Chromium Code Reviews| Index: net/cookies/cookie_monster.cc |
| diff --git a/net/cookies/cookie_monster.cc b/net/cookies/cookie_monster.cc |
| index 3d7124d502e698622056a685b7314a562623af6a..c6715e0b4c4863d0f34809e7195bfd2f9146560b 100644 |
| --- a/net/cookies/cookie_monster.cc |
| +++ b/net/cookies/cookie_monster.cc |
| @@ -309,53 +309,29 @@ void RunAsync(scoped_refptr<base::TaskRunner> proxy, |
| proxy->PostTask(FROM_HERE, base::Bind(callback, cookie, removed)); |
| } |
| -size_t CountProtectedSecureCookiesAtPriority( |
| - CookiePriority priority, |
| - CookieMonster::CookieItVector* cookies) { |
| - size_t num_protected_secure_cookies = 0; |
| - for (const auto& cookie : *cookies) { |
| - if (!cookie->second->IsSecure()) |
| - continue; |
| - // 1) At low-priority, only low-priority secure cookies are protected as |
| - // part of the quota. |
| - // 2) At medium-priority, only medium-priority secure cookies are protected |
| - // as part of the quota (low-priority secure cookies may be deleted). |
| - // 3) At high-priority, medium-priority and high-priority secure cookies are |
| - // protected as part of the quota (low-priority secure cookies may be |
| - // deleted). |
| - CookiePriority cookie_priority = cookie->second->Priority(); |
| - switch (cookie_priority) { |
| - case COOKIE_PRIORITY_LOW: |
| - if (priority == COOKIE_PRIORITY_LOW) |
| - num_protected_secure_cookies++; |
| - break; |
| - case COOKIE_PRIORITY_MEDIUM: |
| - case COOKIE_PRIORITY_HIGH: |
| - if (cookie_priority <= priority) |
| - num_protected_secure_cookies++; |
| - break; |
| - } |
| - } |
| - |
| - return num_protected_secure_cookies; |
| -} |
| - |
| bool IsCookieEligibleForEviction(CookiePriority current_priority_level, |
| bool protect_secure_cookies, |
| const CanonicalCookie* cookie) { |
| - if (!cookie->IsSecure() || !protect_secure_cookies) |
| - return cookie->Priority() <= current_priority_level; |
| - |
| - // Special consideration has to be given for low-priority secure cookies since |
| - // they are given lower prority than non-secure medium-priority and non-secure |
| - // high-priority cookies. Thus, low-priority secure cookies may be evicted at |
| - // a medium and high value of |current_priority_level|. Put another way, |
| - // low-priority secure cookies are only protected when the current priority |
| - // level is low. |
| - if (current_priority_level == COOKIE_PRIORITY_LOW) |
| - return false; |
| + if (cookie->Priority() == current_priority_level && protect_secure_cookies) |
| + return !cookie->IsSecure(); |
| - return cookie->Priority() == COOKIE_PRIORITY_LOW; |
| + return cookie->Priority() == current_priority_level; |
| +} |
| + |
| +size_t CountCookiesForPossibleDeletion( |
| + CookiePriority priority, |
| + const CookieMonster::CookieItVector* cookies, |
| + bool protect_secure_cookies = false) { |
|
jww
2016/05/26 03:46:39
Please do not use a default argument here; it caus
maksims (do not use this acc)
2016/05/26 11:30:20
Done.
