Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(104)

Unified Diff: third_party/WebKit/Source/bindings/core/v8/ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder.cpp

Issue 2029923003: Recursively defining custom elements should not lead to redefinition (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/bindings/core/v8/ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder.cpp
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/bindings/core/v8/ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/bindings/core/v8/ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder.cpp
index 39da9922a20331c868b3889186b2f20796ec9a0a..3b7fa34a6f59ad09df8b6e5f1a935f8cfc7fa108 100644
--- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/bindings/core/v8/ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder.cpp
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/bindings/core/v8/ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder.cpp
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
#include "bindings/core/v8/ScriptValue.h"
#include "bindings/core/v8/V8Binding.h"
#include "bindings/core/v8/V8BindingMacros.h"
+#include "bindings/core/v8/V8CustomElementsRegistry.h"
+#include "bindings/core/v8/V8PrivateProperty.h"
#include "core/dom/ExceptionCode.h"
namespace blink {
@@ -24,9 +26,20 @@ ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder::ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder(
, m_registry(registry)
, m_constructorValue(constructor.v8Value())
, m_exceptionState(exceptionState)
+ , m_didStartDefiningConstructor(false)
{
}
+ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder::~ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder()
+{
+ if (m_didStartDefiningConstructor) {
+ bool didDelete = v8CallOrCrash(constructorsBeingDefined()->Delete(
+ m_scriptState->context(),
+ m_constructor));
+ CHECK(didDelete);
+ }
+}
+
bool ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder::checkConstructorIntrinsics()
{
DCHECK(m_scriptState->world().isMainWorld());
@@ -46,6 +59,7 @@ bool ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder::checkConstructorIntrinsics()
bool ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder::checkConstructorNotRegistered()
{
+ // Check existing constructors
if (ScriptCustomElementDefinition::forConstructor(
m_scriptState.get(),
m_registry,
@@ -57,6 +71,18 @@ bool ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder::checkConstructorNotRegistered()
"this constructor has already been used with this registry");
return false;
}
+
+ // Check constructors that are being processed by builders right now.
+ v8::Local<v8::Set> constructors = constructorsBeingDefined();
+ if (v8CallOrCrash(
haraken 2016/06/02 02:29:36 Would you help me understand why it's not enough t
+ constructors->Has(m_scriptState->context(), m_constructor))) {
+ m_exceptionState.throwDOMException(
+ NotSupportedError,
+ "this constructor is already being defined in this registry");
+ return false;
+ }
+ m_didStartDefiningConstructor = true;
+ v8CallOrCrash(constructors->Add(m_scriptState->context(), m_constructor));
return true;
}
@@ -93,4 +119,20 @@ CustomElementDefinition* ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder::build(
m_prototype);
}
+v8::Local<v8::Set> ScriptCustomElementDefinitionBuilder
+ ::constructorsBeingDefined()
+{
+ V8PrivateProperty::Symbol symbol =
+ V8PrivateProperty::getCustomElementsRegistryConstructorsBeingDefined(
+ m_scriptState->isolate());
+ v8::Local<v8::Object> wrapper =
+ toV8(m_registry.get(), m_scriptState.get()).As<v8::Object>();
+ v8::Local<v8::Value> set = symbol.get(m_scriptState->context(), wrapper);
+ if (set.IsEmpty()) {
+ set = v8::Set::New(m_scriptState->isolate());
+ symbol.set(m_scriptState->context(), wrapper, set);
+ }
+ return set.As<v8::Set>();
+}
+
} // namespace blink

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698