Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(110)

Unified Diff: media/video/h264_poc.cc

Issue 2036913002: Revert of H264POC: Allow gaps in frame_num. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « media/video/h264_poc.h ('k') | media/video/h264_poc_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: media/video/h264_poc.cc
diff --git a/media/video/h264_poc.cc b/media/video/h264_poc.cc
index 88a4a9063e569c508f4beca9be6804dde23f9ee4..164d704f13dd51eee5759fe65fd7bb0f03abea3e 100644
--- a/media/video/h264_poc.cc
+++ b/media/video/h264_poc.cc
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
ref_pic_order_cnt_lsb_ = 0;
prev_frame_num_ = 0;
prev_frame_num_offset_ = 0;
- prev_poc_ = 0;
}
// Check if a slice includes memory management control operation 5, which
@@ -63,32 +62,22 @@
return false;
}
- if (!slice_hdr.idr_pic_flag && slice_hdr.frame_num == prev_frame_num_) {
- DLOG(WARNING) << "Redundant picture passed to H264POC";
- *pic_order_cnt = prev_poc_;
- return true;
+ // TODO(sandersd): Handle |gaps_in_frame_num_value|.
+ if (prev_frame_num_ > 0 && prev_frame_num_ < slice_hdr.frame_num - 1) {
+ DLOG(ERROR) << "Gaps in frame_num are not supported";
+ return false;
}
bool mmco5 = HasMMCO5(slice_hdr);
int32_t max_frame_num = 1 << (sps->log2_max_frame_num_minus4 + 4);
int32_t max_pic_order_cnt_lsb =
1 << (sps->log2_max_pic_order_cnt_lsb_minus4 + 4);
-
- if (!slice_hdr.idr_pic_flag &&
- slice_hdr.frame_num != (prev_frame_num_ + 1) % max_frame_num) {
- // We don't do any special handling of gaps in |frame_num|, because the
- // computations below are unaffected by them. In particular, wrapping is
- // handled the same whether we simulate the missing frames or not.
- if (!sps->gaps_in_frame_num_value_allowed_flag)
- DLOG(WARNING) << "Invalid gap in frame_num";
- }
// Based on T-REC-H.264 8.2.1, "Decoding process for picture order
// count", available from http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-H.264.
//
// Reorganized slightly from spec pseudocode to handle MMCO5 when storing
// state instead of when loading it.
- int32_t poc;
switch (sps->pic_order_cnt_type) {
case 0: {
int32_t prev_pic_order_cnt_msb = ref_pic_order_cnt_msb_;
@@ -120,7 +109,7 @@
// (assuming no interlacing).
int32_t top_foc = pic_order_cnt_msb + slice_hdr.pic_order_cnt_lsb;
int32_t bottom_foc = top_foc + slice_hdr.delta_pic_order_cnt_bottom;
- poc = std::min(top_foc, bottom_foc);
+ *pic_order_cnt = std::min(top_foc, bottom_foc);
// Store state.
prev_frame_num_ = slice_hdr.frame_num;
@@ -189,7 +178,7 @@
int32_t top_foc = expected_pic_order_cnt + slice_hdr.delta_pic_order_cnt0;
int32_t bottom_foc = top_foc + sps->offset_for_top_to_bottom_field +
slice_hdr.delta_pic_order_cnt1;
- poc = std::min(top_foc, bottom_foc);
+ *pic_order_cnt = std::min(top_foc, bottom_foc);
// Store state.
prev_frame_num_ = slice_hdr.frame_num;
@@ -213,11 +202,11 @@
// 8-12, 8-13. Derive |temp_pic_order_count| (it's always the
// |pic_order_cnt|, regardless of interlacing).
if (slice_hdr.idr_pic_flag)
- poc = 0;
+ *pic_order_cnt = 0;
else if (slice_hdr.nal_ref_idc == 0)
- poc = 2 * (frame_num_offset + slice_hdr.frame_num) - 1;
- else
- poc = 2 * (frame_num_offset + slice_hdr.frame_num);
+ *pic_order_cnt = 2 * (frame_num_offset + slice_hdr.frame_num) - 1;
+ else
+ *pic_order_cnt = 2 * (frame_num_offset + slice_hdr.frame_num);
// Store state.
prev_frame_num_ = slice_hdr.frame_num;
@@ -233,7 +222,6 @@
return false;
}
- *pic_order_cnt = prev_poc_ = poc;
return true;
}
« no previous file with comments | « media/video/h264_poc.h ('k') | media/video/h264_poc_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698