Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(611)

Unified Diff: base/threading/task_runner_handle.cc

Issue 2042383004: Introduce TaskRunnerHandle. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: +tests Created 4 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: base/threading/task_runner_handle.cc
diff --git a/base/threading/task_runner_handle.cc b/base/threading/task_runner_handle.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3a29ab5b222921cc86a10e867487ae34edffe06c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/base/threading/task_runner_handle.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "base/threading/task_runner_handle.h"
+
+#include <utility>
+
+#include "base/lazy_instance.h"
+#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "base/sequenced_task_runner.h"
+#include "base/single_thread_task_runner.h"
+#include "base/task_runner.h"
+#include "base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool.h"
+#include "base/threading/thread_local.h"
+
+namespace base {
+
+namespace {
+
+// Thread-local TaskScopes, at most one of these should be set at a time on any
+// given thread.
+LazyInstance<ThreadLocalPointer<TaskRunnerHandle::TaskScope>>::Leaky
+ task_scope_tls = LAZY_INSTANCE_INITIALIZER;
+LazyInstance<ThreadLocalPointer<TaskRunnerHandle::SequencedTaskScope>>::Leaky
+ sequenced_task_scope_tls = LAZY_INSTANCE_INITIALIZER;
+LazyInstance<ThreadLocalPointer<TaskRunnerHandle::SingleThreadTaskScope>>::Leaky
+ single_thread_task_scope_tls = LAZY_INSTANCE_INITIALIZER;
+
+} // namespace
+
+scoped_refptr<TaskRunner> TaskRunnerHandle::Get() {
+ DCHECK(HasTaskScope());
+
+ if (single_thread_task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Get()) {
fdoray 2016/06/08 18:10:44 if (HasSingleThreadTaskScope()) return GetSingle
gab 2016/06/08 20:29:19 That feels inconsistent (because it wouldn't be op
+ return single_thread_task_scope_tls.Pointer()
+ ->Get()
+ ->single_thread_task_runner_;
+ } else if (sequenced_task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Get()) {
+ return sequenced_task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Get()->sequenced_task_runner_;
+ }
+ return task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Get()->task_runner_;
+}
+
+scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> TaskRunnerHandle::GetSequenced() {
+ DCHECK(HasSequencedTaskScope());
+
+ if (single_thread_task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Get()) {
+ return single_thread_task_scope_tls.Pointer()
+ ->Get()
+ ->single_thread_task_runner_;
+ } else if (sequenced_task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Get()) {
+ return sequenced_task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Get()->sequenced_task_runner_;
+ }
+
+ // As a last resort, attempt to return the SequencedWorkerPool's
+ // SequencedTaskRunner, if that's the current context.
+ // TODO(gab): Remove this when SequencedWorkerPool is deprecated in favor of
+ // TaskScheduler.
+ scoped_refptr<base::SequencedTaskRunner> task_runner =
+ SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequencedTaskRunnerForCurrentThread();
+ return task_runner;
+}
+
+scoped_refptr<SingleThreadTaskRunner> TaskRunnerHandle::GetSingleThreaded() {
+ DCHECK(HasSingleThreadTaskScope());
+ return single_thread_task_scope_tls.Pointer()
+ ->Get()
+ ->single_thread_task_runner_;
+}
+
+bool TaskRunnerHandle::HasTaskScope() {
+ return task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Get() || HasSequencedTaskScope();
+}
+
+bool TaskRunnerHandle::HasSequencedTaskScope() {
+ return sequenced_task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Get() ||
+ SequencedWorkerPool::GetWorkerPoolForCurrentThread() ||
+ HasSingleThreadTaskScope();
+}
+
+bool TaskRunnerHandle::HasSingleThreadTaskScope() {
+ return !!single_thread_task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Get();
+}
+
+TaskRunnerHandle::TaskScope::TaskScope(scoped_refptr<TaskRunner> task_runner)
+ : task_runner_(std::move(task_runner)) {
+ DCHECK(task_runner_->RunsTasksOnCurrentThread());
+ DCHECK(!HasTaskScope());
+ task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Set(this);
+}
+
+TaskRunnerHandle::TaskScope::~TaskScope() {
+ DCHECK(HasTaskScope());
+ DCHECK(Get()->RunsTasksOnCurrentThread());
+ task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Set(nullptr);
+ DCHECK(!HasTaskScope());
+}
+
+TaskRunnerHandle::SequencedTaskScope::SequencedTaskScope(
+ scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> sequenced_task_runner)
+ : sequenced_task_runner_(std::move(sequenced_task_runner)) {
+ DCHECK(sequenced_task_runner_->RunsTasksOnCurrentThread());
+ DCHECK(!HasTaskScope());
+ sequenced_task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Set(this);
+}
+
+TaskRunnerHandle::SequencedTaskScope::~SequencedTaskScope() {
+ DCHECK(HasSequencedTaskScope());
+ DCHECK(GetSequenced()->RunsTasksOnCurrentThread());
+ sequenced_task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Set(nullptr);
+ DCHECK(!HasTaskScope());
+}
+
+TaskRunnerHandle::SingleThreadTaskScope::SingleThreadTaskScope(
+ scoped_refptr<SingleThreadTaskRunner> single_thread_task_runner)
+ : single_thread_task_runner_(std::move(single_thread_task_runner)) {
+ DCHECK(single_thread_task_runner_->BelongsToCurrentThread());
+ DCHECK(!HasTaskScope());
+ single_thread_task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Set(this);
+}
+
+TaskRunnerHandle::SingleThreadTaskScope::~SingleThreadTaskScope() {
+ DCHECK(HasSingleThreadTaskScope());
+ DCHECK(GetSingleThreaded()->BelongsToCurrentThread());
+ single_thread_task_scope_tls.Pointer()->Set(nullptr);
+ DCHECK(!HasTaskScope());
+}
+
+} // namespace base

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698