Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(62)

Issue 1922723002: Revert of Make `git cl description` work for Gerrit (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 7 months ago by Ryan Tseng
Modified:
4 years, 7 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews, tandrii+omg_git_cl_chromium.org, dpranke+depot_tools_chromium.org, iannucci+depot_tools_chromium.org
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/depot_tools.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/heads/master
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Revert of Make `git cl description` work for Gerrit (patchset #2 id:20001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1917473002/ ) Reason for revert: Broke presubmit? Original issue's description: > Make `git cl description` work for Gerrit > > This works in that it actually changes the description, but after > multiple changes, there's multiple footers added. I'm not sure if they > should be stripped in setting the description? Or is the problem in > FetchDescription() where it shouldn't be returning > 'commit_with_footers', but rather something else? > > Example change at https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/340430/. > > R=tandrii@chromium.org > BUG=603207 > > Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=300169 TBR=tandrii@chromium.org,scottmg@chromium.org,iannucci@chromium.org # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=603207

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+2 lines, -34 lines) Patch
M gerrit_util.py View 1 chunk +0 lines, -32 lines 0 comments Download
M git_cl.py View 1 chunk +2 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 23 (11 generated)
Ryan Tseng
Created Revert of Make `git cl description` work for Gerrit
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-04-25 21:56:30 UTC) #1
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1922723002/1 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1922723002/1
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-04-25 21:56:33 UTC) #2
commit-bot: I haz the power
No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. CQ run can only be started by full ...
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-04-25 21:56:34 UTC) #4
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1922723002/1 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1922723002/1
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-04-25 22:00:40 UTC) #8
commit-bot: I haz the power
No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. CQ run can only be started by full ...
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-04-25 22:00:42 UTC) #10
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1922723002/1 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1922723002/1
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-04-25 22:00:50 UTC) #13
commit-bot: I haz the power
No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. CQ run can only be started by full ...
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-04-25 22:00:52 UTC) #16
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1922723002/1 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1922723002/1
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-04-25 22:02:20 UTC) #18
commit-bot: I haz the power
No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. CQ run can only be started by full ...
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-04-25 22:02:22 UTC) #20
scottmg
Sorry, thanks. I have no idea how that broke things.
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-04-25 22:02:33 UTC) #21
chromium-reviews
I'm not sure either, pylint is strange. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:02 PM, ...
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-04-25 22:03:38 UTC) #22
tandrii(chromium)
4 years, 7 months ago (2016-04-26 10:36:55 UTC) #23
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Actually, no, pyling isn't strange :) This was the last NotImplementedError,
making the class no-longer abstract, hence a new check by pylint :)
So, solution is simple, we just have to create a new TODO method :)

On 2016/04/25 22:03:38, chromium-reviews wrote:
> I'm not sure either, pylint is strange.
> 
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:02 PM, <mailto:scottmg@chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> > Sorry, thanks. I have no idea how that broke things.
> >
> > https://codereview.chromium.org/1922723002/
> >
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Chromium-reviews" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email
> to mailto:chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698