Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1112)

Unified Diff: content/browser/frame_host/mixed_content_navigation_throttle.cc

Issue 1905033002: PlzNavigate: Move navigation-level mixed content checks to the browser. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@console-security-message
Patch Set: MixedContent::ContextType comes from the renderer; lessen Blink public code; fixed build. Created 3 years, 11 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/browser/frame_host/mixed_content_navigation_throttle.cc
diff --git a/content/browser/frame_host/mixed_content_navigation_throttle.cc b/content/browser/frame_host/mixed_content_navigation_throttle.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8e144d29bd749d2796766cf60cf9bf81699f8c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/browser/frame_host/mixed_content_navigation_throttle.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "content/browser/frame_host/mixed_content_navigation_throttle.h"
+
+#include "base/strings/stringprintf.h"
+#include "content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree.h"
+#include "content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree_node.h"
+#include "content/browser/frame_host/navigation_handle_impl.h"
+#include "content/browser/frame_host/render_frame_host_delegate.h"
+#include "content/browser/renderer_host/render_view_host_impl.h"
+#include "content/common/frame_messages.h"
+#include "content/public/browser/content_browser_client.h"
+#include "content/public/browser/render_frame_host.h"
+#include "content/public/common/browser_side_navigation_policy.h"
+#include "content/public/common/content_client.h"
+#include "content/public/common/origin_util.h"
+#include "content/public/common/url_constants.h"
+#include "content/public/common/web_preferences.h"
+#include "net/base/url_util.h"
+#include "url/gurl.h"
+#include "url/origin.h"
+#include "url/url_constants.h"
+
+namespace {
+
+using namespace content;
+
+// Should return the same value as SchemeRegistry::shouldTreatURLSchemeAsSecure.
+bool IsSecureScheme(const std::string& scheme) {
+ // TODO(carlosk): find out how to properly handle these secure schemes. Should
+ // statically defined ones in Chrome/embedder come from a shared file? Should
+ // dynamically defined ones from extensions register both with browser and
+ // renderer code? See https://crbug.com/627502.
+ bool result =
+ // Note: schemes statically defined in secureSchemes()
+ scheme == url::kHttpsScheme || scheme == url::kAboutScheme ||
+ scheme == url::kDataScheme || scheme == url::kWssScheme ||
+ // Note: schemes "dynamically" registered with
+ // SchemeRegistry::registerURLSchemeAsSecure.
+ scheme == kChromeUIScheme;
+ return result;
+}
+
+// Should return the same value as SchemeRegistry::shouldTreatURLSchemeAsSecure.
+bool HasPotentiallySecureScheme(const GURL& url) {
+ return IsSecureScheme(url.scheme());
+}
+
+// Should return the same value as SecurityOrigin::isLocal and
+// SchemeRegistry::shouldTreatURLSchemeAsLocal.
+bool HasLocalScheme(const GURL& url) {
+ // TODO(carlosk): Same registration problem as described in
+ // HasPotentiallySecureScheme applies here. See https://crbug.com/627502.
+ bool result =
+ // Note: schemes statically defined in schemesWithUniqueOrigins()
+ url.SchemeIs(url::kAboutScheme) || url.SchemeIs(url::kJavaScriptScheme) ||
+ url.SchemeIs(url::kDataScheme) ||
+ // Note: schemes "dynamically" registered with
+ // SchemeRegistry::registerURLSchemeAsNoAccess. There's no content/
+ // re-definition of kChromeNativeScheme.
+ url.SchemeIs("chrome-native");
+ return result;
+}
+
+// Should return the same value as SecurityOrigin::isSecure.
+bool SecurityOriginIsSecure(const GURL& url) {
+ return HasPotentiallySecureScheme(url) ||
+ (url.SchemeIsFileSystem() && url.inner_url() &&
+ HasPotentiallySecureScheme(*url.inner_url())) ||
+ (url.SchemeIsBlob() &&
+ HasPotentiallySecureScheme(GURL(url.GetContent()))) ||
+ IsOriginWhiteListedTrustworthy(url);
+}
+
+// Should return the same value as the resource URL checks made inside
+// MixedContentChecker::isMixedContent.
+bool IsUrlPotentiallySecure(const GURL& url) {
+ // TODO(carlosk): secure origin checks don't match between content and Blink
+ // hence this implementation here instead of a direct call to IsOriginSecure
+ // (in origin_util.cc). See https://crbug.com/629059.
