[interpreter] Address naming inconsistencies in bytecodes.

test/unittests/interpreter/bytecode-pipeline-unittest.cc

Index: test/unittests/interpreter/bytecode-pipeline-unittest.cc
diff --git a/test/unittests/interpreter/bytecode-pipeline-unittest.cc b/test/unittests/interpreter/bytecode-pipeline-unittest.cc
index f12391c454422d25019a6a6fef9b51bddd799416..5e070493c98233e43519f1e6df040c7efe1c6561 100644
--- a/test/unittests/interpreter/bytecode-pipeline-unittest.cc
+++ b/test/unittests/interpreter/bytecode-pipeline-unittest.cc
@@ -92,10 +92,10 @@ TEST_F(BytecodeNodeTest, Constructor3) {
 
 TEST_F(BytecodeNodeTest, Constructor4) {
   uint32_t operands[] = {0x11, 0x22, 0x33};
-  BytecodeNode node(Bytecode::kLoadIC, operands[0], operands[1], operands[2],
-                    OperandScale::kSingle);
+  BytecodeNode node(Bytecode::kLdaNamedProperty, operands[0], operands[1],
+                    operands[2], OperandScale::kSingle);
   CHECK_EQ(node.operand_count(), 3);
-  CHECK_EQ(node.bytecode(), Bytecode::kLoadIC);
+  CHECK_EQ(node.bytecode(), Bytecode::kLdaNamedProperty);
   CHECK_EQ(node.operand(0), operands[0]);
   CHECK_EQ(node.operand(1), operands[1]);
   CHECK_EQ(node.operand(2), operands[2]);