Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(364)

Unified Diff: components/offline_pages/background/request_queue_in_memory_store.cc

Issue 1951483002: [Offline pages] Adding in memory request queue store with tests (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: components/offline_pages/background/request_queue_in_memory_store.cc
diff --git a/components/offline_pages/background/request_queue_in_memory_store.cc b/components/offline_pages/background/request_queue_in_memory_store.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8522ce93879092745ceaf67b3f1a573330ebb1c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/components/offline_pages/background/request_queue_in_memory_store.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "components/offline_pages/background/request_queue_in_memory_store.h"
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/location.h"
+#include "base/thread_task_runner_handle.h"
+#include "components/offline_pages/background/save_page_request.h"
+
+namespace offline_pages {
+
+RequestQueueInMemoryStore::RequestQueueInMemoryStore() {}
+
+RequestQueueInMemoryStore::~RequestQueueInMemoryStore() {}
+
+void RequestQueueInMemoryStore::GetRequests(
Pete Williamson 2016/05/03 20:38:52 In the future, it might be nice to be able to sear
fgorski 2016/05/03 21:50:21 Acknowledged.
+ const GetRequestsCallback& callback) {
+ std::vector<SavePageRequest> result;
+ for (const auto& id_request_pair : requests_)
+ result.push_back(id_request_pair.second);
+ base::ThreadTaskRunnerHandle::Get()->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE, base::Bind(callback, true, result));
Pete Williamson 2016/05/03 20:38:52 Would it make sense to batch these? This seems li
fgorski 2016/05/03 21:50:21 What is there to batch here exactly? This method m
Pete Williamson 2016/05/03 22:00:24 Ah, never mind, I missed that the result was a vec
dougarnett 2016/05/03 22:11:54 perhaps if "result" was named "results", it would
fgorski 2016/05/03 23:01:42 I see. I updated this to result_requests. I hope i
+}
+
+void RequestQueueInMemoryStore::AddOrUpdateRequest(
+ const SavePageRequest& request,
+ const UpdateCallback& callback) {
+ RequestsMap::iterator iter = requests_.find(request.request_id());
+ if (iter != requests_.end())
+ requests_.erase(iter);
+ requests_.insert(std::make_pair(request.request_id(), request));
+ base::ThreadTaskRunnerHandle::Get()->PostTask(FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(callback, true));
+}
+
+void RequestQueueInMemoryStore::RemoveRequests(
+ const std::vector<int64_t>& request_ids,
+ const UpdateCallback& callback) {
+ // We report true if the request ids is an empty list, or when we deleted at
+ // least one request.
Pete Williamson 2016/05/03 20:38:52 So how will the caller know when the list was empt
fgorski 2016/05/03 21:50:21 Done.
+ bool result = request_ids.empty();
+
+ RequestsMap::iterator iter;
+ for (auto request_id : request_ids) {
+ iter = requests_.find(request_id);
+ if (iter != requests_.end()) {
+ requests_.erase(iter);
+ result = true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ base::ThreadTaskRunnerHandle::Get()->PostTask(FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(callback, result));
+}
+
+void RequestQueueInMemoryStore::Reset(const ResetCallback& callback) {
+ // TODO(fgorski): use thread task runner handle to post the results back.
+ requests_.clear();
+ base::ThreadTaskRunnerHandle::Get()->PostTask(FROM_HERE,
+ base::Bind(callback, true));
+}
+
+} // namespace offline_pages

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698