+
+ bool is_secure = SecurityOriginIsSecure(url);
+
+ // blob: and filesystem: URLs never hit the network, and access is restricted
+ // to same-origin contexts, so they are not blocked either.
+ if (url.SchemeIs(url::kBlobScheme) || url.SchemeIs(url::kFileSystemScheme))
+ is_secure |= true;
+
+ // Mimics SecurityOrigin::isPotentiallyTrustworthy without duplicating (much)
+ // of the checks already done previously.
+ if (HasLocalScheme(url) || net::IsLocalhost(url.HostNoBrackets()))
jam 2017/01/06 21:20:13 for clarity, it would help to split the HasLocalSc
carlosk 2017/01/10 02:10:44 Done.
+ is_secure |= true;
+
+ // TODO(mkwst): Remove this once 'localhost' is no longer considered
+ // potentially trustworthy.
+ if (is_secure && url.SchemeIs(url::kHttpScheme) &&
+ net::IsLocalHostname(url.HostNoBrackets(), nullptr)) {
+ is_secure = false;
+ }
+
+ return is_secure;
+}
+
+// This method should return the same results as
+// SchemeRegistry::shouldTreatURLSchemeAsRestrictingMixedContent.
+bool DoesOriginSchemeRestricsMixedContent(const url::Origin& origin) {
+ return origin.scheme() == url::kHttpsScheme;
+}
+
+bool ShouldTreatURLSchemeAsCORSEnabled(const GURL& url) {
+ // TODO(carlosk): for CORS schemes we have the exact same issue as for the
+ // secure schemes above. See callers to and references in
+ // WebSecurityPolicy::registerURLSchemeAsCORSEnabled. See
+ // https://crbug.com/627502.
+ return
+ // Note: CORS schemes statically defined in CORSEnabledSchemes()
+ url.SchemeIsHTTPOrHTTPS() || url.SchemeIs(url::kDataScheme) ||
+ // Note: CORS schemes "dynamically" registered in
+ // RenderThreadImpl::RegisterSchemes.
jam 2017/01/06 21:20:13 nit: also mention that extensions/renderer/dispatc
carlosk 2017/01/10 02:10:44 Done. I reorganized all hard coded scheme code and
+ url.SchemeIs(kChromeUIScheme);
+}
+
+void UpdateRendererOnMixedContentFound(NavigationHandleImpl* handle_impl,
+ const GURL& mixed_content_url,
+ bool was_allowed,
+ bool for_redirect) {
+ // TODO(carlosk): the root node should never be considered mixed content for
+ // now. Once/if the browser starts also checking form submits than this will
+ // happen and this DCHECK should be updated.
+ DCHECK(handle_impl->frame_tree_node()->parent());
+ RenderFrameHost* rfh = handle_impl->frame_tree_node()->current_frame_host();
+ rfh->Send(new FrameMsg_MixedContentFoundByTheBrowser(
+ rfh->GetRoutingID(), mixed_content_url, handle_impl->GetURL(),
+ handle_impl->request_context_type(), was_allowed, for_redirect));
+}
+
+} // namespace
+
+namespace content {
+
+MixedContentNavigationThrottle::MixedContentNavigationThrottle(
+ NavigationHandle* navigation_handle)
+ : NavigationThrottle(navigation_handle) {
+ DCHECK(IsBrowserSideNavigationEnabled());
+}
+
+MixedContentNavigationThrottle::~MixedContentNavigationThrottle() {}
+
+ThrottleCheckResult MixedContentNavigationThrottle::WillStartRequest() {
+ bool should_block = ShouldBlockNavigation(false);
+ return should_block ? ThrottleCheckResult::CANCEL
+ : ThrottleCheckResult::PROCEED;
+}
+
+ThrottleCheckResult MixedContentNavigationThrottle::WillRedirectRequest() {
+ // Upon redirects the same checks are to be executed as for requests.
+ bool should_block = ShouldBlockNavigation(true);
+ return should_block ? ThrottleCheckResult::CANCEL
+ : ThrottleCheckResult::PROCEED;
+}
+
+ThrottleCheckResult MixedContentNavigationThrottle::WillProcessResponse() {
+ // TODO(carlosk): at this point we must check the final security level of
+ // the connection! Does it use an outdated protocol? See
+ // MixedContentChecker::handleCertificateError
+ return ThrottleCheckResult::PROCEED;
+}
+
+// Based off of MixedContentChecker::shouldBlockFetch.
