Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(247)

Unified Diff: blimp/client/feature/compositor/blimp_client_picture_cache.cc

Issue 1982893002: [blimp] Add SkPicture caching support. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: git merge origin/master Created 4 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: blimp/client/feature/compositor/blimp_client_picture_cache.cc
diff --git a/blimp/client/feature/compositor/blimp_client_picture_cache.cc b/blimp/client/feature/compositor/blimp_client_picture_cache.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb3f615fd3e91b5af033d7e046630cccd719d523
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blimp/client/feature/compositor/blimp_client_picture_cache.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "blimp/client/feature/compositor/blimp_client_picture_cache.h"
+
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <map>
+#include <memory>
+#include <vector>
+
+#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "blimp/common/compositor/blimp_picture_cache_registry.h"
+#include "cc/proto/picture_cache.h"
+#include "third_party/skia/include/core/SkPicture.h"
+#include "third_party/skia/include/core/SkRefCnt.h"
+#include "third_party/skia/include/core/SkStream.h"
+
+namespace blimp {
+namespace client {
+
+namespace {
+// Helper function to deserialize the content of |picture_data| into an
+// SkPicture.
+sk_sp<SkPicture> DeserializePicture(
+ SkPicture::InstallPixelRefProc pixel_deserializer,
+ const cc::PictureData& picture_data) {
+ SkMemoryStream stream(picture_data.data);
+ return SkPicture::MakeFromStream(&stream, pixel_deserializer);
+}
+
+} // namespace
+
+BlimpClientPictureCache::BlimpClientPictureCache(
+ SkPicture::InstallPixelRefProc pixel_deserializer)
+ : pixel_deserializer_(pixel_deserializer) {}
+
+BlimpClientPictureCache::~BlimpClientPictureCache() {}
vmpstr 2016/06/01 00:10:56 nit: = default
nyquist 2016/06/04 00:24:57 Done.
+
+sk_sp<const SkPicture> BlimpClientPictureCache::GetPicture(
+ uint32_t engine_picture_id) {
+ DCHECK(pictures_.find(engine_picture_id) != pictures_.end());
+ return pictures_.find(engine_picture_id)->second;
vmpstr 2016/06/01 00:10:56 return pictures_[engine_picture_id];
nyquist 2016/06/04 00:24:57 Done.
+}
+
+void BlimpClientPictureCache::ApplyCacheUpdate(
+ const cc::PictureCacheUpdate& cache_update) {
+ for (const cc::PictureData& picture_data : cache_update) {
+ sk_sp<SkPicture> deserialized_picture =
vmpstr 2016/06/01 00:10:56 I think we need to be a bit more consistent with c
nyquist 2016/06/04 00:24:57 Done.
+ DeserializePicture(pixel_deserializer_, picture_data);
+ DCHECK(pictures_.find(picture_data.unique_id) == pictures_.end());
+ pictures_.insert(
+ std::make_pair(picture_data.unique_id, deserialized_picture));
vmpstr 2016/06/01 00:10:56 I think pictures_.emplace(picture_data.unique_id,
nyquist 2016/06/04 00:24:57 Does this look OK?
+#if DCHECK_IS_ON()
+ last_added_.insert(picture_data.unique_id);
+#endif
+ }
+}
+
+void BlimpClientPictureCache::Flush() {
+ std::vector<uint32_t> added;
+ std::vector<uint32_t> removed;
+ registry_.Commit(&added, &removed);
+
+#if DCHECK_IS_ON()
+ // Verify that the incoming cache update matches the new items.
+ DCHECK_EQ(added.size(), last_added_.size());
+ DCHECK(std::set<uint32_t>(added.begin(), added.end()) == last_added_);
+ last_added_.clear();
+#endif
+
+ for (const auto& it : removed) {
+ auto entry = pictures_.find(it);
+ if (entry == pictures_.end()) {
+ NOTREACHED() << "PictureMap does not contain entry " << it;
vmpstr 2016/06/01 00:10:56 Can this if be a DCHECK instead? If not, can you a
nyquist 2016/06/04 00:24:57 Done.
+ continue;
+ }
+ pictures_.erase(entry);
+ }
+}
+
+void BlimpClientPictureCache::MarkPictureForUnregistration(
+ uint32_t engine_picture_id) {
+ registry_.DecrementRefCount(engine_picture_id);
+}
+
+void BlimpClientPictureCache::MarkPictureForRegistration(
+ uint32_t engine_picture_id) {
+ registry_.IncrementRefCount(engine_picture_id);
+}
+
+} // namespace client
+} // namespace blimp

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698