Implement a dummy host to do capturing and analysis only.

remoting/test/dummy_host.cc

Index: remoting/test/dummy_host.cc
diff --git a/remoting/test/dummy_host.cc b/remoting/test/dummy_host.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d34156651947b3a556c0cea433e4a6cf0fd9051b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/remoting/test/dummy_host.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,445 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.

[joedow, 2016/04/28 22:53:54]

no copyright in the header for new files.

[Hzj_jie, 2016/05/03 19:07:05]

Done.

+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include <cassert>
+#include <iostream>
+#include <memory>
+#include <string>
+#include <vector>
+
+#include "base/at_exit.h"
+#include "base/atomicops.h"
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/command_line.h"
+#include "base/location.h"
+#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "base/memory/ptr_util.h"
+#include "base/memory/ref_counted.h"
+#include "base/message_loop/message_loop.h"
+#include "base/run_loop.h"
+#include "base/threading/platform_thread.h"
+#include "base/time/time.h"
+#include "remoting/base/auto_thread_task_runner.h"
+#include "remoting/codec/video_encoder_verbatim.h"
+#include "remoting/codec/video_encoder_vpx.h"
+#include "remoting/host/chromoting_host.h"
+#include "remoting/host/chromoting_host_context.h"
+#include "remoting/host/client_session.h"
+#include "remoting/host/host_extension.h"
+#include "remoting/host/host_mock_objects.h"
+#include "remoting/host/it2me_desktop_environment.h"
+#include "remoting/host/resources.h"
+#include "remoting/proto/audio.pb.h"
+#include "remoting/protocol/audio_stub.h"
+#include "remoting/protocol/fake_connection_to_client.h"
+#include "remoting/protocol/pairing_registry.h"
+#include "remoting/protocol/protocol_mock_objects.h"
+#include "remoting/protocol/session_config.h"
+#include "remoting/protocol/video_frame_pump.h"
+#include "remoting/protocol/video_stub.h"
+
+#if defined(OS_LINUX)
+#include <gtk/gtk.h>
+#include <X11/Xlib.h>
+
+#include "base/linux_util.h"
+#endif  // defined(OS_LINUX)
+
+using base::AtExitManager;
+using base::Bind;
+using base::Closure;
+using base::CommandLine;
+using base::MessageLoopForUI;
+using base::RunLoop;
+using base::TimeDelta;
+using base::WrapUnique;
+using google::protobuf::MessageLite;
+using remoting::AudioPacket;
+using remoting::ChromotingHostContext;
+using remoting::ClientSession;
+using remoting::HostExtension;
+using remoting::MockClientSessionEventHandler;
+using remoting::It2MeDesktopEnvironmentFactory;
+using remoting::VideoAck;
+using remoting::VideoEncoder;
+using remoting::VideoEncoderVpx;
+using remoting::VideoEncoderVerbatim;
+using remoting::VideoPacket;
+using remoting::protocol::AudioControl;
+using remoting::protocol::AudioStub;
+using remoting::protocol::Capabilities;
+using remoting::protocol::ChannelConfig;
+using remoting::protocol::ClientResolution;
+using remoting::protocol::ClientStub;
+using remoting::protocol::ClipboardEvent;
+using remoting::protocol::ConnectionToClient;
+using remoting::protocol::CursorShapeInfo;
+using remoting::protocol::ExtensionMessage;
+using remoting::protocol::FakeConnectionToClient;
+using remoting::protocol::HostStub;
+using remoting::protocol::MockClientStub;
+using remoting::protocol::MockHostStub;
+using remoting::protocol::MockSession;
+using remoting::protocol::PairingRegistry;
+using remoting::protocol::PairingRequest;
+using remoting::protocol::PairingResponse;
+using remoting::protocol::SessionConfig;
+using remoting::protocol::VideoControl;
+using remoting::protocol::VideoFeedbackStub;
+using remoting::protocol::VideoFramePump;
+using remoting::protocol::VideoLayout;
+using remoting::protocol::VideoStream;
+using remoting::protocol::VideoStub;
+using std::cout;
+using std::endl;
+using std::move;
+using std::string;
+using std::vector;
+using std::unique_ptr;
+using testing::ReturnRef;
+using webrtc::DesktopCapturer;

[joedow, 2016/04/28 22:53:55]

In general we don't use using statements like this in chromium.

