LayoutTests/TestExpectations - Issue 19885002: WebCrypto: Add interfaces for importKey().

Side by Side Diff

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Side by Side Diff: LayoutTests/TestExpectations

Issue 19885002: WebCrypto: Add interfaces for importKey(). (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/blink/trunk

Patch Set: Move test stuff into MockWebCrypto Created 7 years, 5 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log

« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | LayoutTests/crypto/importKey.html » ('j') | Source/modules/crypto/Key.cpp » ('J')

OLD	NEW
1 # See http://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests/testexpecta tions for more information on this file.	1 # See http://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests/testexpecta tions for more information on this file.

2	2

3 # -----------------------------------------------------------------	3 # -----------------------------------------------------------------

4 # SLOW BUT PASSING	4 # SLOW BUT PASSING

5 # -----------------------------------------------------------------	5 # -----------------------------------------------------------------

6	6

7 crbug.com/237000 virtual/gpu/fast/canvas/getPutImageDataPairTest.html [ Slow ]	7 crbug.com/237000 virtual/gpu/fast/canvas/getPutImageDataPairTest.html [ Slow ]

8 webkit.org/b/82097 [ Debug ] editing/selection/move-by-word-visually-crash-test- 5.html [ Slow ]	8 webkit.org/b/82097 [ Debug ] editing/selection/move-by-word-visually-crash-test- 5.html [ Slow ]

9 crbug.com/24182 [ Debug ] fast/css/large-list-of-rules-crash.html [ Slow ]	9 crbug.com/24182 [ Debug ] fast/css/large-list-of-rules-crash.html [ Slow ]

10 crbug.com/24182 [ Debug ] fast/dom/shadow/tree-scope-crash.html [ Slow ]	10 crbug.com/24182 [ Debug ] fast/dom/shadow/tree-scope-crash.html [ Slow ]

(...skipping 1706 matching lines...) Expand 10 before \| Expand all \| Expand 10 after Loading...
1717	1717

1718 Bug(cbiesinger) [ Win ] fast/forms/button-default-title.html [ Failure ]	1718 Bug(cbiesinger) [ Win ] fast/forms/button-default-title.html [ Failure ]

1719	1719

1720 crbug.com/257325 [ Mac ] media/audio-repaint.html [ Pass ImageOnlyFailure ]	1720 crbug.com/257325 [ Mac ] media/audio-repaint.html [ Pass ImageOnlyFailure ]

1721	1721

1722 crbug.com/255407 plugins/npruntime/leak-window-scriptable-object.html [ Pass Fai lure ]	1722 crbug.com/255407 plugins/npruntime/leak-window-scriptable-object.html [ Pass Fai lure ]

1723	1723

1724 # started timing out around r154246..r154251	1724 # started timing out around r154246..r154251

1725 crbug.com/260744 [ Debug ] fast/js/regress/function-dot-apply.html [ Timeout ]	1725 crbug.com/260744 [ Debug ] fast/js/regress/function-dot-apply.html [ Timeout ]

1726 crbug.com/260744 [ Debug ] fast/js/regress/inline-arguments-local-escape.html [ Timeout ]	1726 crbug.com/260744 [ Debug ] fast/js/regress/inline-arguments-local-escape.html [ Timeout ]

	1727

	1728 # Part of a 2-sided patch; re-enabled immediately after chromium side lands.

	1729 Bug(eroman) crypto/ [ Skip ]
	eroman 2013/07/23 01:38:22 This seems wrong. Perhaps it is better if after th This seems wrong. Perhaps it is better if after this is reviewed, I split it up for a 3-sided patch which does not require disabling any tests. abarth-chromium 2013/07/23 06:22:07 I think it's fine. You're the only one working in Show quoted text On 2013/07/23 01:38:22, eroman wrote: > This seems wrong. Perhaps it is better if after this is reviewed, I split it up > for a 3-sided patch which does not require disabling any tests. I think it's fine. You're the only one working in this area. We're unlikely to get into too much trouble if these tests are disabled for a bit.
OLD	NEW