more data to process, then we pre-fetch the data for
-# next iteration in last ten rounds...
-sub BODY_70_79 {
-my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
-my $j=$i&~1;
-my $m=($i%8)*2;
-
-$j=($j+16)%16;
-
-$code.=<<___ if ($i==70);
- sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i
- ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
- srl $a,27,$tmp1
- add $tmp0,$e,$e
- ldd [$inp+64],@X[0]
- xor $c,$b,$tmp0
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- sll $b,30,$tmp2
- xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1
- srl $b,2,$b
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- or $tmp2,$b,$b
- add $Xi,$e,$e
-
- and $inp,-64,$nXfer
- inc 64,$inp
- and $nXfer,255,$nXfer
- alignaddr %g0,$align,%g0
- add $base,$nXfer,$nXfer
-___
-$code.=<<___ if ($i==71);
- sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i
- ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
- srl $a,27,$tmp1
- add $tmp0,$e,$e
- xor $c,$b,$tmp0
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- sll $b,30,$tmp2
- xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1
- srl $b,2,$b
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- or $tmp2,$b,$b
- add $Xi,$e,$e
-___
-$code.=<<___ if ($i>=72);
- faligndata @X[$m],@X[$m+2],@X[$m]
- sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i
- ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
- srl $a,27,$tmp1
- add $tmp0,$e,$e
- xor $c,$b,$tmp0
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[$m],%f20
- sll $b,30,$tmp2
- xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1
- srl $b,2,$b
- add $tmp1,$e,$e
- or $tmp2,$b,$b
- add $Xi,$e,$e
-___
-$code.=<<___ if ($i<77);
- ldd [$inp+`8*($i+1-70)`],@X[2*($i+1-70)]
-___
-$code.=<<___ if ($i==77); # redundant if $inp was aligned
- add $align,63,$tmp0
- and $tmp0,-8,$tmp0
- ldd [$inp+$tmp0],@X[16]
-___
-$code.=<<___ if ($i>=72);
- std %f20,[$nXfer+`4*$m`]
-___
-}
-
-$code.=<<___;
-.section ".text",#alloc,#execinstr
-
-.align 64
-vis_const:
-.long 0x5a827999,0x5a827999 ! K_00_19
-.long 0x6ed9eba1,0x6ed9eba1 ! K_20_39
-.long 0x8f1bbcdc,0x8f1bbcdc ! K_40_59
-.long 0xca62c1d6,0xca62c1d6 ! K_60_79
-.long 0x00000100,0x00000100
-.align 64
-.type vis_const,#object
-.size vis_const,(.-vis_const)
-
-.globl sha1_block_data_order
-sha1_block_data_order:
- save %sp,-$frame,%sp
- add %fp,$bias-256,$base
-
-1: call .+8
- add %o7,vis_const-1b,$tmp0
-
- ldd [$tmp0+0],$VK_00_19
- ldd [$tmp0+8],$VK_20_39
- ldd [$tmp0+16],$VK_40_59
- ldd [$tmp0+24],$VK_60_79
- ldd [$tmp0+32],$fmul
-
- ld [$ctx+0],$Actx
- and $base,-256,$base
- ld [$ctx+4],$Bctx
- sub $base,$bias+$frame,%sp
- ld [$ctx+8],$Cctx
- and $inp,7,$align
- ld [$ctx+12],$Dctx
- and $inp,-8,$inp
- ld [$ctx+16],$Ectx
-
- ! X[16] is maintained in FP register bank
- alignaddr %g0,$align,%g0
- ldd [$inp+0],@X[0]
- sub $inp,-64,$Xfer
- ldd [$inp+8],@X[2]
- and $Xfer,-64,$Xfer
- ldd [$inp+16],@X[4]
- and $Xfer,255,$Xfer
- ldd [$inp+24],@X[6]
- add $base,$Xfer,$Xfer
- ldd [$inp+32],@X[8]
- ldd [$inp+40],@X[10]
- ldd [$inp+48],@X[12]
- brz,pt $align,.Laligned
- ldd [$inp+56],@X[14]
-
- ldd [$inp+64],@X[16]
- faligndata @X[0],@X[2],@X[0]
- faligndata @X[2],@X[4],@X[2]
- faligndata @X[4],@X[6],@X[4]
- faligndata @X[6],@X[8],@X[6]
- faligndata @X[8],@X[10],@X[8]
- faligndata @X[10],@X[12],@X[10]
- faligndata @X[12],@X[14],@X[12]
- faligndata @X[14],@X[16],@X[14]
-
-.Laligned:
- mov 5,$tmp0
- dec 1,$len
- alignaddr %g0,$tmp0,%g0
- fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[0],%f16
- fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[2],%f18
- fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[4],%f20
- fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[6],%f22
- fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[8],%f24
- fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[10],%f26
- fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[12],%f28
- fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[14],%f30
- std %f16,[$Xfer+0]
- mov $Actx,$A
- std %f18,[$Xfer+8]
- mov $Bctx,$B
- std %f20,[$Xfer+16]
- mov $Cctx,$C
- std %f22,[$Xfer+24]
- mov $Dctx,$D
- std %f24,[$Xfer+32]
- mov $Ectx,$E
- std %f26,[$Xfer+40]
- fxors @X[13],@X[0],@X[0]
- std %f28,[$Xfer+48]
- ba .Loop
- std %f30,[$Xfer+56]
-.align 32
-.Loop:
-___
-for ($i=0;$i<20;$i++) { &BODY_00_19($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); }
-for (;$i<40;$i++) { &BODY_20_39($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); }
-for (;$i<60;$i++) { &BODY_40_59($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); }
-for (;$i<70;$i++) { &BODY_20_39($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); }
-$code.=<<___;
- tst $len
- bz,pn `$bits==32?"%icc":"%xcc"`,.Ltail
- nop
-___
-for (;$i<80;$i++) { &BODY_70_79($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); }
-$code.=<<___;
- add $A,$Actx,$Actx
- add $B,$Bctx,$Bctx
- add $C,$Cctx,$Cctx
- add $D,$Dctx,$Dctx
- add $E,$Ectx,$Ectx
- mov 5,$tmp0
- fxors @X[13],@X[0],@X[0]
- mov $Actx,$A
- mov $Bctx,$B
- mov $Cctx,$C
- mov $Dctx,$D
- mov $Ectx,$E
- alignaddr %g0,$tmp0,%g0
- dec 1,$len
- ba .Loop
- mov $nXfer,$Xfer
-
-.align 32
-.Ltail:
-___
-for($i=70;$i<80;$i++) { &BODY_20_39($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); }
-$code.=<<___;
- add $A,$Actx,$Actx
- add $B,$Bctx,$Bctx
- add $C,$Cctx,$Cctx
- add $D,$Dctx,$Dctx
- add $E,$Ectx,$Ectx
-
- st $Actx,[$ctx+0]
- st $Bctx,[$ctx+4]
- st $Cctx,[$ctx+8]
- st $Dctx,[$ctx+12]
- st $Ectx,[$ctx+16]
-
- ret
- restore
-.type sha1_block_data_order,#function
-.size sha1_block_data_order,(.-sha1_block_data_order)
-.asciz "SHA1 block transform for SPARCv9a, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>"
-.align 4
-___
-
-# Purpose of these subroutines is to explicitly encode VIS instructions,
-# so that one can compile the module without having to specify VIS
-# extentions on compiler command line, e.g. -xarch=v9 vs. -xarch=v9a.
-# Idea is to reserve for option to produce "universal" binary and let
-# programmer detect if current CPU is VIS capable at run-time.
-sub unvis {
-my ($mnemonic,$rs1,$rs2,$rd)=@_;
-my ($ref,$opf);
-my %visopf = ( "fmul8ulx16" => 0x037,
- "faligndata" => 0x048,
- "fpadd32" => 0x052,
- "fxor" => 0x06c,
- "fxors" => 0x06d );
-
- $ref = "$mnemonic\t$rs1,$rs2,$rd";
-
- if ($opf=$visopf{$mnemonic}) {
- foreach ($rs1,$rs2,$rd) {
- return $ref if (!/%f([0-9]{1,2})/);
- $_=$1;
- if ($1>=32) {
- return $ref if ($1&1);
- # re-encode for upper double register addressing
- $_=($1|$1>>5)&31;
- }
- }
-
- return sprintf ".word\t0x%08x !%s",
- 0x81b00000|$rd<<25|$rs1<<14|$opf<<5|$rs2,
- $ref;
- } else {
- return $ref;
- }
-}
-sub unalignaddr {
-my ($mnemonic,$rs1,$rs2,$rd)=@_;
-my %bias = ( "g" => 0, "o" => 8, "l" => 16, "i" => 24 );
-my $ref="$mnemonic\t$rs1,$rs2,$rd";
-
- foreach ($rs1,$rs2,$rd) {
- if (/%([goli])([0-7])/) { $_=$bias{$1}+$2; }
- else { return $ref; }
- }
- return sprintf ".word\t0x%08x !%s",
- 0x81b00300|$rd<<25|$rs1<<14|$rs2,
- $ref;
-}
-
-$code =~ s/\`([^\`]*)\`/eval $1/gem;
-$code =~ s/\b(f[^\s]*)\s+(%f[0-9]{1,2}),(%f[0-9]{1,2}),(%f[0-9]{1,2})/
- &unvis($1,$2,$3,$4)
- /gem;
-$code =~ s/\b(alignaddr)\s+(%[goli][0-7]),(%[goli][0-7]),(%[goli][0-7])/
- &unalignaddr($1,$2,$3,$4)
- /gem;
-print $code;
-close STDOUT;
« no previous file with comments | « openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9.pl ('k') | openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-thumb.pl » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698