Delete bundled copy of OpenSSL and replace with README.

openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc

Index: openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
diff --git a/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc b/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
deleted file mode 100644
index 0864285ef6ac89d5be354ad799579f7af083f4df..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
-solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - SC4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5
-
-For the ultra sparc, SunC 4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5, running 'des_opts'
-gives a speed of 475,000 des/s while 'speed' gives 417,000 des/s.
-I believe the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler
-is able to perform when the code is 'inlined'.  For 'speed', the DES
-routines are being linked from a library.  I'll record the higher
-speed since if performance is everything, you can always inline
-'des_enc.c'.
-
-[ 16-Jan-06 - I've been playing with the
-  '-xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8plus -Xa -xO5 -Xa'
-  and while it makes the des_opts numbers much slower, it makes the
-  actual 'speed' numbers look better which is a realistic version of
-  using the libraries. ]
-
-options    des ecb/s
-16 r1 p    475516.90 100.0%
-16 r2 p    439388.10  92.4%
-16  c i    427001.40  89.8%
-16  c p    419516.50  88.2%
- 4 r2 p    409491.70  86.1%
- 4 r1 p    404266.90  85.0%
- 4  c p    398121.00  83.7%
- 4  c i    370588.40  77.9%
- 4 r1 i    362742.20  76.3%
-16 r2 i    331275.50  69.7%
-16 r1 i    324730.60  68.3%
- 4 r2 i     63535.10  13.4%	<-- very very weird, must be cache problems.
--DDES_UNROLL -DDES_RISC1 -DDES_PTR
-