[Hzj_jie, 2016/05/03 19:07:05]

Yes, I should remove most of them before sending out the CR, but unfortunately I
forgot. This has been done in the next iteration.

+
+namespace {
+
+const bool g_output_to_stdout = false;
+
+template <typename T>
+class NoBarrierAtomic {
+ public:
+  T operator++() {
+    return base::subtle::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(&i, 1) - 1;
+  }
+
+  T operator++(int) {
+    return base::subtle::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(&i, 1);
+  }
+
+  T operator--() {
+    return base::subtle::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(&i, -1) - 1;
+  }
+
+  T operator--(int) {
+    return base::subtle::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(&i, -1);
+  }
+
+  T operator+=(T other) {
+    return base::subtle::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(&i, other);
+  }
+
+  T operator-=(T other) {
+    return base::subtle::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(&i, -other);
+  }
+
+  T operator*() const {
+    return base::subtle::NoBarrier_Load(&i);
+  }
+
+ private:
+  volatile T i;
+};
+
+class NoBarrierAtomicInt32 : public NoBarrierAtomic<base::subtle::Atomic32> {};
+#if ARCH_CPU_64_BITS
+class NoBarrierAtomicInt64 : public NoBarrierAtomic<base::subtle::Atomic64> {};
+#else
+
+#include "base/synchronization/lock.h"
+using base::AutoLock;
+using base::Lock;
+
+// A barriered, lock based implementation
+class NoBarrierAtomicInt64 {
+ public:
+  int64_t operator++() {
+    AutoLock l(lock);
+    return i++;
+  }
+
+  int64_t operator++(int) {
+    AutoLock l(lock);
+    return ++i;
+  }
+
+  int64_t operator--() {
+    AutoLock l(lock);
+    return i--;
+  }
+
+  int64_t operator--(int) {
+    AutoLock l(lock);
+    return --i;
+  }
+
+  int64_t operator+=(int64_t other) {
+    AutoLock l(lock);
+    return (i += other);
+  }
+
+  int64_t operator-=(int64_t other) {
+    AutoLock l(lock);
+    return (i -= other);
+  }
+
+  int64_t operator*() const {
+    base::subtle::MemoryBarrier();
+    return i;
+  }
+
+ private:
+  volatile int64_t i;
+  Lock lock;
+};
+#endif
+
+class MessageLogger {

[joedow, 2016/04/28 22:53:55]

Why aren't you using the standard logging infra we already have?

[Hzj_jie, 2016/05/03 19:07:05]

Renamed to MessageCounter, sorry for the confusion, it's not a logger.

+ public:
+  MessageLogger()
+    : count_(),
+      size_(),
+      last_size_(),
+      started_(base::Time::Now()) {}
+
+  int message_count() const {
+    return *count_;
+  }
+
+  int64_t message_size() const {
+    return *size_;
+  }
+
+  int last_message_size() const {
+    return last_size_;
+  }
+
+  double DurationSeconds() const {
+    return (base::Time::Now() - started_).InSecondsF();
+  }
+
+ protected:
+  void LogMessage(const MessageLite& message) {
+    count_++;
+    last_size_ = message.ByteSize();
+    size_ += last_size_;
+  }
+
+ private:
+  NoBarrierAtomicInt32 count_;
+  NoBarrierAtomicInt64 size_;
+  int last_size_;
+  base::Time started_;
+};
+
+class LogClientStub : public ClientStub, public MessageLogger {
+ public:
+  void SetCapabilities(const Capabilities& capabilities) override {}
+  void SetPairingResponse(const PairingResponse& response) override {}
+  void InjectClipboardEvent(const ClipboardEvent& event) override {}
+  void SetCursorShape(const CursorShapeInfo& cursor_shape) override {}
+
+  void DeliverHostMessage(const ExtensionMessage& message) override {
+    if (g_output_to_stdout) {
+      cout << "DeliverHostMessage(" << message.ByteSize() << ")" << endl;

[joedow, 2016/04/28 22:53:54]

I don't think cout is right, we should use the same mechanism as the rest of the
codebase (LOG/VLOG/DLOG/etc).  Take a look at using InitLogging to see if that
gives you what you want.  I don't think it makes sense to implement a new
logging mechanism though.

[Hzj_jie, 2016/05/03 19:07:05]

These cout(s) have been removed, they were for a quick debugging purpose.

