Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(49)

Unified Diff: native_client_sdk/src/libraries/nacl_io_test/event_test.cc

Issue 19271009: [NaCl SDK} Add EventListener and EventEmitter to support epoll. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: remove extra mutex Created 7 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: native_client_sdk/src/libraries/nacl_io_test/event_test.cc
diff --git a/native_client_sdk/src/libraries/nacl_io_test/event_test.cc b/native_client_sdk/src/libraries/nacl_io_test/event_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b54614ada49f8320cee07ba44ae08dcb8dbcc5cc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/native_client_sdk/src/libraries/nacl_io_test/event_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
+/* Copyright (c) 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+ * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+ * found in the LICENSE file.
+ */
Sam Clegg 2013/07/17 17:34:56 C++ comment
Sam Clegg 2013/07/17 17:34:56 C++ comment
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <sys/stat.h>
+#include <sys/time.h>
+
+#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+
+#include "nacl_io/event_emitter.h"
+#include "nacl_io/event_listener.h"
+
+
+class EventEmitterTester : public EventEmitter {
+ public:
+ EventEmitterTester() : event_status_(0), event_cnt_(0) {}
+
+ void SetEventStatus(uint32_t bits) { event_status_ = bits; }
+ uint32_t GetEventStatus() { return event_status_; }
+
+ int GetType() { return S_IFSOCK; }
+
+ int NumEvents() { return event_cnt_; }
+
+ public:
+ // Make this function public for testing
+ void RaiseEvent(uint32_t events) {
binji 2013/07/17 22:23:20 just use "using EventEmitter::RaiseEvent;"
noelallen1 2013/07/18 22:18:16 I think the style is a bit ambiguous here. Using
+ EventEmitter::RaiseEvent(events);
+ }
+
+ // Called after registering locally, but while lock is still held.
+ void ChainRegister(const ScopedEventInfo& event) {
+ event_cnt_++;
+ }
+
+ // Called before unregistering locally, but while lock is still held.
+ void ChainUnregister(const ScopedEventInfo& event) {
+ event_cnt_--;
+ }
+
+ protected:
+ uint32_t event_status_;
+ uint32_t event_cnt_;
+};
+
+
+const int MAX_EVENTS = 8;
+const int FD_EMITTER = 5;
+const int DUP_EMITTER = 6;
+
+const uint32_t SIG_FILTER = 2;
+const uint64_t SIG_DATA = 1;
+
+TEST(EventTest, EmitterBasic) {
+ ScopedRef<EventEmitterTester> emitter(new EventEmitterTester());
+ ScopedRef<EventEmitter> null_emitter;
+ ScopedEventInfo null_info;
+
+ ScopedEventListener listener(new EventListener);
+
+ // Verify construction
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, emitter->NumEvents());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, emitter->GetEventStatus());
+
+ // Verify status
+ emitter->SetEventStatus(1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, emitter->GetEventStatus());
+
+ // Fail to update an FD not in the set
+ EXPECT_EQ(ENOENT, listener->Update(FD_EMITTER, SIG_FILTER, SIG_DATA));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ENOENT, listener->Free(FD_EMITTER));
+
+ // Set the emitter filter and data
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, listener->Track(FD_EMITTER, emitter, SIG_FILTER, SIG_DATA));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, emitter->NumEvents());
+
+ // Update an existing FD
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, listener->Update(FD_EMITTER, SIG_FILTER, SIG_DATA));
binji 2013/07/17 22:23:20 test that the values change?
noelallen1 2013/07/18 22:18:16 Done.