|
| + size_t cookies_count = 0U; |
| + for (const auto& cookie : *cookies) { |
| + if (cookie->second->Priority() == priority && !protect_secure_cookies) |
|
jww
2016/05/26 03:46:39
Please simplify this conditional. I'm finding the
maksims (do not use this acc)
2016/05/26 11:30:20
Then it will be incorrect if I will pass original
|
| + cookies_count++; |
| + else if (cookie->second->Priority() == priority && protect_secure_cookies && |
| + cookie->second->IsSecure()) { |
| + cookies_count++; |
| + } |
| + } |
| + return cookies_count; |
| } |
| } // namespace |
| @@ -1928,10 +1904,6 @@ size_t CookieMonster::GarbageCollect(const Time& current, |
| // Sort the cookies by access date, from least-recent to most-recent. |
| std::sort(cookie_its->begin(), cookie_its->end(), LRACookieSorter); |
| - size_t additional_quota_low = kDomainCookiesQuotaLow; |
| - size_t additional_quota_medium = kDomainCookiesQuotaMedium; |
| - size_t additional_quota_high = kDomainCookiesQuotaHigh; |
| - |
| // Remove all but the kDomainCookiesQuotaLow most-recently accessed |
| // cookies with low-priority. Then, if cookies still need to be removed, |
| // bump the quota and remove low- and medium-priority. Then, if cookies |
| @@ -1973,22 +1945,18 @@ size_t CookieMonster::GarbageCollect(const Time& current, |
| // necesary to delay quota adjustments until a later round. This is |
| // because if the high priority, non-secure round is skipped, its quota |
| // should not count until the later high priority, full round later. |
| - size_t* additional_quota = nullptr; |
| switch (purge_round.priority) { |
| case COOKIE_PRIORITY_LOW: |
| - additional_quota = &additional_quota_low; |
| + quota = kDomainCookiesQuotaLow; |
| break; |
| case COOKIE_PRIORITY_MEDIUM: |
| - additional_quota = &additional_quota_medium; |
| + quota = kDomainCookiesQuotaMedium; |
| break; |
| case COOKIE_PRIORITY_HIGH: |
| - additional_quota = &additional_quota_high; |
| + quota = kDomainCookiesQuotaHigh; |
| break; |
| } |
| - quota += *additional_quota; |
| - *additional_quota = 0u; |
| size_t just_deleted = 0u; |
| - |
| // Purge up to |purge_goal| for all cookies at the given priority. This |
| // path will always execute if strict secure cookies is disabled since |
| // |purge_goal| must be positive because of the for-loop guard. If |
| @@ -2058,45 +2026,45 @@ size_t CookieMonster::PurgeLeastRecentMatches(CookieItVector* cookies, |
| bool protect_secure_cookies) { |
| DCHECK(thread_checker_.CalledOnValidThread()); |
| - // Find the first protected cookie by walking down from the end of the list |
| - // cookie list (most-recently accessed) until |to_protect| cookies that match |
| - // |priority| are found. |
| - // |
| - // If |protect_secure_cookies| is true, do a first pass that counts eligible |
| - // secure cookies at the specified priority as protected. |
| - if (protect_secure_cookies) { |
| - to_protect -= std::min( |
| - to_protect, CountProtectedSecureCookiesAtPriority(priority, cookies)); |
| - } |
| + // 1. Count number of the cookies at |priority| |
| + size_t cookies_count_possibly_to_be_deleted = |
| + CountCookiesForPossibleDeletion(priority, cookies); |
| + |
| + // 2. If |cookies_count| at |priority| is less than or equal to_protect, skip. |
| + // This involves secure and non-secure cookies at |priority|. |
| + if (cookies_count_possibly_to_be_deleted <= to_protect) |
| + return 0u; |
| - size_t protection_boundary = cookies->size(); |
| - while (to_protect > 0 && protection_boundary > 0) { |
| - protection_boundary--; |
| - if (cookies->at(protection_boundary)->second->Priority() <= priority) |
| - to_protect--; |
| + // 3. Calculate number of secure cookies at |priority| |
| + // and Count number of cookies at |priority| that can possibly be deleted. |
| + // It is guaranteed we do not delete more than |purge_goal| even if |
| + // |priority_cookies_might_be_deleted| is higher. |
| + size_t secure_cookies = 0u; |
| + if (protect_secure_cookies) { |
| + secure_cookies = CountCookiesForPossibleDeletion(priority, cookies, |
| + protect_secure_cookies); |
| + cookies_count_possibly_to_be_deleted -= secure_cookies; |
| + } else { |
| + cookies_count_possibly_to_be_deleted -= to_protect; |
| } |
| - // Now, walk up from the beginning of the list (least-recently accessed) until |
| - // |purge_goal| cookies are removed, or the iterator hits |
| - // |protection_boundary|. |
| - size_t removed = 0; |
| - size_t current = 0; |
| - while (removed < purge_goal && current < protection_boundary) { |
| + size_t removed = 0u; |
| + size_t current = 0u; |
| + while ((removed < purge_goal && current < cookies->size()) && |
| + cookies_count_possibly_to_be_deleted > 0) { |
| const CanonicalCookie* current_cookie = cookies->at(current)->second; |
| - // Only delete the current cookie if the priority is less than or equal to |
| - // the current level. If it is equal to the current level, and secure |
| - // cookies are protected, only delete it if it is not secure. |
| + // Only delete the current cookie if the priority is equal to |
| + // the current level. |
| if (IsCookieEligibleForEviction(priority, protect_secure_cookies, |
| current_cookie)) { |
| InternalDeleteCookie(cookies->at(current), true, |
| DELETE_COOKIE_EVICTED_DOMAIN); |
| cookies->erase(cookies->begin() + current); |
| removed++; |
| - |
| + cookies_count_possibly_to_be_deleted--; |
| // The call to 'erase' above shifts the contents of the vector, but |
| // doesn't shift |protection_boundary|. Decrement that here to ensure that |
| - // the correct set of cookies is protected. |
| - protection_boundary--; |
| + // the correct set of cookies is protected.; |
| } else { |
| current++; |
| } |