+bool MixedContentNavigationThrottle::ShouldBlockNavigation(bool for_redirect) {
+ NavigationHandleImpl* handle_impl =
+ static_cast<NavigationHandleImpl*>(navigation_handle());
+ FrameTreeNode* node = handle_impl->frame_tree_node();
+
+ // Find the parent node with mixed content, if any.
+ FrameTreeNode* mixed_content_node =
+ InWhichFrameIsContentMixed(node, handle_impl->GetURL());
+ if (!mixed_content_node) {
+ MaybeSendBlinkFeatureUsageReport();
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ // From this point on we know this is not a main frame navigation and that
+ // there is mixed-content. Now let's decide if it's OK to proceed with it.
+
+ const WebPreferences& prefs = mixed_content_node->current_frame_host()
+ ->render_view_host()
+ ->GetWebkitPreferences();
+
+ ReportBasicMixedContentFeatures(handle_impl->request_context_type(),
+ handle_impl->mixed_content_context_type(),
+ prefs);
+
+ // If we're in strict mode, we'll automagically fail everything, and
+ // intentionally skip the client/embedder checks in order to prevent degrading
+ // the site's security UI.
+ bool block_all_mixed_content = !!(
+ mixed_content_node->current_replication_state().insecure_request_policy &
+ blink::kBlockAllMixedContent);
+ bool strictMode =
+ prefs.strict_mixed_content_checking || block_all_mixed_content;
+
+ blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType mixed_context_type =
+ handle_impl->mixed_content_context_type();
+
+ if (!ShouldTreatURLSchemeAsCORSEnabled(handle_impl->GetURL())) {
+ mixed_context_type =
+ blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType::OptionallyBlockable;
+ }
+
+ bool allowed = false;
+ ContentBrowserClient* browser_client = GetContentClient()->browser();
+ RenderFrameHostDelegate* frame_host_delegate =
+ node->current_frame_host()->delegate();
+ switch (mixed_context_type) {
+ case blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType::OptionallyBlockable:
+ allowed = !strictMode;
+ if (allowed) {
+ browser_client->PassiveInsecureContentFound(handle_impl->GetURL());
+ frame_host_delegate->DidDisplayInsecureContent();
+ }
+ break;
+
+ case blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType::Blockable: {
+ // Note: from the renderer side implementation it doesn't seem like we
+ // need to care about the UseCounter reporting of
+ // BlockableMixedContentInSubframeBlocked because it is only triggered for
+ // sub-resources which are not handled in the browser.
+ bool shouldAskEmbedder =
+ !strictMode && (!prefs.strictly_block_blockable_mixed_content ||
+ prefs.allow_running_insecure_content);
+ allowed = shouldAskEmbedder &&
+ browser_client->ShouldAllowRunningInsecureContent(
+ prefs.allow_running_insecure_content,
+ mixed_content_node->current_origin(), handle_impl->GetURL(),
+ handle_impl->GetWebContents());
+ if (allowed) {
+ const GURL& origin_url = mixed_content_node->current_url().GetOrigin();
+ frame_host_delegate->DidRunInsecureContent(origin_url,
+ handle_impl->GetURL());
+ browser_client->RecordURLMetric(
+ "ContentSettings.MixedScript.RanMixedScript", origin_url);
+ mixed_content_features_.insert(MixedContentBlockableAllowed);
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
+ case blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType::ShouldBeBlockable:
+ allowed = !strictMode;
+ if (allowed)
+ frame_host_delegate->DidDisplayInsecureContent();
+ break;
+
+ case blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType::NotMixedContent:
+ NOTREACHED();
+ break;
+ };
+
+ UpdateRendererOnMixedContentFound(
+ handle_impl, mixed_content_node->current_url(), allowed, for_redirect);
+ MaybeSendBlinkFeatureUsageReport();
+
+ return !allowed;
+}
+
+FrameTreeNode* MixedContentNavigationThrottle::InWhichFrameIsContentMixed(
+ FrameTreeNode* node,
+ const GURL& url) {
+ // Main frame navigations cannot be mixed content.
+ // TODO(carlosk): except for form submissions which will be dealt with later.
+ if (node->IsMainFrame())
+ return nullptr;
+
+ // There's no mixed content if any of these are true:
+ // - The navigated URL is potentially secure.
+ // - The root nor parent frames' origins are secure.