+
+ // Fail to add the same FD
+ EXPECT_EQ(EEXIST, listener->Track(FD_EMITTER, emitter, SIG_FILTER, SIG_DATA));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, emitter->NumEvents());
+
+ int event_cnt = 0;
+ EventData ev[MAX_EVENTS];
+
+ // Do not allow a wait with no events
+ EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, listener->Wait(ev, 0, 0, &event_cnt));
binji 2013/07/17 22:23:20 might be nice to mention that these are all withou
noelallen1 2013/07/18 22:18:16 I've replaced the const values with const variable
+
+ // Do not allow a wait with no events
+ EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, listener->Wait(ev, -1, 0, &event_cnt));
+
+ // Do not allow a wait with a NULL EventData pointer
+ EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, listener->Wait(NULL, MAX_EVENTS, 0, &event_cnt));
+
+ // Return unsignaled
+ memset(ev, 0, sizeof(ev));
+ event_cnt = 100;
+ emitter->SetEventStatus(0);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, listener->Wait(ev, MAX_EVENTS, 0, &event_cnt));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, event_cnt);
+
+ // Return with one event signaled
+ event_cnt = 100;
+ emitter->SetEventStatus(3);
binji 2013/07/17 22:23:20 SIG_FILTER? Though maybe an explicit test that ev
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, listener->Wait(ev, MAX_EVENTS, 0, &event_cnt));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, event_cnt);
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_DATA, ev[0].data);
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_FILTER, ev[0].events);
+
+ // Support adding a DUP
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, listener->Track(DUP_EMITTER, emitter, SIG_FILTER, SIG_DATA));
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, emitter->NumEvents());
+
+ // Return unsignaled
+ memset(ev, 0, sizeof(ev));
+ emitter->SetEventStatus(0);
+ event_cnt = 100;
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, listener->Wait(ev, MAX_EVENTS, 0, &event_cnt));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, event_cnt);
+
+ // Return with two event signaled
+ emitter->SetEventStatus(3);
+ event_cnt = 100;
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, listener->Wait(ev, MAX_EVENTS, 0, &event_cnt));
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, event_cnt);
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_DATA, ev[0].data);
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_FILTER, ev[0].events);
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_DATA, ev[1].data);
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_FILTER, ev[1].events);
Sam Clegg 2013/07/17 17:34:56 There are rather a lot of assertions in this one t
noelallen1 2013/07/17 21:00:18 I'm verifying the behavior of only a single call:
+}
+
+long Duration(struct timeval* start, struct timeval* end) {
+ if (start->tv_usec > end->tv_usec) {
+ end->tv_sec -= 1;
+ end->tv_usec += 1000000;
+ }
+ long cur_time = 1000 * (end->tv_sec - start->tv_sec);
+ cur_time += (end->tv_usec - start->tv_usec) / 1000;
+ return cur_time;
+}
+
+
+// Run a timed wait, and return the average of 8 iterations to reduce
+// chance of false negative on outlier.
+const int TRIES_TO_AVERAGE = 8;
+bool TimedListen(ScopedEventListener& listen,
+ EventData* ev,
+ int ev_max,
+ int ev_expect,
+ int ms_wait,
+ long* duration) {
+
+ struct timeval start;
+ struct timeval end;
+ long total_time = 0;
+
+ for (int a=0; a < TRIES_TO_AVERAGE; a++) {
+ gettimeofday(&start, NULL);
+
+ int signaled;
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, listen->Wait(ev, ev_max, ms_wait, &signaled));
+ EXPECT_EQ(signaled, ev_expect);
+
+ if (signaled != ev_expect) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ gettimeofday(&end, NULL);
+
+ long cur_time = Duration(&start, &end);
+ total_time += cur_time;
+ }
+
+ *duration = total_time / TRIES_TO_AVERAGE;
+ return true;
+}
+
+
+// NOTE: These timing tests are potentially flacky, the real test is
binji 2013/07/17 22:23:20 sp: flaky
noelallen1 2013/07/18 22:18:16 Done.
+// for the zero timeout should be, has the ConditionVariable been waited on?
+// Once we provide a debuggable SimpleCond and SimpleLock we can actually test
+// the correct thing.
+
+// MAX_MS_TIMEOUT
+const int NO_MS_TIMEOUT = 0;
+
+// Wait at most .5 seconds
+const int MAX_MS_TIMEOUT = 500;
+
+// Wait forever
+const int NEVER_TIMEOUT = -1;
+
+// However, normal schedule would expect us to see < 10ms, but we'll
+// use a much bigger number (yet smaller than the MAX_MS_TIMEOUT).