+    }
+    LogMessage(message);
+  }
+
+  void SetVideoLayout(const VideoLayout& video_layout) override {}
+};
+
+class LogHostStub : public HostStub, public MessageLogger {
+ public:
+  void NotifyClientResolution(const ClientResolution& resolution) override {}
+  void ControlVideo(const VideoControl& video_control) override {}
+  void ControlAudio(const AudioControl& audio_control) override {}
+  void SetCapabilities(const Capabilities& capabilities) override {}
+  void RequestPairing(const PairingRequest& pairing_request) override {}
+
+  void DeliverClientMessage(const ExtensionMessage& message) override {
+    if (g_output_to_stdout) {
+      cout << "DeliverClientMessage(" << message.ByteSize() << ")" << endl;
+    }
+    LogMessage(message);
+  }
+};
+
+class LogAudioStub : public AudioStub, public MessageLogger {
+ public:
+  void ProcessAudioPacket(unique_ptr<AudioPacket> audio_packet,
+                          const Closure& done) override {
+    if (audio_packet) {
+      if (g_output_to_stdout) {
+        cout << "ProcessAudioPacket(" << audio_packet->data_size();
+        for (int i = 0; i < audio_packet->data_size(); i++) {
+          cout << " - " << audio_packet->data(i).size();
+        }
+        cout << ")" << endl;
+      }
+      LogMessage(*audio_packet);
+    }
+    done.Run();
+  }
+};
+
+class LogVideoStub : public VideoStub, public MessageLogger {
+ public:
+  LogVideoStub(FakeConnectionToClient* connection) : connection_(connection) {}
+
+  void ProcessVideoPacket(unique_ptr<VideoPacket> video_packet,
+                          const Closure& done) override {
+    if (video_packet) {
+      if (g_output_to_stdout) {
+        cout << "ProcessVideoPacket("
+             << video_packet->data().size()
+             << ")"
+             << endl;
+      }
+      if (connection_ && connection_->video_feedback_stub()) {
+        VideoAck* ack = new VideoAck();
+        ack->set_frame_id(video_packet->frame_id());
+        connection_->video_feedback_stub()->ProcessVideoAck(WrapUnique(ack));
+      }
+      LogMessage(*video_packet);
+    }
+    done.Run();
+  }
+
+ private:
+  FakeConnectionToClient* connection_ = nullptr;
+};
+
+// Stores all objects a host needs
+struct Container {

[joedow, 2016/04/28 22:53:55]

I wonder if this should be a class and go into it's own file.  Also change the
name so it is descriptive.

This feels like the class could implement the Stub functions above as well so it
is more self-contained.

[Hzj_jie, 2016/05/03 19:07:05]

Done.

+  MessageLoopForUI message_loop;
+  RunLoop run_loop;
+  unique_ptr<ChromotingHostContext> context;
+  It2MeDesktopEnvironmentFactory factory;
+  FakeConnectionToClient connection;
+  string session_jid;
+  unique_ptr<SessionConfig> config;
+  LogAudioStub audio_stub;
+  LogVideoStub video_stub;
+  LogClientStub client_stub;
+  LogHostStub host_stub;
+  MockClientSessionEventHandler handler;
+  unique_ptr<ClientSession> session;
+
+  Container()
+      : message_loop(),
+        run_loop(),
+        context(ChromotingHostContext::Create(
+            new remoting::AutoThreadTaskRunner(
+            message_loop.task_runner(), run_loop.QuitClosure()))),
+        factory(context->network_task_runner(),
+                context->video_capture_task_runner(),
+                context->input_task_runner(),
+                context->ui_task_runner()),
+        connection(WrapUnique(new MockSession())),
+        session_jid("user@domain/rest-of-jid"),
+#if defined(OS_LINUX)
+        config(SessionConfig::ForTest()),  // Need a pipe name for linux

[joedow, 2016/04/28 22:53:55]

This comment is confusing to me, is a pipe name specified elsewhere?  or is this
more of a TODO?

[Hzj_jie, 2016/05/03 19:07:05]

Updated. We cannot support audio capture in Linux now, since we need a pipe
name.

+#else
+        config(SessionConfig::ForTestWithAudio()),
+#endif
+        audio_stub(),
+        video_stub(&connection),
+        client_stub(),
+        host_stub(),
+        handler(),
+        session() {
+    EXPECT_CALL(*static_cast<MockSession*>(connection.session()), jid())

[joedow, 2016/04/28 22:53:55]

Did you pull in the GMOCK header?  I didn't see it above.  Also, if you don't
care about the return values (which I don't think you do) you can use something
like the following to silence the warnings:
testing::nice_mock<MockedClientSessionEventHandler> mock_object;

[Hzj_jie, 2016/05/03 19:07:05]

Great, thank you for the hint.

