Update expectations for Ubuntu12-GTX660

Update expectations for Ubuntu12-GTX660


Move ATI5770 expectations to GTX660

BUG=skia:2325
NOTRY=true

Committed: http://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=13910

[borenet, 2014-03-24 15:39:20]

https://codereview.chromium.org/204983016/diff/1/expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu1...
File
expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu12-ShuttleA-GTX660-x86-Debug/expected-results.json
(right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/204983016/diff/1/expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu1...
expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu12-ShuttleA-GTX660-x86-Debug/expected-results.json:1:
{
These were copied from the ATI5770 expectations and modified using the
rebaseline server.  I don't think the left hand side of the diff reflects that,
though.

https://codereview.chromium.org/204983016/diff/1/expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu1...
expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu12-ShuttleA-GTX660-x86-Debug/expected-results.json:7:
},
Is the actual-results section supposed to be here? It's inherited from the
ATI5770 expectations.

[epoger, 2014-03-24 15:55:44]

lgtm

https://codereview.chromium.org/204983016/diff/1/expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu1...
File
expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu12-ShuttleA-GTX660-x86-Debug/expected-results.json
(right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/204983016/diff/1/expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu1...
expectations/gm/Test-Ubuntu12-ShuttleA-GTX660-x86-Debug/expected-results.json:7:
},
On 2014/03/24 15:39:21, borenet wrote:
> Is the actual-results section supposed to be here? It's inherited from the
> ATI5770 expectations.

It doesn't matter.  The actual-results section is ignored in expectations.

[borenet, 2014-03-24 16:01:41]

The CQ bit was checked by borenet@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-03-24 16:01:47]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://skia-tree-status.appspot.com/cq/borenet@google.com/204983016/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-03-24 16:11:12]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-03-24 16:11:12]

Retried try job too often on Build-Mac10.8-Clang-x86-Release-Trybot for step(s)
BuildBench, BuildEverything, BuildGm, BuildSkiaLib, BuildTests, BuildTools
http://skia-tree-status-staging.appspot.com/redirect/compile-buildbots/builds...

[epoger, 2014-03-24 16:15:32]

On 2014/03/24 16:11:12, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> Retried try job too often on Build-Mac10.8-Clang-x86-Release-Trybot for
step(s)
> BuildBench, BuildEverything, BuildGm, BuildSkiaLib, BuildTests, BuildTools
>
http://skia-tree-status-staging.appspot.com/redirect/compile-buildbots/builds...

WTF CQ???

[borenet, 2014-03-24 16:58:26]

The CQ bit was checked by borenet@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-03-24 16:58:29]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://skia-tree-status.appspot.com/cq/borenet@google.com/204983016/10001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-03-24 16:59:29]

Change committed as 13910

[mtklein, 2014-03-24 22:38:34]

On 2014/03/24 16:59:29, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> Change committed as 13910

The GTX660 bots were all green before this CL and are now failing in GM compare.
 Is this intended?  Seems like the opposite of intended?

Is it, we're going here from Missing to Wrong, to be rebaselined into Right
later?

[borenet, 2014-03-25 12:24:52]

On 2014/03/24 22:38:34, mtklein wrote:
> On 2014/03/24 16:59:29, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> > Change committed as 13910
> 
> The GTX660 bots were all green before this CL and are now failing in GM
compare.
>  Is this intended?  Seems like the opposite of intended?
> 
> Is it, we're going here from Missing to Wrong, to be rebaselined into Right
> later?

Yeah, there weren't any expectations before.  There are ~100 GMs failing
comparison per bot.  I'm desperately hoping all of them aren't flaky.