+const int MAX_MS_EXPECTED = MAX_MS_TIMEOUT / 2;
+
+const int EXPECT_ONE_EVENT = 1;
+const int EXPECT_NO_EVENT = 0;
+
+TEST(EventTest, EmitterTimeout) {
+ ScopedRef<EventEmitterTester> emitter(new EventEmitterTester());
+ ScopedEventListener listener(new EventListener());
+ long duration;
+
+ EventData ev[MAX_EVENTS];
+ memset(ev, 0, sizeof(ev));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, listener->Track(FD_EMITTER, emitter, SIG_FILTER, SIG_DATA));
+
+ // Return immediately when emitter is signaled, with no timeout
+ emitter->SetEventStatus(SIG_FILTER);
+ memset(ev, 0, sizeof(ev));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TimedListen(listener, ev, MAX_EVENTS, EXPECT_ONE_EVENT,
+ NO_MS_TIMEOUT, &duration));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_DATA, ev[0].data);
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_FILTER, ev[0].events);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, duration);
+
+ // Return immediately when emitter is signaled, even with timeout
+ emitter->SetEventStatus(SIG_FILTER);
+ memset(ev, 0, sizeof(ev));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TimedListen(listener, ev, MAX_EVENTS, EXPECT_ONE_EVENT,
+ MAX_MS_TIMEOUT, &duration));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_DATA, ev[0].data);
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_FILTER, ev[0].events);
+ EXPECT_GT(25, duration);
binji 2013/07/17 22:23:20 const for 25 too?
noelallen1 2013/07/18 22:18:16 Done.
+
+ // Return immediately when emitter is signaled, when block forever
+ emitter->SetEventStatus(SIG_FILTER);
+ memset(ev, 0, sizeof(ev));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TimedListen(listener, ev, MAX_EVENTS, EXPECT_ONE_EVENT,
+ NEVER_TIMEOUT, &duration));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_DATA, ev[0].data);
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_FILTER, ev[0].events);
+ EXPECT_GT(25, duration);
+
+ // Timeout immediately when emitter is not signaled
+ emitter->SetEventStatus(0);
+ memset(ev, 0, sizeof(ev));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TimedListen(listener, ev, MAX_EVENTS, EXPECT_NO_EVENT,
+ NO_MS_TIMEOUT, &duration));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ev[0].data);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ev[0].events);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, duration);
+
+ // Return after timeout when emitter not signaled
+ emitter->SetEventStatus(0);
+ memset(ev, 0, sizeof(ev));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TimedListen(listener, ev, MAX_EVENTS, EXPECT_NO_EVENT,
+ MAX_MS_TIMEOUT, &duration));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ev[0].data);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ev[0].events);
+ EXPECT_LT(MAX_MS_TIMEOUT - 1, duration);
+ EXPECT_GT(MAX_MS_TIMEOUT + MAX_MS_TIMEOUT, duration);
Sam Clegg 2013/07/17 17:34:56 ditto.
noelallen1 2013/07/17 21:00:18 Done.
+}
+
+struct SignalInfo {
+ EventEmitterTester* em;
+ unsigned int ms_wait;
+ uint32_t events;
+};
+
+void *SignalEmitter(void *ptr) {
+ SignalInfo* info = (SignalInfo*) ptr;
+ struct timespec ts;
+ ts.tv_sec = 0;
+ ts.tv_nsec = info->ms_wait * 1000000;
+
+ nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
+
+ info->em->RaiseEvent(info->events);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+const int VERY_LONG_WAIT = 1000;
+TEST(EventTest, EmitterSignalling) {
+ ScopedRef<EventEmitterTester> emitter(new EventEmitterTester());
+ ScopedEventListener listener(new EventListener);
+
+ SignalInfo siginfo;
+ struct timeval start;
+ struct timeval end;
+ long duration;
+
+ EventData ev[MAX_EVENTS];
+ memset(ev, 0, sizeof(ev));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, listener->Track(FD_EMITTER, emitter, SIG_FILTER, SIG_DATA));
+
+ siginfo.em = emitter.get();
+ siginfo.ms_wait = VERY_LONG_WAIT / 4;
+ siginfo.events = SIG_FILTER;
+
+ pthread_t tid;
+ pthread_create(&tid, NULL, SignalEmitter, &siginfo);
+
+ gettimeofday(&start, NULL);
+ int cnt = 0;
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, listener->Wait(ev, MAX_EVENTS, VERY_LONG_WAIT, &cnt));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, cnt);
+ gettimeofday(&end, NULL);
+
+ duration = Duration(&start, &end);
+ EXPECT_GT(VERY_LONG_WAIT, duration);
+ EXPECT_LT((VERY_LONG_WAIT / 4) - 1, duration);
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_DATA, ev[0].data);
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIG_FILTER, ev[0].events);
+}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698