+        .WillRepeatedly(ReturnRef(session_jid));
+    EXPECT_CALL(*static_cast<MockSession*>(connection.session()), config())
+        .WillRepeatedly(ReturnRef(*config));
+    connection.set_audio_stub(&audio_stub);
+    connection.set_video_stub(&video_stub);
+    connection.set_client_stub(&client_stub);
+    connection.set_host_stub(&host_stub);
+    connection.set_video_encode_task_runner(
+        context->video_encode_task_runner());
+  }
+
+  void CreateClientSession() {
+    // Must run in network_task_runner

[joedow, 2016/04/28 22:53:55]

You should DCHECK this to prevent it.

[Hzj_jie, 2016/05/03 19:07:05]

No, ClientSession::OnConnectionAuthenticated and other similar functions have
the DCHECK embedded.

+    session.reset(new ClientSession(
+        &handler,
+        context->audio_task_runner(),
+        unique_ptr<ConnectionToClient>(&connection),
+        &factory,
+        TimeDelta(),
+        scoped_refptr<PairingRegistry>(),
+        vector<HostExtension*>()));
+  }
+};
+
+void Execute(Container* container) {
+  container->CreateClientSession();
+  container->session->OnConnectionAuthenticated(&container->connection);
+  container->session->OnConnectionChannelsConnected(&container->connection);
+  container->session->CreateVideoStreams(&container->connection);
+}
+
+void BindAnalysisResultOutputter(Container* container);
+
+void OutputLogger(const char* name, const MessageLogger& logger) {
+  cout << name
+       << ": "
+       << logger.message_size()
+       << " bytes in "
+       << logger.message_count()
+       << " packages, last package "
+       << logger.last_message_size()
+       << " bytes, "
+       << static_cast<double>(logger.message_size()) / logger.message_count()
+       << " bytes/package, "
+       << static_cast<double>(logger.message_count()) / logger.DurationSeconds()
+       << " packages/sec, "
+       << static_cast<double>(logger.message_size()) / logger.DurationSeconds()
+       << " bytes/sec"
+       << endl;
+}
+
+void OutputAnalysisResult(Container* container) {
+  OutputLogger("audio", container->audio_stub);
+  OutputLogger("video", container->video_stub);
+  OutputLogger("client", container->client_stub);
+  OutputLogger("host", container->host_stub);
+  BindAnalysisResultOutputter(container);
+}
+
+void BindAnalysisResultOutputter(Container* container) {
+  container->context->ui_task_runner()->PostDelayedTask(
+      FROM_HERE,
+      Bind(&OutputAnalysisResult, container),
+      TimeDelta::FromSeconds(1));
+}
+
+}  // namespace
+
+int main(int argc, const char** argv) {
+  AtExitManager at_exit_manager;
+  CommandLine::Init(argc, argv);
+  CommandLine::ForCurrentProcess()->AppendSwitch("disable-it2me-ui");

[joedow, 2016/04/28 22:53:55]

This feels odd unless there is a use case where we want to use this value on the
command line.  Is it possible to add this as a param to the factory instead?

[Hzj_jie, 2016/05/03 19:07:05]

Yes, removed.

+  Container container;
+
+#if defined(OS_LINUX)
+  // Required in order for us to run multiple X11 threads.
+  XInitThreads();
+
+  // Required for any calls into GTK functions, such as the Disconnect and
+  // Continue windows. Calling with nullptr arguments because we don't have
+  // any command line arguments for gtk to consume.
+  gtk_init(nullptr, nullptr);
+
+  // Need to prime the host OS version value for linux to prevent IO on the
+  // network thread. base::GetLinuxDistro() caches the result.
+  base::GetLinuxDistro();
+#endif  // OS_LINUX
+
+  assert(remoting::LoadResources("en-US"));

[joedow, 2016/04/28 22:53:55]

Why aren't we using chromium asserts here?

[Hzj_jie, 2016/05/03 19:07:05]

Done.

+  container.context->network_task_runner()->PostTask(
+      FROM_HERE,
+      Bind(&Execute, &container));
+  BindAnalysisResultOutputter(&container);
+  container.run_loop.Run();
+}