|
OLD | NEW |
---|---|
(Empty) | |
1 # Copyright (c) 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. | |
2 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be | |
3 # found in the LICENSE file. | |
4 | |
5 # Copyright 2008 Google Inc. All Rights Reserved. | |
6 # | |
7 # Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | |
8 # you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | |
9 # You may obtain a copy of the License at | |
10 # | |
11 # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | |
12 # | |
13 # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | |
14 # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | |
15 # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | |
16 # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | |
17 # limitations under the License. | |
18 | |
19 """Utility for parsing patches, shamelessly stolen from rietveld.""" | |
20 | |
21 import logging | |
22 import re | |
23 | |
24 | |
25 _CHUNK_RE = re.compile(r""" | |
26 @@ | |
27 \s+ | |
28 - | |
29 (?: (\d+) (?: , (\d+) )?) | |
30 \s+ | |
31 \+ | |
32 (?: (\d+) (?: , (\d+) )?) | |
33 \s+ | |
34 @@ | |
35 """, re.VERBOSE) | |
iannucci
2013/08/08 10:35:20
Scary :( I really wish we had a real, robust, test
Mattias Nissler (ping if slow)
2013/08/08 13:04:13
I'm with you on this, but the python standard libr
| |
36 | |
37 | |
38 _NO_NEWLINE_MESSAGE = "\\ No newline at end of file" | |
39 | |
40 | |
41 def ParsePatchToLines(lines): | |
42 """Parses a patch from a list of lines. | |
43 | |
44 Args: | |
45 lines: The lines to parse. | |
46 | |
47 Returns: | |
48 None on error, otherwise a list of 3-tuples: | |
49 (old_line_no, new_line_no, line) | |
50 | |
51 A line number can be 0 if it doesn't exist in the old/new file. | |
iannucci
2013/08/08 10:35:20
why not None? Unless lines start at 1?
Mattias Nissler (ping if slow)
2013/08/08 13:04:13
None is indeed better. Changed.
| |
52 """ | |
53 result = [] | |
54 in_prelude = True | |
55 for line in lines: | |
56 if in_prelude: | |
57 # Skip leading lines until after we've seen one starting with '+++' | |
58 if line.startswith("+++"): | |
59 in_prelude = False | |
iannucci
2013/08/08 10:35:20
how do we exit the prelude for a multi-chunk patch
Mattias Nissler (ping if slow)
2013/08/08 13:04:13
Hunks start with @@, so we reset.
Multi-file patc
| |
60 elif line.startswith("@"): | |
61 match = _CHUNK_RE.match(line) | |
62 if not match: | |
63 logging.warn("ParsePatchToLines match failed on %s", line) | |
64 return None | |
65 old_ln = int(match.groups()[0]) | |
66 new_ln = int(match.groups()[2]) | |
67 else: | |
68 if line[0] == "-": | |
69 result.append((old_ln, 0, line[1:])) | |
70 old_ln += 1 | |
71 elif line[0] == "+": | |
72 result.append((0, new_ln, line[1:])) | |
73 new_ln += 1 | |
74 elif line[0] == " ": | |
75 result.append((old_ln, new_ln, line[1:])) | |
76 old_ln += 1 | |
77 new_ln += 1 | |
78 return result | |
OLD | NEW |