Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(174)

Issues Search
    My Issues | Starred     Open | Closed | All

Unified Diff: LayoutTests/media/encrypted-media/encrypted-media-playback-multiple-sessions.html

Issue 203323006: Add layout test for EME WD using multiple sessions (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink.git@master
Patch Set: New test file Created 6 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « LayoutTests/media/content/test-encrypted-2-keys.webm ('k') | LayoutTests/media/encrypted-media/encrypted-media-playback-multiple-sessions-expected.txt » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: LayoutTests/media/encrypted-media/encrypted-media-playback-multiple-sessions.html
diff --git a/LayoutTests/media/encrypted-media/encrypted-media-playback-multiple-sessions.html b/LayoutTests/media/encrypted-media/encrypted-media-playback-multiple-sessions.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df4931bc148b1bb3fceb50a7646f32de8497b765
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LayoutTests/media/encrypted-media/encrypted-media-playback-multiple-sessions.html
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+ <head>
+ <title>Clear Key Playback with Multiple Sessions</title>
+ <script src="encrypted-media-utils.js"></script>
+ <script src="../w3c-media-utils.js"></script>
+ <script src="../../resources/testharness.js"></script>
+ <script src="../../resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>
+ </head>
+ <body>
+ <video id="testVideo"></video>
+ <div id="log"></div>
+ <p>Test playback of encrypted media using Clear Key key system with multiple sessions.</p>
+ <script>
+ // Timeout for all tests to run.
ddorwin 2014/03/21 06:00:20 It would be nice to have a single line for this ti
jrummell 2014/03/21 17:23:01 Done.
+ setup({ timeout: 60000 });
ddorwin 2014/03/21 06:00:20 Oh, maybe this is from other files that ran multip
jrummell 2014/03/21 17:23:01 The testharness has 2 timeouts -- 1 for the timeou
ddorwin 2014/03/21 17:36:49 :( Thanks for the explanation.
+
+ async_test(function(test)
+ {
+ var video = document.getElementById("testVideo");
+ var mediaKeys = new MediaKeys("org.w3.clearkey");
+ var audioMediaKeySession = null;
+ var videoMediaKeySession = null;
+ var audioSessionReadyReceived = false;
+ var videoSessionReadyReceived = false;
+
+ // The 2 streams use different key ids and different keys.
+ var audioKeyId = "1234567890123456";
+ var audioKey = new Uint8Array([0x30, 0x30, 0x62, 0xF1, 0x68, 0x14, 0xD2, 0x7B,
+ 0x68, 0xEF, 0x12, 0x2A, 0xFC, 0xE4, 0xAE, 0x0A]);
+ var videoKeyId = "0123456789012345";
+ var videoKey = new Uint8Array([0x7A, 0x7A, 0x62, 0xF1, 0x68, 0x14, 0xD2, 0x7B,
+ 0x68, 0xEF, 0x12, 0x2A, 0xFC, 0xE4, 0xAE, 0x0A]);
+
+ function onNeedKey(event)
+ {
+ assert_equals(event.target, video);
ddorwin 2014/03/21 06:00:20 We're not specifically testing the events, so we p
jrummell 2014/03/21 17:23:01 Sure. I just copied the regular playback test and
+ assert_true(event instanceof window.MediaKeyNeededEvent);
+ assert_equals(event.type, "needkey");
+
+ // Ideally we could just look at event.contentType, but it
ddorwin 2014/03/21 06:00:20 This comment is unnecessary - the spec says you ca
jrummell 2014/03/21 17:23:01 Done.
+ // is used to specify the encoding format, not the stream
+ // (and both streams are webm).
+ var keyId = String.fromCharCode.apply(null, event.initData);
+ if (keyId == videoKeyId) {
+ assert_equals(videoMediaKeySession, null);
+ videoMediaKeySession = mediaKeys.createSession(event.contentType, event.initData);
ddorwin 2014/03/21 06:00:20 nit: We could share a bit more code by creating th
jrummell 2014/03/21 17:23:01 Done.
+ waitForEventAndRunStep("message", videoMediaKeySession, onMessage, test);
+ } else {
+ assert_equals(keyId, audioKeyId);
+ assert_equals(audioMediaKeySession, null);
+ audioMediaKeySession = mediaKeys.createSession(event.contentType, event.initData);
+ waitForEventAndRunStep("message", audioMediaKeySession, onMessage, test);
+ }
+ }
+
+ function onMessage(event)
+ {
+ assert_true(event instanceof window.MediaKeyMessageEvent);
+ assert_equals(event.type, "message");
+ var keyId = event.message;
+
+ if (event.target == videoMediaKeySession) {
+ assert_equals(String.fromCharCode.apply(null, keyId), videoKeyId);
+ var jwkSet = stringToUint8Array(createJWKSet(createJWK(keyId, videoKey)));
+ videoMediaKeySession.update(jwkSet);
+ waitForEventAndRunStep("ready", videoMediaKeySession, onReady, test);
+ } else {
+ assert_equals(event.target, audioMediaKeySession);
+ assert_equals(String.fromCharCode.apply(null, keyId), audioKeyId);
+ var jwkSet = stringToUint8Array(createJWKSet(createJWK(keyId, audioKey)));
+ audioMediaKeySession.update(jwkSet);
+ waitForEventAndRunStep("ready", audioMediaKeySession, onReady, test);
+ }
+ }
+
+ function onReady(event)
+ {
+ assert_true(event instanceof window.Event);
+ assert_equals(event.type, "ready");
+ if (event.target == videoMediaKeySession) {
+ videoSessionReadyReceived = true;
+ } else {
+ assert_equals(event.target, audioMediaKeySession);
+ audioSessionReadyReceived = true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ function onPlaying(event)
ddorwin 2014/03/21 06:00:20 OOC, could we just register the timeupdate event d
jrummell 2014/03/21 17:23:01 I'm not sure it makes any difference. We still wan
ddorwin 2014/03/21 17:36:49 Do we really not get a playing event until the key
jrummell 2014/03/21 18:03:59 Test that Ready received for both audio and video
+ {
+ // Not using waitForEventAndRunStep() to avoid too many EVENT(onTimeUpdate) logs.
+ video.addEventListener("timeupdate", onTimeUpdate, true);
+ }
+
+ function onTimeUpdate(event)
+ {
+ if (!audioSessionReadyReceived || !videoSessionReadyReceived)
+ return;
+ if (event.target.currentTime < 0.2)
ddorwin 2014/03/21 06:00:20 FYI: I think this only works as a test if the play
jrummell 2014/03/21 17:23:01 If I remove either of the update() calls in onMess
ddorwin 2014/03/21 17:36:49 Okay. We should have a test like this when we star
jrummell 2014/03/21 18:03:59 Done.
+ return;
+
+ test.done();
+ }
+
+ waitForEventAndRunStep("needkey", video, onNeedKey, test);
+ waitForEventAndRunStep("playing", video, onPlaying, test);
+
+ video.src = "../content/test-encrypted-2-keys.webm";
ddorwin 2014/03/21 06:00:20 nit: We should name it different-av-keys or someth
jrummell 2014/03/21 17:23:01 Done.
+ video.setMediaKeys(mediaKeys);
+ video.play();
+ }, "Playback using Clear Key key system with multiple sessions.",
+ { timeout: 60000 });
+ </script>
+ </body>
+</html>
« no previous file with comments | « LayoutTests/media/content/test-encrypted-2-keys.webm ('k') | LayoutTests/media/encrypted-media/encrypted-media-playback-multiple-sessions-expected.txt » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698