fuzzer for net::NormalizeName

fuzzer for net::NormalizeName

BUG=

Committed: https://crrev.com/2c637da4df1dffc7412fb801cc670ea76b811879
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#390281}

[mattm, 2016-04-28 01:14:27]

mattm@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ eroman@chromium.org

[mattm, 2016-04-28 01:14:27]

Not sure if the second half (checking the renormalizing) is useful, wdyt?

[eroman, 2016-04-28 01:37:33]

I think re-checking the normalization is totally legit, sgtm!

[eroman, 2016-04-28 01:38:59]

LGTM.

Note that if ever this grows an ICU dependency (maybe for handling text
encodings), we would want to depend on net_fuzzer_test_support (since ICU
requires upfront initialization, and we already do that for GURL as part of that
target).

[mattm, 2016-04-28 02:03:26]

The CQ bit was checked by mattm@chromium.org

[mattm, 2016-04-28 02:03:26]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from eroman@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/1931723002/#ps20001
(title: "add //base dep")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-28 02:03:43]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1931723002/20001
View timeline at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1931723002/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-28 02:56:12]

Committed patchset #2 (id:20001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-30 17:15:44]

Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/2c637da4df1dffc7412fb801cc670ea76b811879
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#390281}

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-04-30 17:53:52]

Description was changed from

==========
fuzzer for net::NormalizeName

BUG=
==========

to

==========
fuzzer for net::NormalizeName

BUG=

Committed: https://crrev.com/2c637da4df1dffc7412fb801cc670ea76b811879
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#390281}
==========

[mmoroz, 2016-05-04 15:21:29]

The same situation as for socks fuzzers. Speed is fine, but coverage is low and
the fuzzer cannot find new interesting testcases. Would be awesome to have some
seed corpus:
https://pantheon.corp.google.com/storage/browser/clusterfuzz-corpus/libfuzzer...

[mattm, 2016-05-04 19:53:55]

On 2016/05/04 15:21:29, mmoroz wrote:
> The same situation as for socks fuzzers. Speed is fine, but coverage is low
and
> the fuzzer cannot find new interesting testcases. Would be awesome to have
some
> seed corpus:
>
https://pantheon.corp.google.com/storage/browser/clusterfuzz-corpus/libfuzzer...

I get a "You don't have permission to view the Storage Browser or Storage
Settings pages in this project." error on that link (using my google.com
account). Do I need to request access somehow?