Index: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/http/tests/security/view-source-navigation-block.html |
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/http/tests/security/view-source-navigation-block.html b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/http/tests/security/view-source-navigation-block.html |
new file mode 100644 |
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fcaa2950834784fa665ee2a5553d9c2df91eb97a |
--- /dev/null |
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/http/tests/security/view-source-navigation-block.html |
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ |
+<html lang="en"> |
+<head> |
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> |
+<title>view-source navigation should be blocked</title> |
+</head> |
+<script> |
+window.onunload = function() { |
+ console.error('FAIL'); |
+ testRunner.notifyDone(); |
Nate Chapin
2016/05/27 23:57:32
Nit: if (window.testRunner)
|
+} |
+function test() { |
+ window.location = "view-source:about:blank"; |
+ setTimeout(function() { |
+ if (window.testRunner) { |
+ document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = "PASS"; |
+ testRunner.notifyDone(); |
+ } |
+ }, 1000); |
meacer
2016/05/23 23:57:47
This is ugly as it uses setTimeout with a non-zero
Charlie Reis
2016/05/24 22:54:17
Yeah, we shouldn't do this. Maybe there's an erro
Nate Chapin
2016/05/27 23:57:32
This is a bit tougher because it's view-source. No
meacer
2016/05/31 23:57:54
Looks like queueLoad triggers a browser initiated
Charlie Reis
2016/06/01 22:59:51
Do we actually need a layout test for this? You'v
|
+} |
+if (window.testRunner) { |
+ testRunner.dumpAsText(); |
+ testRunner.waitUntilDone(); |
+} |
+document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', test, false); |
+</script> |
+<div id="result"></div> |
+</html> |