| Index: chrome/browser/ssl/ssl_policy.cc
|
| ===================================================================
|
| --- chrome/browser/ssl/ssl_policy.cc (revision 47323)
|
| +++ chrome/browser/ssl/ssl_policy.cc (working copy)
|
| @@ -83,15 +83,6 @@
|
| }
|
| }
|
|
|
| -void SSLPolicy::DidDisplayInsecureContent(NavigationEntry* entry) {
|
| - if (!entry)
|
| - return;
|
| -
|
| - // TODO(abarth): We don't actually need to break the whole origin here,
|
| - // but we can handle that in a later patch.
|
| - DidRunInsecureContent(entry, entry->url().spec());
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| void SSLPolicy::DidRunInsecureContent(NavigationEntry* entry,
|
| const std::string& security_origin) {
|
| if (!entry)
|
| @@ -101,16 +92,52 @@
|
| if (!site_instance)
|
| return;
|
|
|
| - backend_->MarkHostAsBroken(GURL(security_origin).host(),
|
| - site_instance->GetProcess()->id());
|
| + backend_->HostRanInsecureContent(GURL(security_origin).host(),
|
| + site_instance->GetProcess()->id());
|
| }
|
|
|
| void SSLPolicy::OnRequestStarted(SSLRequestInfo* info) {
|
| - if (net::IsCertStatusError(info->ssl_cert_status()))
|
| - UpdateStateForUnsafeContent(info);
|
| + // TODO(abarth): This mechanism is wrong. What we should be doing is sending
|
| + // this information back through WebKit and out some FrameLoaderClient
|
| + // methods.
|
| + //
|
| + // The behavior for HTTPS resources with cert errors should be as follows:
|
| + // 1) If we don't know anything about this host (the one hosting the
|
| + // resource), the resource load just fails.
|
| + // 2) If the user has previously approved the same certificate error for
|
| + // this host in a full-page interstitial, then we'll proceed with the
|
| + // load.
|
| + // 3) If we proceed with the load, we should treat the resources as if they
|
| + // were loaded over HTTP, w.r.t. the display vs. run distinction above.
|
| + //
|
| + // However, right now we don't have the proper context to understand where
|
| + // these resources will be used. Consequently, we're conservative and treat
|
| + // them all like DidRunInsecureContent().
|
| +
|
| + if (net::IsCertStatusError(info->ssl_cert_status())) {
|
| + backend_->HostRanInsecureContent(info->url().host(), info->child_id());
|
| +
|
| + // TODO(abarth): We should eventually remove the main_frame_origin and
|
| + // frame_origin properties. First, not every resource load is associated
|
| + // with a frame, so they don't always make sense. Second, the
|
| + // main_frame_origin is computed from the first_party_for_cookies, which has
|
| + // been hacked to death to support third-party cookie blocking.
|
| +
|
| + if (info->resource_type() != ResourceType::MAIN_FRAME &&
|
| + info->resource_type() != ResourceType::SUB_FRAME) {
|
| + // The frame's origin now contains mixed content and therefore is broken.
|
| + OriginRanInsecureContent(info->frame_origin(), info->child_id());
|
| + }
|
| +
|
| + if (info->resource_type() != ResourceType::MAIN_FRAME) {
|
| + // The main frame now contains a frame with mixed content. Therefore, we
|
| + // mark the main frame's origin as broken too.
|
| + OriginRanInsecureContent(info->main_frame_origin(), info->child_id());
|
| + }
|
| + }
|
| }
|
|
|
| -void SSLPolicy::UpdateEntry(NavigationEntry* entry) {
|
| +void SSLPolicy::UpdateEntry(NavigationEntry* entry, TabContents* tab_contents) {
|
| DCHECK(entry);
|
|
|
| InitializeEntryIfNeeded(entry);
|
| @@ -140,9 +167,15 @@
|
| // necessarily have site instances. Without a process, the entry can't
|
| // possibly have mixed content. See bug http://crbug.com/12423.
|
| if (site_instance &&
|
| - backend_->DidMarkHostAsBroken(entry->url().host(),
|
| - site_instance->GetProcess()->id()))
|
| - entry->ssl().set_has_mixed_content();
|
| + backend_->DidHostRunInsecureContent(entry->url().host(),
|
| + site_instance->GetProcess()->id())) {
|
| + entry->ssl().set_security_style(SECURITY_STYLE_AUTHENTICATION_BROKEN);
|
| + entry->ssl().set_ran_mixed_content();
|
| + return;
|
| + }
|
| +
|
| + if (tab_contents->displayed_insecure_content())
|
| + entry->ssl().set_displayed_mixed_content();
|
| }
|
|
|
| ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
| @@ -207,33 +240,8 @@
|
| SECURITY_STYLE_AUTHENTICATED : SECURITY_STYLE_UNAUTHENTICATED);
|
| }
|
|
|
| -void SSLPolicy::MarkOriginAsBroken(const std::string& origin, int pid) {
|
| +void SSLPolicy::OriginRanInsecureContent(const std::string& origin, int pid) {
|
| GURL parsed_origin(origin);
|
| - if (!parsed_origin.SchemeIsSecure())
|
| - return;
|
| -
|
| - backend_->MarkHostAsBroken(parsed_origin.host(), pid);
|
| + if (parsed_origin.SchemeIsSecure())
|
| + backend_->HostRanInsecureContent(parsed_origin.host(), pid);
|
| }
|
| -
|
| -void SSLPolicy::UpdateStateForMixedContent(SSLRequestInfo* info) {
|
| - // TODO(abarth): This function isn't right because we need to remove
|
| - // info->main_frame_origin().
|
| -
|
| - if (info->resource_type() != ResourceType::MAIN_FRAME &&
|
| - info->resource_type() != ResourceType::SUB_FRAME) {
|
| - // The frame's origin now contains mixed content and therefore is broken.
|
| - MarkOriginAsBroken(info->frame_origin(), info->child_id());
|
| - }
|
| -
|
| - if (info->resource_type() != ResourceType::MAIN_FRAME) {
|
| - // The main frame now contains a frame with mixed content. Therefore, we
|
| - // mark the main frame's origin as broken too.
|
| - MarkOriginAsBroken(info->main_frame_origin(), info->child_id());
|
| - }
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -void SSLPolicy::UpdateStateForUnsafeContent(SSLRequestInfo* info) {
|
| - // This request as a broken cert, which means its host is broken.
|
| - backend_->MarkHostAsBroken(info->url().host(), info->child_id());
|
| - UpdateStateForMixedContent(info);
|
| -}
|
|
|