samples/pop-pop-win/license.txt - Issue 200723008: samples/poppopwin: upgrade to first-class sample

Side by Side Diff: samples/pop-pop-win/license.txt

Issue 200723008: samples/poppopwin: upgrade to first-class sample (Closed) Base URL: https://dart.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/dart

Patch Set: Created 6 years, 9 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log

OLD	NEW
1 Copyright (c) 2012, Pop, Pop, Win! authors	1 Copyright (c) 2012, Pop, Pop, Win! authors

2	2

3 Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");	3 Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");

4 you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.	4 you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.

5 You may obtain a copy of the License at	5 You may obtain a copy of the License at

6	6

7 http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0	7 http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Jennifer Messerly 2014/03/19 01:06:54 So, this isn't under the same LICENSE as the rest So, this isn't under the same LICENSE as the rest of the Dart project (which is BSD) my understanding is: it should be placed under samples/third_party/... For example, both "samples/third_party/todomvc" and "pkg/third_party/html5lib" are developed in Dart SVN. But they are under "third_party" because of the different license. (hmm, although looking at TodoMVC now, it uses identical license to Dart SDK, so maybe we could move it up a level. Our old version used to be under a different license) kevmoo 2014/03/19 03:24:06 Nuking the license file. Show quoted text On 2014/03/19 01:06:54, John Messerly wrote: > So, this isn't under the same LICENSE as the rest of the Dart project (which is > BSD) > my understanding is: it should be placed under samples/third_party/... > > For example, both "samples/third_party/todomvc" and "pkg/third_party/html5lib" > are developed in Dart SVN. But they are under "third_party" because of the > different license. > > (hmm, although looking at TodoMVC now, it uses identical license to Dart SDK, so > maybe we could move it up a level. Our old version used to be under a different > license) Nuking the license file. Jennifer Messerly 2014/03/19 14:26:43 Nice. Yeah, since you wrote pop-pop-win it's your Show quoted text On 2014/03/19 03:24:06, kevmoo wrote: > On 2014/03/19 01:06:54, John Messerly wrote: > > So, this isn't under the same LICENSE as the rest of the Dart project (which > is > > BSD) > > my understanding is: it should be placed under samples/third_party/... > > > > For example, both "samples/third_party/todomvc" and "pkg/third_party/html5lib" > > are developed in Dart SVN. But they are under "third_party" because of the > > different license. > > > > (hmm, although looking at TodoMVC now, it uses identical license to Dart SDK, > so > > maybe we could move it up a level. Our old version used to be under a > different > > license) > > Nuking the license file. Nice. Yeah, since you wrote pop-pop-win it's your call. +1 for having same license as everything else :)
8	8

9 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software	9 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software

10 distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,	10 distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,

11 WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.	11 WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.

12 See the License for the specific language governing permissions and	12 See the License for the specific language governing permissions and

13 limitations under the License.	13 limitations under the License.

OLD	NEW

« samples/pop-pop-win/.gitignore ('K') | « samples/pop-pop-win/lib/src/poppopwin/square_state.dart ('k') | samples/pop-pop-win/pubspec.yaml » ('j') | samples/pop-pop-win/pubspec.yaml » ('J')