| Index: Source/core/dom/TreeScopeStyleSheetCollection.cpp
|
| diff --git a/Source/core/dom/TreeScopeStyleSheetCollection.cpp b/Source/core/dom/TreeScopeStyleSheetCollection.cpp
|
| index 2daa165837f48cc0f4e43ed7c576c2826ade9694..79a26548cd28052faeeef7a5f6012c0d7183ecc1 100644
|
| --- a/Source/core/dom/TreeScopeStyleSheetCollection.cpp
|
| +++ b/Source/core/dom/TreeScopeStyleSheetCollection.cpp
|
| @@ -28,9 +28,9 @@
|
| #include "core/dom/TreeScopeStyleSheetCollection.h"
|
|
|
| #include "core/css/CSSStyleSheet.h"
|
| -#include "core/css/StyleInvalidationAnalysis.h"
|
| #include "core/css/StyleRuleImport.h"
|
| #include "core/css/StyleSheetContents.h"
|
| +#include "core/css/invalidation/StyleSheetInvalidationAnalysis.h"
|
| #include "core/css/resolver/StyleResolver.h"
|
| #include "core/dom/Element.h"
|
| #include "core/dom/StyleEngine.h"
|
| @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void TreeScopeStyleSheetCollection::analyzeStyleSheetChange(StyleResolverUpdateM
|
| }
|
|
|
| // FIXME: If styleResolverUpdateType is Reconstruct, we should return early here since
|
| - // we need to recalc the whole document. It's wrong to use StyleInvalidationAnalysis since
|
| + // we need to recalc the whole document. It's wrong to use StyleSheetInvalidationAnalysis since
|
| // it only looks at the addedSheets.
|
|
|
| // No point in doing the analysis work if we're just going to recalc the whole document anyways.
|
| @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ void TreeScopeStyleSheetCollection::analyzeStyleSheetChange(StyleResolverUpdateM
|
| // If we are already parsing the body and so may have significant amount of elements, put some effort into trying to avoid style recalcs.
|
| if (!document().body() || document().hasNodesWithPlaceholderStyle())
|
| return;
|
| - StyleInvalidationAnalysis invalidationAnalysis(addedSheets);
|
| + StyleSheetInvalidationAnalysis invalidationAnalysis(addedSheets);
|
| if (invalidationAnalysis.dirtiesAllStyle())
|
| return;
|
| invalidationAnalysis.invalidateStyle(document());
|
|
|