Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(367)

Issue 197283002: Compute the keyTimes index correctly for discrete (values) animations (Closed)

Created:
6 years, 9 months ago by fs
Modified:
6 years, 9 months ago
CC:
blink-reviews, ed+blinkwatch_opera.com, shans, rjwright, alancutter (OOO until 2018), Mike Lawther (Google), rwlbuis, kouhei+svg_chromium.org, dstockwell, Timothy Loh, krit, gyuyoung.kim_webkit.org, darktears, Stephen Chennney, Steve Block, dino_apple.com, Eric Willigers
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Compute the keyTimes index correctly for discrete (values) animations The last value is allowed to be non-one for discrete mode animations (but not for linear and spline mode animations). TEST=svg/animations/animate-elem-{14,18}-t-drt.html BUG=350318 Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=169211 Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=169351

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Add ASSERT; Fix indexing in one caller. #

Patch Set 3 : Drop ASSERT about calcMode 'paced'. #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+17 lines, -14 lines) Patch
M LayoutTests/svg/animations/animate-elem-14-t-drt-expected.txt View 1 chunk +5 lines, -5 lines 0 comments Download
M LayoutTests/svg/animations/animate-elem-18-t-drt-expected.txt View 1 chunk +2 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M Source/core/svg/SVGAnimationElement.cpp View 1 2 2 chunks +10 lines, -7 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 14 (0 generated)
fs
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-12 14:19:41 UTC) #1
pdr.
Can we assert here that calcMode() isn't CalcModePaced? LGTM
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-13 06:15:38 UTC) #2
fs
On 2014/03/13 06:15:38, pdr wrote: > Can we assert here that calcMode() isn't CalcModePaced? Sure. ...
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-13 15:21:28 UTC) #3
pdr.
On 2014/03/13 15:21:28, fs wrote: > On 2014/03/13 06:15:38, pdr wrote: > > Can we ...
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-13 19:07:06 UTC) #4
pdr.
The CQ bit was checked by pdr@chromium.org
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-13 19:07:09 UTC) #5
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/fs@opera.com/197283002/20001
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-13 19:07:16 UTC) #6
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/fs@opera.com/197283002/20001
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-14 03:34:07 UTC) #7
commit-bot: I haz the power
Change committed as 169211
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-14 05:32:52 UTC) #8
f(malita)
On 2014/03/14 05:32:52, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote: > Change committed as 169211 This ...
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-14 20:03:42 UTC) #9
fs
On 2014/03/14 20:03:42, Florin Malita wrote: > On 2014/03/14 05:32:52, I haz the power (commit-bot) ...
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-17 08:32:51 UTC) #10
fs
On 2014/03/17 08:32:51, fs wrote: > On 2014/03/14 20:03:42, Florin Malita wrote: > > On ...
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-17 12:12:26 UTC) #11
fs
The CQ bit was checked by fs@opera.com
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-17 13:55:35 UTC) #12
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/fs@opera.com/197283002/40001
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-17 13:55:41 UTC) #13
commit-bot: I haz the power
6 years, 9 months ago (2014-03-17 13:56:00 UTC) #14
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Change committed as 169351

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698