+ FrameTreeNode* mixed_content_node = nullptr;
+ FrameTreeNode* root = node->frame_tree()->root();
+ FrameTreeNode* parent = node->parent();
+ if (!IsUrlPotentiallySecure(url)) {
+ // TODO(carlosk): don't we need to check more than just the immediate parent
+ // and the root? Is it always the case that these two are the only sources
+ // for obtaining the "origin of the security context"?
+ // See https://crbug.com/623486.
+
+ // Checks if the root or immediate parent frame's origin are secure.
+ if (DoesOriginSchemeRestricsMixedContent(root->current_origin()))
+ mixed_content_node = root;
+ else if (DoesOriginSchemeRestricsMixedContent(parent->current_origin()))
+ mixed_content_node = parent;
+ }
+
+ // Note: This code below should behave the same way as as the two calls to
+ // measureStricterVersionOfIsMixedContent from inside
+ // MixedContentChecker::inWhichFrameIs.
+ if (mixed_content_node) {
+ // We're currently only checking for mixed content in `https://*` contexts.
+ // What about other "secure" contexts the SchemeRegistry knows about? We'll
+ // use this method to measure the occurance of non-webby mixed content to
+ // make sure we're not breaking the world without realizing it.
+ // Note: Based off of measureStricterVersionOfIsMixedContent in
+ // MixedContentChecker.cpp.
+ // TODO(carlosk): this will only ever work once we allow registration of new
+ // potentially secure schemes. crbug.com/627502
+ if (mixed_content_node->current_origin().scheme() != url::kHttpsScheme) {
+ mixed_content_features_.insert(
+ MixedContentInNonHTTPSFrameThatRestrictsMixedContent);
+ }
+ } else if (!SecurityOriginIsSecure(url) &&
+ (IsSecureScheme(root->current_origin().scheme()) ||
+ IsSecureScheme(parent->current_origin().scheme()))) {
+ mixed_content_features_.insert(
+ MixedContentInSecureFrameThatDoesNotRestrictMixedContent);
+ }
+ return mixed_content_node;
+}
+
+void MixedContentNavigationThrottle::MaybeSendBlinkFeatureUsageReport() {
+ if (!mixed_content_features_.empty()) {
+ NavigationHandleImpl* handle_impl =
+ static_cast<NavigationHandleImpl*>(navigation_handle());
+ RenderFrameHost* rfh = handle_impl->frame_tree_node()->current_frame_host();
+ rfh->Send(new FrameMsg_BlinkFeatureUsageReport(rfh->GetRoutingID(),
+ mixed_content_features_));
+ mixed_content_features_.clear();
+ }
+}
+
+// Based off of MixedContentChecker::count.
+void MixedContentNavigationThrottle::ReportBasicMixedContentFeatures(
+ RequestContextType request_context_type,
+ blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType mixed_content_context_type,
+ const WebPreferences& prefs) {
+ mixed_content_features_.insert(MixedContentPresent);
+
+ // Report any blockable content.
+ if (mixed_content_context_type ==
+ blink::WebMixedContent::ContextType::Blockable) {
+ mixed_content_features_.insert(MixedContentBlockable);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Note: as there's no mixed content checks for sub resources on the browser
+ // there should only be a subset |request_context_type| values that could ever
+ // be found here.
+ UseCounterFeature feature;
+ switch (request_context_type) {
+ case REQUEST_CONTEXT_TYPE_INTERNAL:
+ feature = MixedContentInternal;
+ break;
+ case REQUEST_CONTEXT_TYPE_PREFETCH:
+ feature = MixedContentPrefetch;
+ break;
+
+ case REQUEST_CONTEXT_TYPE_AUDIO:
+ case REQUEST_CONTEXT_TYPE_DOWNLOAD:
+ case REQUEST_CONTEXT_TYPE_FAVICON:
+ case REQUEST_CONTEXT_TYPE_IMAGE:
+ case REQUEST_CONTEXT_TYPE_PLUGIN:
+ case REQUEST_CONTEXT_TYPE_VIDEO:
+ default:
+ NOTREACHED() << "RequestContextType has value " << request_context_type
+ << " and has WebMixedContent::ContextType of "
+ << static_cast<int>(mixed_content_context_type);
+ return;
+ }
+ mixed_content_features_.insert(feature);
+}
+
+// static
+bool MixedContentNavigationThrottle::IsMixedContentForTesting(
+ const GURL& origin_url,
+ const GURL& url) {
+ const url::Origin origin(origin_url);
+ return !IsUrlPotentiallySecure(url) &&
+ DoesOriginSchemeRestricsMixedContent(origin);
+}
+
+} // namespace content

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698