Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(310)

Unified Diff: src/unwinding-info.cc

Issue 1993653003: Initial support for emitting unwinding information in perf jitdump. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git@master
Patch Set: Rebase. Created 4 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« src/unwinding-info.h ('K') | « src/unwinding-info.h ('k') | src/v8.gyp » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: src/unwinding-info.cc
diff --git a/src/unwinding-info.cc b/src/unwinding-info.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..25cfac6363ffc65c6be77f3995129e84945dc853
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/unwinding-info.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+// Copyright 2016 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "src/unwinding-info.h"
+#include "src/objects-inl.h"
+#include "src/objects.h"
+
+namespace v8 {
+namespace internal {
+
+static const int DW_EH_PE_pcrel = 0x10;
+static const int DW_EH_PE_datarel = 0x30;
+static const int DW_EH_PE_udata4 = 0x03;
+static const int DW_EH_PE_sdata4 = 0x0b;
+
+static const int kSizeOfCIE = 0;
+
+EhFrameHdr::EhFrameHdr(Code* code) {
rmcilroy 2016/06/21 13:47:44 Can we have a test (cctest or unittest) for this c
Stefano Sanfilippo 2016/06/23 15:23:44 Done. I wrote a cctest because we need to pass thr
+ int code_size = code->is_crankshafted() ? code->safepoint_table_offset()
+ : code->instruction_size();
+ version_ = 1;
+ eh_frame_ptr_encoding_ = DW_EH_PE_sdata4 | DW_EH_PE_pcrel;
+ lut_size_encoding_ = DW_EH_PE_udata4;
+ lut_entries_encoding_ = DW_EH_PE_sdata4 | DW_EH_PE_datarel;
+
+ // .eh_frame pointer and LUT
+ if (code->has_unwinding_info()) {
+ DCHECK_GE(code->unwinding_info_size(), EhFrameHdr::kRecordSize);
+ int eh_frame_size = code->unwinding_info_size() - EhFrameHdr::kRecordSize;
+
+ offset_to_eh_frame_ = -(eh_frame_size + 4);
+ lut_entries_number_ = 1;
+ offset_to_procedure_ = -(RoundUp(code_size, 8) + eh_frame_size);
+ offset_to_fde_ = -(eh_frame_size - static_cast<int>(kSizeOfCIE));
+ } else {
+ // Create a dummy table
+ offset_to_eh_frame_ = 0;
+ lut_entries_number_ = 0;
+ offset_to_procedure_ = 0;
+ offset_to_fde_ = 0;
+ }
+}
+
+void PatchProcedureBoundariesInEhFrame(Code* code) {
rmcilroy 2016/06/21 13:47:44 As mentioned above, please remove this from this C
Stefano Sanfilippo 2016/06/23 15:23:44 Removed. The issue was that in some circumstances
+ int boundaries_base_offset = kSizeOfCIE + 8;
+ int32_t code_size = code->is_crankshafted() ? code->safepoint_table_offset()
+ : code->instruction_size();
+ int32_t offset_to_text = -(RoundUp(code_size, 8) + boundaries_base_offset);
+
+ MemMove(code->unwinding_info_start() + boundaries_base_offset,
+ &offset_to_text, sizeof(offset_to_text));
+ MemMove(code->unwinding_info_start() + boundaries_base_offset +
+ sizeof(offset_to_text),
+ &code_size, sizeof(code_size));
+}
+
+} // namespace internal
+} // namespace v8
« src/unwinding-info.h ('K') | « src/unwinding-info.h ('k') | src/v8.gyp » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698