Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1247)

Unified Diff: mojo/edk/system/data_pipe.cc

Issue 2045003002: Make the data pipe "cancel all state" functions cancel two-phase operations. (Closed) Base URL: https://github.com/domokit/mojo.git@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « mojo/edk/system/data_pipe.h ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: mojo/edk/system/data_pipe.cc
diff --git a/mojo/edk/system/data_pipe.cc b/mojo/edk/system/data_pipe.cc
index 7657f644c1140bad11782a87de3b2d93ca41eeb0..d671a7625e93043f18e3a09f7aea4e76aeaf5b1d 100644
--- a/mojo/edk/system/data_pipe.cc
+++ b/mojo/edk/system/data_pipe.cc
@@ -272,8 +272,7 @@ bool DataPipe::ConsumerDeserialize(Channel* channel,
void DataPipe::ProducerCancelAllState() {
MutexLocker locker(&mutex_);
- DCHECK(has_local_producer_no_lock());
- producer_awakable_list_->CancelAll();
+ ProducerCancelAllStateNoLock();
}
void DataPipe::ProducerClose() {
@@ -450,15 +449,8 @@ bool DataPipe::ProducerEndSerialize(
bool rv = impl_->ProducerEndSerialize(channel, destination, actual_size,
platform_handles);
- // TODO(vtl): The code below is similar to, but not quite the same as,
- // |ProducerCloseNoLock()|.
- DCHECK(has_local_producer_no_lock());
- producer_awakable_list_->CancelAll();
+ ProducerCancelAllStateNoLock();
producer_awakable_list_.reset();
- // Not a bug, except possibly in "user" code.
- DVLOG_IF(2, producer_in_two_phase_write_no_lock())
- << "Producer transferred with active two-phase write";
- producer_two_phase_max_num_bytes_written_ = 0;
if (!has_local_consumer_no_lock())
producer_open_ = false;
@@ -472,8 +464,7 @@ bool DataPipe::ProducerIsBusy() const {
void DataPipe::ConsumerCancelAllState() {
MutexLocker locker(&mutex_);
- DCHECK(has_local_consumer_no_lock());
- consumer_awakable_list_->CancelAll();
+ ConsumerCancelAllStateNoLock();
}
void DataPipe::ConsumerClose() {
@@ -682,14 +673,8 @@ bool DataPipe::ConsumerEndSerialize(
bool rv = impl_->ConsumerEndSerialize(channel, destination, actual_size,
platform_handles);
- // TODO(vtl): The code below is similar to, but not quite the same as,
- // |ConsumerCloseNoLock()|.
- consumer_awakable_list_->CancelAll();
+ ConsumerCancelAllStateNoLock();
consumer_awakable_list_.reset();
- // Not a bug, except possibly in "user" code.
- DVLOG_IF(2, consumer_in_two_phase_read_no_lock())
- << "Consumer transferred with active two-phase read";
- consumer_two_phase_max_num_bytes_read_ = 0;
if (!has_local_producer_no_lock())
consumer_open_ = false;
@@ -747,6 +732,26 @@ std::unique_ptr<DataPipeImpl> DataPipe::ReplaceImplNoLock(
return rv;
}
+void DataPipe::ProducerCancelAllStateNoLock() {
+ DCHECK(has_local_producer_no_lock());
+ if (producer_awakable_list_)
+ producer_awakable_list_->CancelAll();
+ // Not a bug, except possibly in "user" code.
+ DVLOG_IF(2, producer_in_two_phase_write_no_lock())
+ << "Active two-phase write cancelled";
+ producer_two_phase_max_num_bytes_written_ = 0;
+}
+
+void DataPipe::ConsumerCancelAllStateNoLock() {
+ DCHECK(has_local_consumer_no_lock());
+ if (consumer_awakable_list_)
+ consumer_awakable_list_->CancelAll();
+ // Not a bug, except possibly in "user" code.
+ DVLOG_IF(2, consumer_in_two_phase_read_no_lock())
+ << "Active two-phase read cancelled";
+ consumer_two_phase_max_num_bytes_read_ = 0;
+}
+
void DataPipe::SetProducerClosedNoLock() {
mutex_.AssertHeld();
DCHECK(!has_local_producer_no_lock());
@@ -766,11 +771,8 @@ void DataPipe::ProducerCloseNoLock() {
DCHECK(producer_open_);
producer_open_ = false;
if (has_local_producer_no_lock()) {
+ ProducerCancelAllStateNoLock();
producer_awakable_list_.reset();
- // Not a bug, except possibly in "user" code.
- DVLOG_IF(2, producer_in_two_phase_write_no_lock())
- << "Producer closed with active two-phase write";
- producer_two_phase_max_num_bytes_written_ = 0;
impl_->ProducerClose();
AwakeConsumerAwakablesForStateChangeNoLock(
impl_->ConsumerGetHandleSignalsState());
@@ -782,11 +784,8 @@ void DataPipe::ConsumerCloseNoLock() {
DCHECK(consumer_open_);
consumer_open_ = false;
if (has_local_consumer_no_lock()) {
+ ConsumerCancelAllStateNoLock();
consumer_awakable_list_.reset();
- // Not a bug, except possibly in "user" code.
- DVLOG_IF(2, consumer_in_two_phase_read_no_lock())
- << "Consumer closed with active two-phase read";
- consumer_two_phase_max_num_bytes_read_ = 0;
impl_->ConsumerClose();
AwakeProducerAwakablesForStateChangeNoLock(
impl_->ProducerGetHandleSignalsState());
« no previous file with comments | « mojo/edk/system/data_pipe.h ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698