Track thread activities in order to diagnose hangs.

base/debug/activity_analyzer_unittest.cc

+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "base/debug/activity_analyzer.h"
+
+#include <memory>
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/files/file.h"
+#include "base/files/file_util.h"
+#include "base/files/memory_mapped_file.h"
+#include "base/files/scoped_temp_dir.h"
+#include "base/memory/ptr_util.h"
+#include "base/pending_task.h"
+#include "base/process/process.h"
+#include "base/synchronization/condition_variable.h"
+#include "base/synchronization/lock.h"
+#include "base/synchronization/spin_wait.h"
+#include "base/threading/platform_thread.h"
+#include "base/threading/simple_thread.h"
+#include "base/time/time.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace base {
+namespace debug {
+
+namespace {
+
+class TestActivityTracker : public ThreadActivityTracker {
+ public:
+  TestActivityTracker(std::unique_ptr<char[]> memory, size_t mem_size)
+      : ThreadActivityTracker(memset(memory.get(), 0, mem_size), mem_size),
+        mem_segment_(std::move(memory)) {}
+
+  ~TestActivityTracker() override {}
+
+ private:
+  std::unique_ptr<char[]> mem_segment_;
+};
+
+}  // namespace
+
+
+class ActivityAnalyzerTest : public testing::Test {
+ public:
+  const int kMemorySize = 1 << 10;  // 1KiB

[Sigurður Ásgeirsson, 2016/06/14 15:28:13]

static?

[bcwhite, 2016/06/14 19:48:45]

In general it doesn't matter since the compiler will optimize it out given that
it's memory address is never taken.

The use of "static" beyond that is controversial as though a static will
initialize only once, it requires a flag and code to ensure it happens only
once.  For simple data types, it's generally faster to always do direct store of
the constant data every time that test a flag and skip.

+  const int kStackSize  = 256;
+
+  using Activity = ThreadActivityAnalyzer::Activity;
+
+  ActivityAnalyzerTest() {}
+
+  ~ActivityAnalyzerTest() override {
+    GlobalActivityTracker* global_tracker = GlobalActivityTracker::Get();
+    if (global_tracker) {
+      global_tracker->ReleaseTrackerForCurrentThreadForTesting();
+      delete global_tracker;
+    }
+  }
+
+  std::unique_ptr<ThreadActivityTracker> CreateActivityTracker() {
+    std::unique_ptr<char[]> memory(new char[kStackSize]);
+    return WrapUnique(new TestActivityTracker(std::move(memory), kStackSize));
+  }
+
+  static void DoNothing() {}
+};
+
+TEST_F(ActivityAnalyzerTest, ThreadAnalyzerConstruction) {
+  std::unique_ptr<ThreadActivityTracker> tracker = CreateActivityTracker();
+  {
+    ThreadActivityAnalyzer analyzer(tracker.get());
+    EXPECT_TRUE(analyzer.IsValid());
+    EXPECT_EQ(PlatformThread::GetName(), analyzer.GetThreadName());
+  }
+
+  // TODO(bcwhite): More tests.

[Sigurður Ásgeirsson, 2016/06/14 15:28:13]

Are there already cross-process tests?

[bcwhite, 2016/06/14 19:48:45]

No but in practice it doesn't matter since there are not static members in the
class.  Thus, separate threads in the same process can simulate the same
conditions.

+}
+
+TEST_F(ActivityAnalyzerTest, GlobalAnalyzerConstruction) {
+  GlobalActivityTracker::CreateWithLocalMemory(kMemorySize, 0, "", 3);
+  // ThreadActivityTracker* tracker =
+  //     GlobalActivityTracker::Get()->GetOrCreateTrackerForCurrentThread();
+
+  PersistentMemoryAllocator* allocator =
+      GlobalActivityTracker::Get()->allocator();
+  GlobalActivityAnalyzer analyzer(WrapUnique(
+      new PersistentMemoryAllocator(const_cast<void*>(allocator->data()),
+                                    allocator->size(), 0, 0, "", true)));
+
+  // The only thread is the test thread.
+  ThreadActivityAnalyzer* ta1 = analyzer.GetFirstAnalyzer();

[Sigurður Ásgeirsson, 2016/06/14 15:28:13]

I'm not sure this is a safe assumption, given the way we (used to) run tests -
if your tests rely on process-global state, they may need configuration or some
form of exclusion.

[bcwhite, 2016/06/14 19:48:45]

I'll look into it.

+  ASSERT_TRUE(ta1);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(analyzer.GetNextAnalyzer());
+  EXPECT_EQ(ta1, analyzer.GetAnalyzerForThread(ta1->GetThreadKey()));
+}
+
+}  // namespace debug
+}  // namespace base