Index: content/test/data/web_ui_mojo.js |
diff --git a/content/test/data/web_ui_mojo.js b/content/test/data/web_ui_mojo.js |
new file mode 100644 |
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..84ba92a2b2a80eef914c65c1da188f9b2f25168c |
--- /dev/null |
+++ b/content/test/data/web_ui_mojo.js |
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ |
+define('main', [ |
+ 'mojo/public/bindings/js/connector', |
+ 'content/test/data/web_ui_test_mojo_bindings.mojom', |
+], function(connector, bindings) { |
+ |
+ function RendererTargetTest(bindings) { |
+ this.bindings_ = bindings; |
+ } |
+ |
+ // TODO(aa): It is a bummer to need this stub object in JavaScript. We should |
+ // have a 'client' object that contains both the sending and receiving bits of |
+ // the client side of the interface. Since JS is loosely typed, we do not need |
+ // a separate base class to inherit from to receive callbacks. |
+ RendererTargetTest.prototype = |
+ Object.create(bindings.RendererTargetStub.prototype); |
+ |
+ RendererTargetTest.prototype.test = function() { |
darin (slow to review)
2014/03/21 00:04:52
it looks like these few lines are repeated below.
sky
2014/03/21 03:19:16
Good catch. The case is slightly different and thi
|
+ this.bindings_.test(); |
+ }; |
+ |
+ RendererTargetTest.prototype.Test = function() { |
+ this.bindings_.test(); |
+ }; |
+ |
+ var connection; |
+ |
+ return function(handle) { |
+ connection = new connector.Connection(handle, RendererTargetTest, |
+ bindings.RendererTargetProxy); |
+ }; |
+}); |