Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(891)

Unified Diff: src/parser.cc

Issue 203413009: Revert "Move ParseUnaryExpression into ParserBase and add tests." (Closed) Base URL: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge
Patch Set: Created 6 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « src/parser.h ('k') | src/preparser.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: src/parser.cc
diff --git a/src/parser.cc b/src/parser.cc
index 0d1ba004b5862a9c6a560f0abeeca769a151ef35..01bd85348f5744bae34f0f93f7e3c7fb1e76973c 100644
--- a/src/parser.cc
+++ b/src/parser.cc
@@ -433,12 +433,6 @@ bool ParserTraits::IsThisProperty(Expression* expression) {
}
-bool ParserTraits::IsIdentifier(Expression* expression) {
- VariableProxy* operand = expression->AsVariableProxy();
- return operand != NULL && !operand->is_this();
-}
-
-
void ParserTraits::CheckAssigningFunctionLiteralToProperty(Expression* left,
Expression* right) {
ASSERT(left != NULL);
@@ -531,52 +525,6 @@ bool ParserTraits::ShortcutNumericLiteralBinaryExpression(
}
-Expression* ParserTraits::BuildUnaryExpression(
- Expression* expression, Token::Value op, int pos,
- AstNodeFactory<AstConstructionVisitor>* factory) {
- ASSERT(expression != NULL);
- if (expression->AsLiteral() != NULL) {
- Handle<Object> literal = expression->AsLiteral()->value();
- if (op == Token::NOT) {
- // Convert the literal to a boolean condition and negate it.
- bool condition = literal->BooleanValue();
- Handle<Object> result =
- parser_->isolate()->factory()->ToBoolean(!condition);
- return factory->NewLiteral(result, pos);
- } else if (literal->IsNumber()) {
- // Compute some expressions involving only number literals.
- double value = literal->Number();
- switch (op) {
- case Token::ADD:
- return expression;
- case Token::SUB:
- return factory->NewNumberLiteral(-value, pos);
- case Token::BIT_NOT:
- return factory->NewNumberLiteral(~DoubleToInt32(value), pos);
- default:
- break;
- }
- }
- }
- // Desugar '+foo' => 'foo*1'
- if (op == Token::ADD) {
- return factory->NewBinaryOperation(
- Token::MUL, expression, factory->NewNumberLiteral(1, pos), pos);
- }
- // The same idea for '-foo' => 'foo*(-1)'.
- if (op == Token::SUB) {
- return factory->NewBinaryOperation(
- Token::MUL, expression, factory->NewNumberLiteral(-1, pos), pos);
- }
- // ...and one more time for '~foo' => 'foo^(~0)'.
- if (op == Token::BIT_NOT) {
- return factory->NewBinaryOperation(
- Token::BIT_XOR, expression, factory->NewNumberLiteral(~0, pos), pos);
- }
- return factory->NewUnaryOperation(op, expression, pos);
-}
-
-
void ParserTraits::ReportMessageAt(Scanner::Location source_location,
const char* message,
Vector<const char*> args,
@@ -740,8 +688,8 @@ FunctionLiteral* ParserTraits::ParseFunctionLiteral(
}
-Expression* ParserTraits::ParsePostfixExpression(bool* ok) {
- return parser_->ParsePostfixExpression(ok);
+Expression* ParserTraits::ParseUnaryExpression(bool* ok) {
+ return parser_->ParseUnaryExpression(ok);
}
@@ -3042,6 +2990,111 @@ Statement* Parser::ParseForStatement(ZoneStringList* labels, bool* ok) {
}
+Expression* Parser::ParseUnaryExpression(bool* ok) {
+ // UnaryExpression ::
+ // PostfixExpression
+ // 'delete' UnaryExpression
+ // 'void' UnaryExpression
+ // 'typeof' UnaryExpression
+ // '++' UnaryExpression
+ // '--' UnaryExpression
+ // '+' UnaryExpression
+ // '-' UnaryExpression
+ // '~' UnaryExpression
+ // '!' UnaryExpression
+
+ Token::Value op = peek();
+ if (Token::IsUnaryOp(op)) {
+ op = Next();
+ int pos = position();
+ Expression* expression = ParseUnaryExpression(CHECK_OK);
+
+ if (expression != NULL && (expression->AsLiteral() != NULL)) {
+ Handle<Object> literal = expression->AsLiteral()->value();
+ if (op == Token::NOT) {
+ // Convert the literal to a boolean condition and negate it.
+ bool condition = literal->BooleanValue();
+ Handle<Object> result = isolate()->factory()->ToBoolean(!condition);
+ return factory()->NewLiteral(result, pos);
+ } else if (literal->IsNumber()) {
+ // Compute some expressions involving only number literals.
+ double value = literal->Number();
+ switch (op) {
+ case Token::ADD:
+ return expression;
+ case Token::SUB:
+ return factory()->NewNumberLiteral(-value, pos);
+ case Token::BIT_NOT:
+ return factory()->NewNumberLiteral(~DoubleToInt32(value), pos);
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // "delete identifier" is a syntax error in strict mode.
+ if (op == Token::DELETE && strict_mode() == STRICT) {
+ VariableProxy* operand = expression->AsVariableProxy();
+ if (operand != NULL && !operand->is_this()) {
+ ReportMessage("strict_delete", Vector<const char*>::empty());
+ *ok = false;
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Desugar '+foo' into 'foo*1', this enables the collection of type feedback
+ // without any special stub and the multiplication is removed later in
+ // Crankshaft's canonicalization pass.
+ if (op == Token::ADD) {
+ return factory()->NewBinaryOperation(Token::MUL,
+ expression,
+ factory()->NewNumberLiteral(1, pos),
+ pos);
+ }
+ // The same idea for '-foo' => 'foo*(-1)'.
+ if (op == Token::SUB) {
+ return factory()->NewBinaryOperation(Token::MUL,
+ expression,
+ factory()->NewNumberLiteral(-1, pos),
+ pos);
+ }
+ // ...and one more time for '~foo' => 'foo^(~0)'.
+ if (op == Token::BIT_NOT) {
+ return factory()->NewBinaryOperation(Token::BIT_XOR,
+ expression,
+ factory()->NewNumberLiteral(~0, pos),
+ pos);
+ }
+
+ return factory()->NewUnaryOperation(op, expression, pos);
+
+ } else if (Token::IsCountOp(op)) {
+ op = Next();
+ Scanner::Location lhs_location = scanner()->peek_location();
+ Expression* expression = ParseUnaryExpression(CHECK_OK);
+ if (expression == NULL || !expression->IsValidLeftHandSide()) {
+ ReportMessageAt(lhs_location, "invalid_lhs_in_prefix_op", true);
+ *ok = false;
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (strict_mode() == STRICT) {
+ // Prefix expression operand in strict mode may not be eval or arguments.
+ CheckStrictModeLValue(expression, CHECK_OK);
+ }
+ MarkExpressionAsLValue(expression);
+
+ return factory()->NewCountOperation(op,
+ true /* prefix */,
+ expression,
+ position());
+
+ } else {
+ return ParsePostfixExpression(ok);
+ }
+}
+
+
Expression* Parser::ParsePostfixExpression(bool* ok) {
// PostfixExpression ::
// LeftHandSideExpression ('++' | '--')?
« no previous file with comments | « src/parser.h ('k') | src/preparser.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698