Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(581)

Issue 1968933003: Do not create GpuVideoAcceleratorFactories if kDisableGpuCompositing is set (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 7 months ago by Julien Isorce Samsung
Modified:
4 years, 7 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews, mkwst+moarreviews-renderer_chromium.org, mlamouri+watch-content_chromium.org, jam, darin-cc_chromium.org, Daniele Castagna
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Do not create GpuVideoAcceleratorFactories if kDisableGpuCompositing is set Fixes [ERROR:video_layer_impl.cc] Not implemented reached in virtual void cc::VideoLayerImpl::AppendQuads(cc::RenderPass *, cc::AppendQuadsData *) BUG=606282 R=kbr@chromium.org, piman@chromium.org, zmo@chromium.org

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+7 lines, -2 lines) Patch
M content/renderer/render_thread_impl.cc View 3 chunks +7 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 8 (3 generated)
Julien Isorce Samsung
With Mesa software gl driver I could reproduce the error mentioned in the bug, i.e. ...
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-05-11 13:49:53 UTC) #1
commit-bot: I haz the power
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1968933003/1 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1968933003/1
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-05-11 13:50:19 UTC) #3
commit-bot: I haz the power
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-05-11 14:54:46 UTC) #5
piman
Daniele essentially implemented solution 2 in https://codereview.chromium.org/1972783002/ - He and I think that's the right ...
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-05-12 00:54:25 UTC) #6
Julien Isorce Samsung
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-05-16 09:30:40 UTC) #8
On 2016/05/12 00:54:25, piman OOO back 2016-5-16 wrote:
> Daniele essentially implemented solution 2 in
> https://codereview.chromium.org/1972783002/ - He and I think that's the right
> approach.

No problem, as I can see from emails it was quite urgent issue so I guess that's
why Daniele decided to create a new CL instead of reviewing mine. So I am going
to close it now.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698